Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: Influence of luting agent

被引:0
|
作者
Zuellig-Singer, R
Bryant, RW
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Dept Conservat Dent, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Westmead Hosp, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
来源
QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL | 1998年 / 29卷 / 09期
关键词
Cerec inlays; continuous margin; luting agent; marginal adaptation; wear;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: Changes in the occlusal marginal adaptation of computer-machined inlay restorations were assessed over 3 years. Method and materials: Each of 21 patients received two Cerec (Vita Mark II) two- or three-surface restorations, with margins entirely in enamel, placed using two of four luting agents: a homogeneous microfilled resin composite, a fine hybrid composite, a relatively coarse hybrid composite, and an encapsulated glass-ionomer cement. Replicas of the restorations were made at baseline 6 months or 1 year (93% of original restorations), 2 years (79%), and 3 years (83%). The percentage of continuous margin on the occlusal margin was evaluated for the enamel-luting agent and luting agent-porcelain interfaces using a scanning electron microscope. Results: Mean continuous margin values were high for all groups at the enamel-luring agent interface; there were no significant differences among the luting agents. For each luting agent, the percentage of continuous margin decreased significantly at the luting agent-porcelain interface over 3 years; differences among the luting agents at 3 years were not significant (Kruskal-Wallis test). After 3 years, the wear of the luting agents was significantly differ-ent. The least wear occurred with the microfilled resin composite; the coarse hybrid composite showed the most wear. Conclusion: The occlusal margins of Cerec inlays exhibited consistently high-quality adaptation at 3 years. The microfilled resin composite luting agent was more wear resistant than the hybrid composites and the glass-ionomer cement.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:573 / 582
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays after one year.
    Santos, MJC
    Navarro, MFL
    Francischone, CE
    Lopes, LG
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : 130 - 130
  • [22] Four-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays.
    Manhart, J
    Chen, HY
    Albrecht, A
    Neuerer, P
    Hickel, R
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A332 - A332
  • [23] CERAMIC INLAYS (CEREC) CEMENTED WITH EITHER A DUAL-CURED OR A CHEMICALLY CURED COMPOSITE RESIN LUTING AGENT - A 2-YEAR CLINICAL-STUDY
    SJOGREN, G
    MOLIN, M
    VANDIJKEN, J
    BERGMAN, M
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 53 (05) : 325 - 330
  • [24] A one-year clinical evaluation of milled ceramic inlays.
    Neo, J
    Yap, A
    Chew, CL
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 913 - 913
  • [25] Three-year clinical performance of two indirect composite inlays compared to direct composite restorations
    Ozakar-Ilday, Nurcan
    Zorba, Yahya-Orcun
    Yildiz, Mehmet
    Erdem, Vildan
    Seven, Nilgun
    Demirbuga, Sezer
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2013, 18 (03): : E521 - E528
  • [26] One-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays in posterior teeth
    Scheibenbogen, A
    Manhart, J
    Kunzelmann, KH
    Hickel, R
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1998, 80 (04): : 410 - 416
  • [27] RESULTS OF A THREE-YEAR INTERLABORATORY TEST PROGRAM ON ADHESIVES FOR CERAMIC TILES
    Coarna, Mariana
    Guslicov, Graziela
    Vlad, Cristina
    Ionita, Cristina
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL PROFICIENCY TESTING CONFERENCE, PTCONF 2011, 2011, : 112 - 119
  • [28] In vitro evaluation of wall-to-wall adaptation of a self-adhesive resin cement used for luting gold and ceramic inlays
    Fabianelli, A
    Goracci, F
    Bertelli, E
    Monticelli, F
    Grandini, M
    Ferrari, M
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2005, 7 (01): : 33 - 40
  • [29] Two-year Clinical Evaluation of IPS Empress II Ceramic Onlays/Inlays
    Tagtekin, D. A.
    Ozyoney, G.
    Yanikoglu, F.
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2009, 34 (04) : 369 - 378
  • [30] An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system
    Pallesen, U
    van Dijken, JWV
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 2000, 108 (03) : 239 - 246