Amnesia after Midazolam and Ketamine Sedation in Children: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:1
|
作者
Viana, Karolline A. [1 ]
Moterane, Monica M. [1 ]
Green, Steven M. [2 ]
Mason, Keira P. [3 ]
Costa, Luciane R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Goias, Fac Odontol, Dent Grad Program, BR-74000000 Goiania, Go, Brazil
[2] Loma Linda Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Loma Linda, CA 92354 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol Crit Care & Pain Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Fed Goias, Fac Odontol, Dept Oral Hlth, BR-74000000 Goiania, Go, Brazil
关键词
amnesia; memory; dental care; conscious sedation; child; preschool; PEDIATRIC DENTAL PATIENTS; PROCEDURAL-SEDATION; INTRANASAL MIDAZOLAM; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TRIPLE-BLIND; PART; MEMORY; KETAMINE/MIDAZOLAM; PHARMACOKINETICS; DEXMEDETOMIDINE;
D O I
10.3390/jcm10225430
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The incidence of peri-procedural amnesia following procedural sedation in children is unclear and difficult to determine. This study aimed to apply quantitative and qualitative approaches to better understand amnesia following dental sedation of children. After Institutional Review Board Approval, children scheduled for sedation for dental procedures with oral midazolam (OM), oral midazolam and ketamine (OMK), or intranasal midazolam and ketamine (IMK) were recruited for examination of peri-procedural amnesia. Amnesia during the dental session was assessed using a three-stage method, using identification of pictures and an animal toy. On the day following the sedation, primary caregivers answered two questions about their children's memory. One week later, the children received a semi-structured interview. Behavior and level of sedation during the dental session were recorded. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and comparison tests. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. Triangulation was used. Thirty-five children (age: 36 to 76 months) participated in the quantitative analysis. Most children showed amnesia for the dental procedure (82.9%, n = 29/35) and remembered receiving the sedation (82.1%, n = 23/28 for oral administration; 59.3%, n = 16/27 for intranasal administration). The occurrence of amnesia for the dental procedure was slightly higher in the oral midazolam group compared with the other groups (44.8%, n = 13/29 for OM, 13.8%, n = 4/29 for OMK, and 41.4%, n = 12/29 for IMK). Twenty-eight children participated in the qualitative approach. The major theme identified was that some children could remember their procedures in detail. We conclude that peri-procedural amnesia of the dental procedure was common following sedation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ketamine With and Without Midazolam for Emergency Department Sedation in Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sener, Serkan
    Eken, Cenker
    Schultz, Carl H.
    Serinken, Mustafa
    Ozsarac, Murat
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 57 (02) : 109 - 114
  • [2] Intravenous Ketamine plus Midazolam vs. Intravenous Ketamine for Sedation in Lumbar Puncture: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Dilli, Dilek
    Dallar, Yildiz
    Sorgui, Nihan H.
    [J]. INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2008, 45 (11) : 899 - 904
  • [3] Procedural Sedation and Analgesia With Ketamine and Midazolam In Adult Emergency Department Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sener, S.
    Eken, C.
    Schultz, C. H.
    Serinken, M.
    Ozsarac, M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 56 (03) : S20 - S20
  • [4] Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Gulla, Krishna Mohan
    Sankar, Jhuma
    Jat, Kana Ram
    Kabra, Sushil Kumar
    Lodha, Rakesh
    [J]. INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2021, 58 (02) : 117 - 122
  • [5] Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Krishna Mohan Gulla
    Jhuma Sankar
    Kana Ram Jat
    Sushil Kumar Kabra
    Rakesh Lodha
    [J]. Indian Pediatrics, 2021, 58 : 117 - 122
  • [6] Efficacy of oral ketamine compared to midazolam for sedation of children undergoing laceration repair: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
    Rubinstein, Orit
    Barkan, Shiri
    Breitbart, Rachelle
    Berkovitch, Sofia
    Toledano, Michal
    Weiser, Giora
    Karadi, Natali
    Nassi, Anat
    Kozer, Eran
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (26)
  • [7] Comparison of effects of intravenous midazolam and ketamine on emergence agitation in children: Randomized controlled trial
    Kim, Kyung Mi
    Lee, Ki Hwa
    Kim, Yong Han
    Ko, Myoung Jin
    Jung, Jae-Wook
    Kang, Eunsu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 44 (02) : 258 - 266
  • [8] A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intranasal Midazolam and Chloral Hydrate for Procedural Sedation in Children
    Stephen, Marie Christy Sharafine
    Mathew, John
    Varghese, Ajoy Mathew
    Kurien, Mary
    Mathew, George Ani
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2015, 153 (06) : 1042 - 1050
  • [9] Ketamine and Midazolam for Endoscopic Sedation During ERCP: A Randomised Controlled Trial in Comparison with Conventional Sedation Using Pethidine and Midazolam
    Greer, Shaun
    Shannon, Andrew
    Narayanan, Suresh
    Connors, Elizabeth
    Nandalan, Subash
    Jaitly, Varun
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 105 : S507 - S507
  • [10] Oral Midazolam-Ketamine versus Midazolam alone for Procedural Sedation of Children Undergoing Computed Tomography; a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Majidinejad, Saeed
    Taherian, Keramat
    Esmailian, Mehrdad
    Khazaei, Mehdi
    Samaie, Vajihe
    [J]. EMERGENCY, 2015, 3 (02): : 64 - 69