Amnesia after Midazolam and Ketamine Sedation in Children: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:1
|
作者
Viana, Karolline A. [1 ]
Moterane, Monica M. [1 ]
Green, Steven M. [2 ]
Mason, Keira P. [3 ]
Costa, Luciane R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Goias, Fac Odontol, Dent Grad Program, BR-74000000 Goiania, Go, Brazil
[2] Loma Linda Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Loma Linda, CA 92354 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol Crit Care & Pain Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Fed Goias, Fac Odontol, Dept Oral Hlth, BR-74000000 Goiania, Go, Brazil
关键词
amnesia; memory; dental care; conscious sedation; child; preschool; PEDIATRIC DENTAL PATIENTS; PROCEDURAL-SEDATION; INTRANASAL MIDAZOLAM; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TRIPLE-BLIND; PART; MEMORY; KETAMINE/MIDAZOLAM; PHARMACOKINETICS; DEXMEDETOMIDINE;
D O I
10.3390/jcm10225430
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The incidence of peri-procedural amnesia following procedural sedation in children is unclear and difficult to determine. This study aimed to apply quantitative and qualitative approaches to better understand amnesia following dental sedation of children. After Institutional Review Board Approval, children scheduled for sedation for dental procedures with oral midazolam (OM), oral midazolam and ketamine (OMK), or intranasal midazolam and ketamine (IMK) were recruited for examination of peri-procedural amnesia. Amnesia during the dental session was assessed using a three-stage method, using identification of pictures and an animal toy. On the day following the sedation, primary caregivers answered two questions about their children's memory. One week later, the children received a semi-structured interview. Behavior and level of sedation during the dental session were recorded. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and comparison tests. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. Triangulation was used. Thirty-five children (age: 36 to 76 months) participated in the quantitative analysis. Most children showed amnesia for the dental procedure (82.9%, n = 29/35) and remembered receiving the sedation (82.1%, n = 23/28 for oral administration; 59.3%, n = 16/27 for intranasal administration). The occurrence of amnesia for the dental procedure was slightly higher in the oral midazolam group compared with the other groups (44.8%, n = 13/29 for OM, 13.8%, n = 4/29 for OMK, and 41.4%, n = 12/29 for IMK). Twenty-eight children participated in the qualitative approach. The major theme identified was that some children could remember their procedures in detail. We conclude that peri-procedural amnesia of the dental procedure was common following sedation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sedation with intravenous ketamine and midazolam for painful procedures in children
    Karapinar, B
    Yilmaz, D
    Demirag, K
    Kantar, M
    [J]. PEDIATRICS INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 48 (02) : 146 - 151
  • [22] Midazolam and emergence phenomena in children undergoing ketamine sedation
    Carley, S
    Martin, B
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2001, 18 (04) : 273 - 274
  • [23] Midazolam or ketamine for procedural sedation of children in the emergency department
    Munro, Andrew
    Machonochie, Ian
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2007, 24 (08) : 579 - 580
  • [24] Combined oral midazolamketamine better than midazolam alone for sedation of young children: a randomized controlled trial
    Moreira, Thiago Anderson
    Costa, Paulo Sucasas
    Costa, Luciane Rezende
    Jesus-Franca, Cristiana Marinho
    Antunes, Denise Espindola
    Oliveira Gomes, Hugo Sergio
    Neto, Onofre Alves
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2013, 23 (03) : 207 - 215
  • [25] Does adjunctive midazolam reduce recovery agitation after ketamine sedation for pediatric procedures? A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Sherwin, TS
    Green, SM
    Khan, A
    Chapman, DS
    Dannenberg, B
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2000, 35 (03) : 229 - 238
  • [26] Randomized Controlled Trial of Ketamine and Moderate Sedation for Outpatient Endoscopy in Adults
    Edelson, Jerome C.
    Edelson, Cyrus, V
    Rockey, Don C.
    Morales, Amilcar L.
    Chung, Kevin K.
    Robles, Matthew J.
    Marowske, Johanna H.
    Patel, Anish A.
    Edelson, Scott F. D.
    Subramanian, Stalin R.
    Gancayco, John G.
    [J]. MILITARY MEDICINE, 2024, 189 (1-2) : 313 - 320
  • [27] Efficacy of intranasal ketamine and midazolam for pediatric sedation: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial
    Khoshrang, Hossein
    Alavi, Cyrus Emir
    Rimaz, Siamak
    Mirmansouri, Ali
    Farzi, Farnoush
    Biazar, Gelareh
    Atrkarroushan, Zahra
    Khadem, Nazanin Sabet
    [J]. CASPIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 12 (04) : 539 - 543
  • [28] Etomidate versus midazolam for procedural sedation in pediatric outpatients: A randomized controlled trial
    Di Liddo, Lydia
    D'Angelo, Antonio
    Nguyen, Bao
    Bailey, Benoit
    Amre, Devendra
    Stanciu, Constantin
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 48 (04) : 433 - 440
  • [29] Intranasal Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in Children: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
    Poonai, N.
    Canton, K.
    Elsie, S.
    Joubert, G.
    Shah, A.
    Rieder, M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 70 (04) : S109 - S109
  • [30] Randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of intranasal or oral ketamine-midazolam combinations compared to oral midazolam for outpatient pediatric sedation
    Sado-Filho, Joji
    Viana, Karolline Alves
    Correa-Faria, Patricia
    Costa, Luciane Rezende
    Costa, Paulo Sucasas
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):