Readability of Patient Education Materials From the Web Sites of Orthopedic Implant Manufacturers

被引:13
|
作者
Yi, Meghan M. [1 ]
Yi, Paul H. [2 ]
Hussein, Khalil I. [3 ]
Cross, Michael B. [4 ]
Della Valle, Craig J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Albany Med Coll, Albany, NY 12208 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[3] Greenwich Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Greenwich, CT USA
[4] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthoped Surg, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[5] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, 1611 West Harrison St,Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2017年 / 32卷 / 12期
关键词
patient education; readability; internet; arthroplasty; orthopedic; patients; ONLINE INFORMATION; AMERICAN ACADEMY; HEALTH OUTCOMES; QUALITY; LITERACY; INTERNET; SURGEONS; BACK;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Prior studies indicate that orthopedic patient education materials are written at a level that is too high for the average patient. The purpose of this study was to assess the readability of online patient education materials provided by orthopedic implant manufacturers. Methods: All patient education articles available in 2013 from the web sites of the 5 largest orthopedic implant manufacturers were identified. Each article was evaluated with the Flesch-Kincaid (FK) readability test. The number of articles with readability <= the eighth-grade level (average reading ability of US adults) and the sixth-grade level (recommended level for patient education materials) was determined. Mean readability levels of each company's articles were compared using analysis of variance (significance set at P < .05). Results: A total of 581 articles were reviewed from the 5 largest implant manufacturers. The mean overall FK grade level was 10.9 (range, 3.8-16.1). Only 58 articles (10%) were written <= the eighth-grade level, and only 13 (2.2%) were <= the sixth-grade level. The mean FK grade level was significantly different among groups (Smith & Nephew = 12.0, Stryker = 11.6, Biomet = 11.3, DePuy = 10.6, Zimmer = 10.1; P < .0001). Conclusion: The majority of patient education materials from implant manufacturers are written at a level too high to be comprehended by the average patient. Future efforts should be made to improve the readability of orthopedic patient education materials. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3568 / 3572
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Readability of patient education materials for bariatric surgery
    Lucy, Adam Timothy
    Rakestraw, Stephanie L. L.
    Stringer, Courtney
    Chu, Daniel
    Grams, Jayleen
    Stahl, Richard
    Mustian, Margaux N. N.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (08): : 6519 - 6525
  • [22] Patient Education Materials From the Layperson's Perspective The Importance of Readability
    Blanck, Alyson W.
    Marshall, Caroline
    JOURNAL FOR NURSES IN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 27 (02) : E8 - E10
  • [23] Written orthopedic patient education materials from the point of view of empowerment by education
    Johansson, K
    Salanterä, S
    Katajisto, J
    Leino-Kilpi, H
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2004, 52 (02) : 175 - 181
  • [24] THE READABILITY OF PATIENT EDUCATION MATERIALS DESIGNED FOR PATIENTS WITH PSORIASIS
    FELDMAN, SR
    VANARTHOS, J
    FLEISCHER, AB
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1994, 30 (02) : 284 - 286
  • [25] The impact of medical terminology on readability of patient education materials
    Sand-Jecklin, Kari
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING, 2007, 24 (02) : 119 - 129
  • [26] Readability of Patient Education Materials Available at the Point of Care
    Stossel, Lauren M.
    Segar, Nora
    Gliatto, Peter
    Fallar, Robert
    Karani, Reena
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (09) : 1165 - 1170
  • [27] Readability of patient education materials: Implications for clinical practice
    Albright, J
    deGuzman, C
    Acebo, P
    Paiva, D
    Faulkner, M
    Swanson, J
    APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 1996, 9 (03) : 139 - 143
  • [28] Readability of online patient education materials for velopharyngeal insufficiency
    Xie, Deborah X.
    Wang, Ray Y.
    Chinnadurai, Sivakumar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 104 : 113 - 119
  • [29] Readability and Suitability of Online Uveitis Patient Education Materials
    Khan, Saima
    Moon, Jared
    Martin, Cole
    Bowden, Eileen
    Chen, Judy Lynn
    Tsui, Edmund
    Crowell, Eric
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)
  • [30] Readability Assessment of Online Uveitis Patient Education Materials
    Ayoub, Samantha
    Tsui, Edmund
    Mohammed, Taariq
    Tseng, Joseph
    OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION, 2019, 27 (03) : 399 - 403