Categorization of Differing Types of Total Pancreatectomy

被引:26
|
作者
Loos, Martin [1 ]
Al-Saeedi, Mohammed [1 ]
Hinz, Ulf [1 ]
Mehrabi, Arianeb [1 ]
Schneider, Martin [1 ]
Berchtold, Christoph [1 ]
Mueller-Stich, Beat P. [1 ]
Schmidt, Thomas [2 ]
Kulu, Yakup [1 ]
Hoffmann, Katrin [1 ]
Strobel, Oliver [3 ]
Hackert, Thilo [1 ]
Buechler, Markus W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Dept Gen Visceral & Transplantat Surg, Neuenheimer Feld 420, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Gen Visceral Tumor & Transplantat Surg, Cologne, Germany
[3] Vienna Univ Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Vienna, Austria
关键词
INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA; SURGERY; DEFINITION; MORTALITY; CONSENSUS; CLASSIFICATION; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1001/jamasurg.2021.5834
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE Comparability of morbidity and mortality rates after total pancreatectomy (TP) reported by different surgical centers is limited. Procedure-specific differences, such as the extent of resection, including additional vascular or multivisceral resections, are rarely acknowledged when postoperative outcomes are reported. OBJECTIVES To evaluate postoperative outcomes after TP and categorize different types of TP based on the extent, complexity, and technical aspects of each procedure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This single-center study included a retrospective cohort of 1451 patients who had undergone TP between October 1, 2001, and December 31, 2020. Each patient was assigned to 1 of the following 4 categories that reflect increasing levels of procedure-related difficulty: standard TP (type 1), TP with venous resection (type 2), TP with multivisceral resection (type 3), and TP with arterial resection (type 4). Postoperative outcomes among the groups were compared. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Categorization of different types of TP based on the procedure-related difficulty and differing postoperative outcomes. RESULTS Of the 1451 patients who had undergone TP and were included in the analysis, 840 were men (57.9%); median age was 64.9 (IQR, 56.7 71.7) years. A total of 676 patients (46.6%) were assigned to type 1, 296 patients (20.4%) to type 2, 314 patients (21.6%) to type 3, and 165 patients (11.4%) to type 4 TP. A gradual increase in surgical morbidity was noted by TP type (type 1: 255 [37.7%], type 2: 137 [46.3%], type 3: 178 [56.7%], and type 4: 98 [59.4%]; P < .001), as was noted for median length of hospital stay (type 1: 14 [IQR, 10-19] days, type 2:16 [IQR, 12-23] days, type 3:17 [IQR, 13-29] days, and type 4:18 [IQR, 13-30] days; P < .001), and 90-day mortality (type 1: 23 [3.4%], type 2: 17 [5.7%1 type 3:29 [9.2%), and type 4:20 [12.1%]; P < .001). In the multivariable analysis, type 3 (TP with multivisceral resection) and type 4 (TP with arterial resection) were independently associated with an increased 90-day mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this study suggest there are significant differences in postoperative outcomes when the extent, complexity, and technical aspects of the procedure are considered. Classifying TP into 4 different categories may allow for better postoperative risk stratification as well as more accurate comparisons in future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 128
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] TOTAL PANCREATECTOMY IN CANCER OF THE PANCREAS
    LAUNOIS, B
    FRANCI, J
    RAMEE, MP
    PAUL, JL
    MALLEDANT, Y
    CAMPION, JP
    CARDIN, JL
    MEUNIER, B
    GASTROENTEROLOGIE CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 1989, 13 (2BIS): : A154 - A154
  • [22] FURTHER EVALUATION OF TOTAL PANCREATECTOMY
    PLIAM, MB
    REMINE, WH
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1975, 110 (05) : 506 - 512
  • [23] TOTAL PANCREATECTOMY FOR DUCTAL CARCINOMA
    HICKS, RE
    BROOKS, JR
    SURGERY GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS WITH INTERNATIONAL ABSTRACTS OF SURGERY, 1971, 133 (01): : 16 - &
  • [24] Are there still indications for total pancreatectomy?
    Marco Del Chiaro
    Elena Rangelova
    Ralf Segersvärd
    Urban Arnelo
    Updates in Surgery, 2016, 68 : 257 - 263
  • [25] TOTAL PANCREATECTOMY FOR CARCINOMA OF PANCREAS
    LAWRENCE, AG
    GHOSH, BC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1977, 133 (02): : 244 - 246
  • [26] Is there still a role for total pancreatectomy?
    Mueller, Michael W.
    Friess, Helmut
    Kleeff, Joerg
    Dahmen, Rolf
    Wagner, Markus
    Hinz, Ulf
    Breisch-Girbig, Daniela
    Ceyhan, Guralp O.
    Buechler, Markus W.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 246 (06) : 966 - 975
  • [27] EFFECTS OF TOTAL PANCREATECTOMY IN THE RAT
    SCOW, RO
    FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS, 1957, 16 (01) : 116 - 116
  • [28] TECHNIQUE FOR TOTAL PANCREATECTOMY OF DOG
    ROSIN, E
    CAMPOS, R
    MOBERG, AW
    NAJARIAN, JS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 1972, 33 (06) : 1299 - +
  • [29] Are There Indications for Total Pancreatectomy in 2016?
    Andren-Sandberg, Ake
    Ansorge, Christoph
    Yadav, Thakur Deen
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 33 (04) : 329 - 334
  • [30] Total pancreatectomy: a national study
    Murphy, Melissa M.
    Knaus, William J., II
    Ng, Sing Chau
    Hill, Joshua S.
    McPhee, James T.
    Shah, Shimul A.
    Tseng, Jennifer F.
    HPB, 2009, 11 (06) : 476 - 482