Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: Influence of luting agent

被引:0
|
作者
Zuellig-Singer, R
Bryant, RW
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Dept Conservat Dent, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Westmead Hosp, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
来源
QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL | 1998年 / 29卷 / 09期
关键词
Cerec inlays; continuous margin; luting agent; marginal adaptation; wear;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: Changes in the occlusal marginal adaptation of computer-machined inlay restorations were assessed over 3 years. Method and materials: Each of 21 patients received two Cerec (Vita Mark II) two- or three-surface restorations, with margins entirely in enamel, placed using two of four luting agents: a homogeneous microfilled resin composite, a fine hybrid composite, a relatively coarse hybrid composite, and an encapsulated glass-ionomer cement. Replicas of the restorations were made at baseline 6 months or 1 year (93% of original restorations), 2 years (79%), and 3 years (83%). The percentage of continuous margin on the occlusal margin was evaluated for the enamel-luting agent and luting agent-porcelain interfaces using a scanning electron microscope. Results: Mean continuous margin values were high for all groups at the enamel-luring agent interface; there were no significant differences among the luting agents. For each luting agent, the percentage of continuous margin decreased significantly at the luting agent-porcelain interface over 3 years; differences among the luting agents at 3 years were not significant (Kruskal-Wallis test). After 3 years, the wear of the luting agents was significantly differ-ent. The least wear occurred with the microfilled resin composite; the coarse hybrid composite showed the most wear. Conclusion: The occlusal margins of Cerec inlays exhibited consistently high-quality adaptation at 3 years. The microfilled resin composite luting agent was more wear resistant than the hybrid composites and the glass-ionomer cement.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:573 / 582
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Two-year Clinical Evaluation of a Self-adhesive Luting Agent for Ceramic Inlays
    Peumans, Marleen
    De Munck, Jan
    Van Landuyt, Kirsten
    Poitevin, Andre
    Lambrechts, Paul
    Van Meerbeek, Bart
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2010, 12 (02): : 151 - 161
  • [2] Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays
    Peumans, Marleen
    Voet, M.
    De Munck, J.
    Van Landuyt, K.
    Van Ende, A.
    Van Meerbeek, B.
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 17 (03) : 739 - 750
  • [3] Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays
    Marleen Peumans
    M. Voet
    J. De Munck
    K. Van Landuyt
    A. Van Ende
    B. Van Meerbeek
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2013, 17 : 739 - 750
  • [4] Three year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays
    Manhart, J
    Chen, HY
    Neuerer, P
    Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner, A
    Hickel, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2001, 14 (02): : 95 - 99
  • [5] Three-year clinical evaluation of Artglass- and Charisma-inlays.
    Manhart, J
    Huetzen, D
    Chen, HY
    Neuerer, P
    Hickel, R
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A333 - A333
  • [6] Three-year clinical evaluation of luting agents for Cerec restorations.
    Zuellig, R
    Bryant, RW
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 : 1042 - 1042
  • [7] A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent
    Sjogren, G
    Molin, M
    van Dijken, JWV
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 56 (05) : 263 - 267
  • [8] Five year evaluation of ceramic inlays.
    vanDijken, JWV
    Aberg, CH
    Olofsson, AL
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 (05) : 1302 - 1302
  • [9] 2-YEAR EVALUATION OF CEREC RESTORATIONS - INFLUENCE OF LUTING AGENT
    ZUELLIG, R
    BRYANT, R
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 : 405 - 405
  • [10] Clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM-generated composite inlays: Three-year report.
    Fasbinder, D. J.
    Dennison, J. B.
    Heys, D.
    Lampe, K.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : B21 - B21