The nurse teacher in clinical practice: Developing the new sub-dimension to the clinical learning environment and supervision (CLES) scale

被引:142
|
作者
Saarikoski, Mikko [1 ]
Isoaho, Hannu [2 ]
Warne, Tony [3 ]
Leino-Kilpi, Helena [2 ]
机构
[1] Turku Univ Appl Sci, Turku 20701, Finland
[2] Univ Turku, SF-20500 Turku, Finland
[3] Univ Salford, Salford M5 4WT, Lancs, England
关键词
nurse education; nurse teacher; clinical placements; instrument development;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.07.009
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Building on previous work undertaken in developing the clinical learning environment and supervision (CLES) scale this report outlines the development of a new sub-dimension to the CLES scale. Objectives: The aim was to develop an additional sub-scale to the CLES scale for measuring the quality of nurse teacher's co-operation with the crucial actors in the clinical practice of student nurses. Design, setting and methods: The original CLES scale and the subsequent CLES + T scale have been validated in two different empirical studies (N = 416 and 549). Construct validity of the instrument was assessed with explorative factor analysis (EFA) and principal components analysis (PCA). Results: The structure of the CLES+T scales factor model followed theoretical presumptions and the factors' eigenvalues and explanation percentages (64%) were sufficient. Conclusions: A validated evaluation tool-the CLES + T scale-can be used as a part of the total quality assessment of nurse education perceived by student nurses in Finland. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1233 / 1237
页数:5
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [31] The clinical learning environment, supervision and future intention to work as a nurse in nursing students: a cross-sectional and descriptive study
    Juxia Zhang
    Linda Shields
    Bin Ma
    Yuhuan Yin
    Jiancheng Wang
    Rong Zhang
    Xueke Hui
    [J]. BMC Medical Education, 22
  • [32] The clinical learning environment, supervision and future intention to work as a nurse in nursing students: a cross-sectional and descriptive study
    Zhang, Juxia
    Shields, Linda
    Ma, Bin
    Yin, Yuhuan
    Wang, Jiancheng
    Zhang, Rong
    Hui, Xueke
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [33] Student Nurse Experiences of Learning from Clinical Practice and Simulations in New Zealand: A Descriptive Qualitative Study
    Lesa, Raewyn Phyllis
    Daniel, Ben Kei
    Harland, Tony
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING, 2022, 41 : 58 - 64
  • [34] First and second cycle nursing students' perceptions of the clinical learning environment in acute care settings - A comparative crossectional study using the CLES plus T scale
    Manninen, Katri
    Karlstedt, Michaela
    Sandelin, Annika
    von Vogelsang, Ann-Christin
    Pettersson, Susanne
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2022, 108
  • [35] Perceptions of nurse preceptors of students and new graduates with learning difficulties and their willingness to precept them in clinical practice (Part 2)
    L'Ecuyer, Kristine M.
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2019, 34 : 210 - 217
  • [36] Exploring the opinions of registered nurses working in a clinical transfusion environment on the contribution of e-learning to personal learning and clinical practice: Results of a small scale educational research study
    Cottrell, Susan
    Donaldson, Jayne H.
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2013, 13 (03) : 221 - 227
  • [37] Splish, Splash, Take a New Type of Bath: Clinical Nurse Specialist Team Rapidly Translates Evidence Into Practice Through Use of Simulation, Cost Containment, and Integrated Clinical Nurse Specialist Student Learning
    Quatrara, B.
    Enfield, E.
    Wilkins, K.
    Rea, K.
    [J]. CLINICAL NURSE SPECIALIST, 2014, 28 (02) : E54 - E54
  • [38] Patient reported experience measures: a new scale that records another dimension of patient care quality important in clinical practice - Letter to the Editor
    Walimbe, Vaibhavi
    Brismee, Jean-Michel
    Kulkarni, Saurabh
    Malani, Rinkle
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2024, 26 (02) : 119 - 122