Categorization of Differing Types of Total Pancreatectomy

被引:26
|
作者
Loos, Martin [1 ]
Al-Saeedi, Mohammed [1 ]
Hinz, Ulf [1 ]
Mehrabi, Arianeb [1 ]
Schneider, Martin [1 ]
Berchtold, Christoph [1 ]
Mueller-Stich, Beat P. [1 ]
Schmidt, Thomas [2 ]
Kulu, Yakup [1 ]
Hoffmann, Katrin [1 ]
Strobel, Oliver [3 ]
Hackert, Thilo [1 ]
Buechler, Markus W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Dept Gen Visceral & Transplantat Surg, Neuenheimer Feld 420, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Gen Visceral Tumor & Transplantat Surg, Cologne, Germany
[3] Vienna Univ Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Vienna, Austria
关键词
INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA; SURGERY; DEFINITION; MORTALITY; CONSENSUS; CLASSIFICATION; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1001/jamasurg.2021.5834
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE Comparability of morbidity and mortality rates after total pancreatectomy (TP) reported by different surgical centers is limited. Procedure-specific differences, such as the extent of resection, including additional vascular or multivisceral resections, are rarely acknowledged when postoperative outcomes are reported. OBJECTIVES To evaluate postoperative outcomes after TP and categorize different types of TP based on the extent, complexity, and technical aspects of each procedure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This single-center study included a retrospective cohort of 1451 patients who had undergone TP between October 1, 2001, and December 31, 2020. Each patient was assigned to 1 of the following 4 categories that reflect increasing levels of procedure-related difficulty: standard TP (type 1), TP with venous resection (type 2), TP with multivisceral resection (type 3), and TP with arterial resection (type 4). Postoperative outcomes among the groups were compared. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Categorization of different types of TP based on the procedure-related difficulty and differing postoperative outcomes. RESULTS Of the 1451 patients who had undergone TP and were included in the analysis, 840 were men (57.9%); median age was 64.9 (IQR, 56.7 71.7) years. A total of 676 patients (46.6%) were assigned to type 1, 296 patients (20.4%) to type 2, 314 patients (21.6%) to type 3, and 165 patients (11.4%) to type 4 TP. A gradual increase in surgical morbidity was noted by TP type (type 1: 255 [37.7%], type 2: 137 [46.3%], type 3: 178 [56.7%], and type 4: 98 [59.4%]; P < .001), as was noted for median length of hospital stay (type 1: 14 [IQR, 10-19] days, type 2:16 [IQR, 12-23] days, type 3:17 [IQR, 13-29] days, and type 4:18 [IQR, 13-30] days; P < .001), and 90-day mortality (type 1: 23 [3.4%], type 2: 17 [5.7%1 type 3:29 [9.2%), and type 4:20 [12.1%]; P < .001). In the multivariable analysis, type 3 (TP with multivisceral resection) and type 4 (TP with arterial resection) were independently associated with an increased 90-day mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this study suggest there are significant differences in postoperative outcomes when the extent, complexity, and technical aspects of the procedure are considered. Classifying TP into 4 different categories may allow for better postoperative risk stratification as well as more accurate comparisons in future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 128
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The differing roles of comparison and contrast in children's categorization
    Namy, Laura L.
    Clepper, Lauren E.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 107 (03) : 291 - 305
  • [42] Relating to differing types of reactions
    Gerson, W
    ARCHIV FUR PSYCHIATRIE UND NERVENKRANKHEITEN, 1925, 73 : 13 - 25
  • [43] Categorization of differing types of non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis based on the location and hemodynamic changes during liver transplantation
    Yang, Zhe
    Lerut, Jan
    Zheng, Shusen
    JHEP REPORTS, 2022, 4 (11)
  • [44] TOTAL AND SUB-TOTAL PANCREATECTOMY IN DUCKS AND TURTLES
    DASILVA, RSM
    MIGLIORINI, RH
    ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS, 1985, 57 (01): : 124 - 124
  • [45] PANCREATIC RESECTION FOR DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA - TOTAL PANCREATECTOMY VERSUS PARTIAL PANCREATECTOMY
    FARLEY, DR
    SARR, MG
    VANHEERDEN, JA
    SEMINARS IN SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 11 (02): : 124 - 131
  • [46] Robotic Total Pancreatectomy: A Narrative Review
    Takagi, Kosei
    Koerkamp, Bas Groot
    IN VIVO, 2021, 35 (04): : 1907 - 1911
  • [47] Total pancreatectomy for cancer of the pancreas: Is it appropriate?
    Ihse, I
    Anderson, H
    AndrenSandberg, A
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 20 (03) : 288 - 294
  • [48] METABOLIC OBSERVATIONS FOLLOWING TOTAL PANCREATECTOMY
    范永康
    王淑芳
    余世治
    周粹楠
    陈秀梅
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1966, (04) : 236 - 239
  • [49] Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation: an overview
    Ong, Seok L.
    Gravante, Gianpiero
    Pollard, Cristina A.
    Webb, M'Balu A.
    Illouz, Severine
    Dennison, Ashley R.
    HPB, 2009, 11 (08) : 613 - 621
  • [50] TOTAL PANCREATECTOMY FOR CHRONIC-PANCREATITIS
    LINEHAN, IP
    LAMBERT, MA
    BROWN, DC
    KURTZ, AB
    COTTON, PB
    RUSSELL, RCG
    GUT, 1988, 29 (03) : 358 - 365