Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: Influence of luting agent

被引:0
|
作者
Zuellig-Singer, R
Bryant, RW
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Dept Conservat Dent, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Westmead Hosp, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
来源
QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL | 1998年 / 29卷 / 09期
关键词
Cerec inlays; continuous margin; luting agent; marginal adaptation; wear;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: Changes in the occlusal marginal adaptation of computer-machined inlay restorations were assessed over 3 years. Method and materials: Each of 21 patients received two Cerec (Vita Mark II) two- or three-surface restorations, with margins entirely in enamel, placed using two of four luting agents: a homogeneous microfilled resin composite, a fine hybrid composite, a relatively coarse hybrid composite, and an encapsulated glass-ionomer cement. Replicas of the restorations were made at baseline 6 months or 1 year (93% of original restorations), 2 years (79%), and 3 years (83%). The percentage of continuous margin on the occlusal margin was evaluated for the enamel-luting agent and luting agent-porcelain interfaces using a scanning electron microscope. Results: Mean continuous margin values were high for all groups at the enamel-luring agent interface; there were no significant differences among the luting agents. For each luting agent, the percentage of continuous margin decreased significantly at the luting agent-porcelain interface over 3 years; differences among the luting agents at 3 years were not significant (Kruskal-Wallis test). After 3 years, the wear of the luting agents was significantly differ-ent. The least wear occurred with the microfilled resin composite; the coarse hybrid composite showed the most wear. Conclusion: The occlusal margins of Cerec inlays exhibited consistently high-quality adaptation at 3 years. The microfilled resin composite luting agent was more wear resistant than the hybrid composites and the glass-ionomer cement.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:573 / 582
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Three-Year Clinical Evaluation of a Silorane Composite Resin
    Walter, Ricardo
    Boushell, Lee W.
    Heymann, Harald O.
    Ritter, Andre V.
    Sturdevant, John R.
    Wilder, Aldridge D., Jr.
    Chung, Yunro
    Swift, Edward J., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2014, 26 (03) : 179 - 190
  • [32] THREE-YEAR PRACTICE AND EVALUATION OF INTRODUCTORY PROGRAMMING EDUCATION
    Shinkai, J.
    Hayase, Y.
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI 2019), 2019, : 3517 - 3522
  • [33] A three-year Performance Evaluation of the NHS Hospitals in Greece
    Polyzos, N.
    HIPPOKRATIA, 2012, 16 (04) : 350 - 355
  • [34] Three-Year Evaluation of Nosocomial Infection Rates of the ICU
    Dereli, Necla
    Ozayar, Esra
    Degerli, Semih
    Sahin, Saziye
    Koc, Filiz
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2013, 63 (01): : 73 - 84
  • [35] Three-year clinical evaluation of two flowable composites
    Gallo, John R.
    Burgess, John O.
    Ripps, Alan H.
    Walker, Richard S.
    Maltezos, Mary B.
    Mercante, Donald E.
    Davidson, Jessica M.
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 41 (06): : 497 - 503
  • [36] Three-year clinical evaluation of a condensable composite.
    Sarrett, D. C.
    Brooks, C. N.
    Rose, J.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : B307 - B307
  • [37] Bond strength of three luting agents to zirconia ceramic - influence of surface treatment and thermocycling
    Attia, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2011, 19 (04) : 388 - 395
  • [38] One year clinical evaluation of composite- and ceramic-inlays in posterior teeth.
    Scheibenbogen, A
    Manhart, J
    Kunzelmann, KH
    Kremers, L
    Benz, C
    Hickel, R
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 76 : 1198 - 1198
  • [39] Three-year clinical performance of cast gold vs ceramic partial crowns
    Federlin, M.
    Wagner, J.
    Maenner, T.
    Hiller, K. -A.
    Schmalz, G.
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2007, 11 (04) : 345 - 352
  • [40] Two year clinical evaluation of composite- and ceramic-inlays in posterior teeth.
    Scheibenbogen, A
    Manhart, J
    Hickel, R
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 913 - 913