Amnesia after Midazolam and Ketamine Sedation in Children: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:1
|
作者
Viana, Karolline A. [1 ]
Moterane, Monica M. [1 ]
Green, Steven M. [2 ]
Mason, Keira P. [3 ]
Costa, Luciane R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Goias, Fac Odontol, Dent Grad Program, BR-74000000 Goiania, Go, Brazil
[2] Loma Linda Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Loma Linda, CA 92354 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol Crit Care & Pain Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Fed Goias, Fac Odontol, Dept Oral Hlth, BR-74000000 Goiania, Go, Brazil
关键词
amnesia; memory; dental care; conscious sedation; child; preschool; PEDIATRIC DENTAL PATIENTS; PROCEDURAL-SEDATION; INTRANASAL MIDAZOLAM; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TRIPLE-BLIND; PART; MEMORY; KETAMINE/MIDAZOLAM; PHARMACOKINETICS; DEXMEDETOMIDINE;
D O I
10.3390/jcm10225430
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The incidence of peri-procedural amnesia following procedural sedation in children is unclear and difficult to determine. This study aimed to apply quantitative and qualitative approaches to better understand amnesia following dental sedation of children. After Institutional Review Board Approval, children scheduled for sedation for dental procedures with oral midazolam (OM), oral midazolam and ketamine (OMK), or intranasal midazolam and ketamine (IMK) were recruited for examination of peri-procedural amnesia. Amnesia during the dental session was assessed using a three-stage method, using identification of pictures and an animal toy. On the day following the sedation, primary caregivers answered two questions about their children's memory. One week later, the children received a semi-structured interview. Behavior and level of sedation during the dental session were recorded. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and comparison tests. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. Triangulation was used. Thirty-five children (age: 36 to 76 months) participated in the quantitative analysis. Most children showed amnesia for the dental procedure (82.9%, n = 29/35) and remembered receiving the sedation (82.1%, n = 23/28 for oral administration; 59.3%, n = 16/27 for intranasal administration). The occurrence of amnesia for the dental procedure was slightly higher in the oral midazolam group compared with the other groups (44.8%, n = 13/29 for OM, 13.8%, n = 4/29 for OMK, and 41.4%, n = 12/29 for IMK). Twenty-eight children participated in the qualitative approach. The major theme identified was that some children could remember their procedures in detail. We conclude that peri-procedural amnesia of the dental procedure was common following sedation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of intranasal or oral ketamine-midazolam combinations compared to oral midazolam for outpatient pediatric sedation
    Sado-Filho, Joji
    Viana, Karolline Alves
    Correa-Faria, Patricia
    Costa, Luciane Rezende
    Costa, Paulo Sucasas
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):
  • [32] Chloral hydrate versus midazolam for sedation of children for neuroimaging: A randomized clinical trial
    D'Agostino, J
    Terndrup, TE
    [J]. PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2000, 16 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [33] Is ketamine the sedative of choice for closed fracture reduction in children?: A randomized trial of ketamine versus fentanyl/midazolam
    Kharasch, SJ
    Chand, R
    Kastner, B
    Bauchner, H
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2000, 47 (04) : 111A - 111A
  • [34] Ketamine versus midazolam in bipolar depression with suicidal thoughts: A pilot midazolam-controlled randomized clinical trial
    Grunebaum, Michael F.
    Ellis, Steven P.
    Keilp, John G.
    Moitra, Vivek K.
    Cooper, Thomas B.
    Marver, Julia E.
    Burke, Ainsley K.
    Milak, Matthew S.
    Sublette, M. Elizabeth
    Oquendo, Maria A.
    Mann, J. John
    [J]. BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2017, 19 (03) : 176 - 183
  • [35] Comparative evaluation of intranasal midazolam-ketamine, dexmedetomidine-ketamine, midazolam-fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine-fentanyl combinations for procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric dental patients: a randomized controlled trial
    Agarwal, Abhilasha
    Ansari, Afroz Alam
    Nath, Rajendra
    Chak, Rakesh Kumar
    Singh, Rajeev Kumar
    Khanna, Richa
    Singh, Prem Raj
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (02) : 69 - 81
  • [36] Preemptive nebulized ketamine for pain control after tonsillectomy in children: randomized controlled trial
    Abdel-Ghaffar, Hala S.
    Abdel-Wahab, Amani H.
    Roushdy, Mohammed M.
    Osman, Amira M. M.
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2019, 69 (04): : 350 - 357
  • [37] Comparison of ketamine/propofol versus ketamine/midazolam as sedation for therapeutic and diagnostic procedures in children
    Akin, A.
    Ugur, F.
    Esmaoglu, A.
    Gulcu, N.
    Boyaci, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 21 : 149 - 150
  • [38] Effects of ketamine and midazolam on emergence agitation after sevoflurane anaesthesia in children receiving caudal block: a randomized trial
    Ozcan, Ayse
    Kaya, Ayse Gunay
    Ozcan, Namik
    Karaaslan, Gul Meltem
    Er, Esen
    Baltaci, Bulent
    Basar, Hulya
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2014, 64 (06): : 377 - 381
  • [39] Comparison of Ketamine Plus Midazolam Versus Ketamine for Sedation in Children During Lumbar Puncture
    Dilli, Dilek
    Dallar, Yildiz
    Sorguc, Nihan H.
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2009, 25 (04): : 349 - 350
  • [40] A comparative evaluation of dexmedetomidine and midazolam in pediatric sedation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis
    Lang, Bingchen
    Zhang, Lingli
    Zhang, Wensheng
    Lin, Yunzhu
    Fu, Yuzhi
    Chen, Shouming
    [J]. CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 26 (08) : 862 - 875