Readability of Patient Education Materials From the Web Sites of Orthopedic Implant Manufacturers

被引:13
|
作者
Yi, Meghan M. [1 ]
Yi, Paul H. [2 ]
Hussein, Khalil I. [3 ]
Cross, Michael B. [4 ]
Della Valle, Craig J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Albany Med Coll, Albany, NY 12208 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[3] Greenwich Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Greenwich, CT USA
[4] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthoped Surg, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[5] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, 1611 West Harrison St,Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2017年 / 32卷 / 12期
关键词
patient education; readability; internet; arthroplasty; orthopedic; patients; ONLINE INFORMATION; AMERICAN ACADEMY; HEALTH OUTCOMES; QUALITY; LITERACY; INTERNET; SURGEONS; BACK;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Prior studies indicate that orthopedic patient education materials are written at a level that is too high for the average patient. The purpose of this study was to assess the readability of online patient education materials provided by orthopedic implant manufacturers. Methods: All patient education articles available in 2013 from the web sites of the 5 largest orthopedic implant manufacturers were identified. Each article was evaluated with the Flesch-Kincaid (FK) readability test. The number of articles with readability <= the eighth-grade level (average reading ability of US adults) and the sixth-grade level (recommended level for patient education materials) was determined. Mean readability levels of each company's articles were compared using analysis of variance (significance set at P < .05). Results: A total of 581 articles were reviewed from the 5 largest implant manufacturers. The mean overall FK grade level was 10.9 (range, 3.8-16.1). Only 58 articles (10%) were written <= the eighth-grade level, and only 13 (2.2%) were <= the sixth-grade level. The mean FK grade level was significantly different among groups (Smith & Nephew = 12.0, Stryker = 11.6, Biomet = 11.3, DePuy = 10.6, Zimmer = 10.1; P < .0001). Conclusion: The majority of patient education materials from implant manufacturers are written at a level too high to be comprehended by the average patient. Future efforts should be made to improve the readability of orthopedic patient education materials. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3568 / 3572
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Readability of Patient Education Materials Pertaining to Gastrointestinal Procedures
    Nawaz, Mohammad S.
    McDermott, Laura E.
    Thor, Savanna
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 2021
  • [32] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to IR
    McEnteggart, Gregory E.
    Naeem, Muhammad
    Skierkowski, Dorothy
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Ahn, Sun H.
    Soares, Gregory
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 26 (08) : 1164 - 1168
  • [33] Improving the Readability of Patient Education Materials in Physical Therapy
    Stiller, Christine
    Brandt, Lindsay
    Adams, Megan
    Gura, Nathan
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [34] Readability of online Spanish patient education materials in dermatology
    Rishabh S. Mazmudar
    Anjani Sheth
    Raghav Tripathi
    Jeffrey F. Scott
    Archives of Dermatological Research, 2021, 313 : 201 - 204
  • [35] Readability assessment of patient education materials on autonomic dysreflexia
    Bataller, Will P.
    Powell, Lauren E.
    Gerdes, Austin
    Miskella, John
    White, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2025,
  • [36] Readability of online Spanish patient education materials in dermatology
    Mazmudar, Rishabh S.
    Sheth, Anjani
    Tripathi, Raghav
    Scott, Jeffrey F.
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 313 (03) : 201 - 204
  • [37] Readability of online patient education materials for juvenile dermatomyositis
    Nickles, Melissa A.
    Ramani, Santhoshini L.
    Tegtmeyer, Kyle
    Zhao, Jeffrey
    Lio, Peter A.
    PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 38 (02) : 544 - 546
  • [38] Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma
    Martin, Cole A.
    Khan, Saima
    Lee, Rachel
    Do, Anna T.
    Sridhar, Jayanth
    Crowell, Eric L.
    Bowden, Eileen C.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA, 2022, 5 (05): : 525 - 530
  • [39] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Peripheral Neuropathy
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Hansberry, David
    NEUROLOGY, 2012, 78
  • [40] Readability Assessment of Online Urology Patient Education Materials
    Colaco, Marc
    Svider, Peter F.
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Eloy, Jean Anderson
    Jackson, Imani M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (03): : 1048 - 1052