Inaccuracy of Venous Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

被引:28
|
作者
Pereira, Adriano Jose [1 ,2 ]
Correa, Thiago Domingos [1 ]
de Almeida, Francisca Pereira [1 ]
Deliberato, Rodrigo Octavio [1 ]
Lobato, Michelle dos Santos [1 ]
Akamine, Nelson [1 ]
Silva, Eliezer [1 ]
Cavalcanti, Alexandre Biasi [3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Israelita Albert Einstein, Intens Care Unit, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Lavras UFLA, Sch Med, Lavras, MG, Brazil
[3] Hosp Coracao, Res Inst HCor, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 06期
关键词
BLOOD-GLUCOSE; BEDSIDE GLUCOMETRY; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; ACCURACY; METERS; CAPILLARY; ARTERIAL; RECOMMENDATIONS; HEMATOCRIT; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0129568
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction Current guidelines and consensus recommend arterial and venous samples as equally acceptable for blood glucose assessment in point-of-care devices, but there is limited evidence to support this recommendation. We evaluated the accuracy of two devices for bedside point-of-care blood glucose measurements using arterial, fingerstick and catheter venous blood samples in ICU patients, and assessed which factors could impair their accuracy. Methods 145 patients from a 41-bed adult mixed-ICU, in a tertiary care hospital were prospectively enrolled. Fingerstick, central venous (catheter) and arterial blood (indwelling catheter) samples were simultaneously collected, once per patient. Arterial measurements obtained with Precision PCx, and arterial, fingerstick and venous measurements obtained with Accu-chek Advantage II were compared to arterial central lab measurements. Agreement between point-of-care and laboratory measurements were evaluated with Bland-Altman, and multiple linear regression models were used to investigate interference of associated factors. Results Mean difference between Accu-chek arterial samples versus central lab was 10.7 mg/dL (95% LA -21.3 to 42.7 mg/dL), and between Precision PCx versus central lab was 18.6 mg/dL (95% LA -12.6 to 49.5 mg/dL). Accu-chek fingerstick versus central lab arterial samples presented a similar bias (10.0 mg/dL) but a wider 95% LA (-31.8 to 51.8 mg/dL). Agreement between venous samples with arterial central lab was the poorest (mean bias 15.1 mg/dL; 95% LA -51.7 to 81.9). Hyperglycemia, low hematocrit, and acidosis were associated with larger differences between arterial and venous blood measurements with the two glucometers and central lab. Vasopressor administration was associated with increased error for fingerstick measurements. Conclusions Sampling from central venous catheters should not be used for glycemic control in ICU patients. In addition, reliability of the two evaluated glucometers was insufficient. Error with Accu-chek Advantage II increases mostly with central venous samples. Hyperglycemia, lower hematocrit, acidosis, and vasopressor administration increase measurement error.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] POINT-OF-CARE GLUCOSE TESTING IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    Scimio, Kylie
    Carter, Chris
    El-Oshar, Seraj
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (01) : 202 - 202
  • [2] Prevention of venous thromboembolism in critically ill surgery patients: A cross-sectional study
    Cook, D
    Laporta, D
    Skrobik, Y
    Peters, S
    Sharpe, M
    Murphy, P
    Chin, D
    Crowther, M
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2001, 16 (04) : 161 - 166
  • [3] Comparison of point-of-care and laboratory glucose analysis in critically ill patients
    Lacara, Teresita
    Domagtoy, Caroline
    Lickliter, Donna
    Quattrocchi, Kathy
    Snipes, Lydia
    Kuszaj, Joanne
    Prasnikar, MaryClare
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2007, 16 (04) : 336 - 346
  • [4] Clinical Reliability of Point-of-Care Glucose Testing in Critically Ill Patients
    Pilackas, Kylie
    El-Oshar, Seraj
    Carter, Chris
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 14 (01): : 65 - 69
  • [5] Point-of-Care Testing in Critically Ill Patients
    Fries, Dietmar
    Streif, Werner
    SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 2015, 41 (01): : 75 - 83
  • [6] COMPARISON OF GLUCOSE POINT-OF-CARE VALUES WITH LABORATORY VALUES IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    Shearer, Anna
    Boehmer, Marilyn
    Closs, Melanie
    Dela Rosa, Rosalina
    Hamilton, Jean
    Horton, Karen
    McGrath, Rose
    Schulman, Christine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 18 (03) : 224 - 230
  • [7] Point-of-Care Ultrasound Measurements to Predict Intradialytic Hypotension: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study
    Pawly, Chrystel
    Azzam, Wael
    Costanian, Christy
    Umemoto, Gonzalo Matzumura
    Ablordeppey, Enyo
    Tohme, Fadi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 32 (10): : 295 - 295
  • [8] Hypomagnesaemia in critically ill patients- A cross-sectional study
    Ahmad, Aswan
    Qaiser, Abdul Matin
    Khalid, Hanzla
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2018, 12 (02): : 970 - 972
  • [9] Adverse events in critically ill patients: a cross-sectional study
    de Assis, Stefanny Furtado
    Villas Boas Vieira, Debora Feijo
    Escobar Gimenes de Sousa, Fernanda Raphael
    de Oliveira Pinheiro, Carlos Eduardo
    do Prado, Patricia Rezende
    REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2022, 56 : e20210481
  • [10] Are point-of-care measurements of glycated haemoglobin accurate in the critically ill?
    Weinel, Luke M.
    Summers, Matthew J.
    Finnis, Mark E.
    Poole, Alexis
    Kar, Palash
    Chapman, Marianne J.
    Deane, Adam M.
    Abdelhamid, Yasmine Ali
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 32 (06) : 465 - 470