Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma

被引:47
|
作者
Guenther, Lillian M. [1 ]
Rowe, R. Grant [1 ]
Acharya, Patricia T. [2 ]
Swenson, David W. [2 ]
Meyer, Stephanie C. [1 ]
Clinton, Catherine M. [1 ]
Guo, Dongjing [1 ]
Sridharan, Madhumitha [1 ]
London, Wendy B. [1 ]
Grier, Holcombe E. [1 ]
Ecklund, Kirsten [2 ]
Janeway, Katherine A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dana Farber Boston Childrens Canc & Blood Disorde, Boston, MA USA
[2] Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA USA
关键词
bone tumors; clinical trials; osteosarcoma; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; CHILDRENS ONCOLOGY GROUP; HIGH-DOSE IFOSFAMIDE; PHASE-II TRIAL; OSTEOGENIC-SARCOMA; NONMETASTATIC OSTEOSARCOMA; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; PULMONARY METASTASES; CANCER GROUP; SURVIVAL; ADOLESCENTS;
D O I
10.1002/pbc.26896
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: In osteosarcoma, patient survival has not changed in over 30 years. Multiple phase II trials have been conducted in osteosarcoma using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) as a primary endpoint; however, none of these have revealed new treatment strategies. We investigated RECIST in newly diagnosed patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy proven to be beneficial. Methods: Patients treated from 1986 to 2011 for newly diagnosed osteosarcoma with paired tumor imaging before and after adequate neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in this retrospective study. Two radiologists performed independent, blinded (to image timing) RECIST measurements of primary tumor and lung metastases at diagnosis and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Association between RECIST and histological necrosis and outcome were assessed. Results: Seventy-four patients met inclusion criteria. Five-year overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were 77 +/- 7% and 61 +/- 8%, respectively. No patients had RECIST partial or complete response in the primary tumor. Sixty-four patients (86%) had stable disease, and 10 (14%) had progressive disease (PD). PD in the primary tumor was associated with significantly worse PFS in localized disease patients (P = 0.02). There was no association between RECIST in the primary tumor and necrosis. There were an insufficient number of patients with lung nodules >= 1 cm at diagnosis to evaluate RECIST in pulmonary metastases. Conclusions: PD by RECIST predicts poor outcome in localized disease patients. In bone lesions, chemotherapy proven to improve overall survival does not result in radiographic responses as measured by RECIST. Further investigation of RECIST in pulmonary metastatic disease in osteosarcoma is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Inadequacy of the new Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: report of four cases
    Monetti, F
    Casanova, S
    Grasso, A
    Cafferata, MA
    Ardizzoni, A
    Neumaier, CE
    LUNG CANCER, 2004, 43 (01) : 71 - 74
  • [42] The Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Yield a More Accurate Prognoses Than the RECIST 1.1. in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Radioembolization
    Lee, Jae Seung
    Choi, Hong Jun
    Kim, Beom Kyung
    Park, Jun Yong
    Kim, Do Young
    Ahn, Sang Hoon
    Han, Kwang-Hyub
    Baek, Song-Ee
    Chung, Yong Eun
    Park, Mi-Suk
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    Rhee, Hyungjin
    Kim, Seung Up
    GUT AND LIVER, 2020, 14 (06) : 765 - 774
  • [43] Evaluation of response to chemotherapy in NSCLC patients: An interdisciplinary comparison using RECIST and WHO criteria
    Grossi, F
    Belvedere, O
    Bazzocchi, M
    Buffoli, A
    Ceschia, T
    Dolcet, F
    Fasola, G
    Mariuzzi, L
    Morelli, A
    Polsinelli, M
    Reccardini, F
    Sacco, C
    Sibau, A
    Talmassons, G
    Zussino, M
    Sobrero, A
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2000, 11 : 5 - 5
  • [44] Comparison of RECIST, EORTC criteria and PERCIST using MRI and PET/CT for evaluation of early response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with cervical carcinoma
    Sun, Yanqin
    Yu, Lijuan
    Nanding, Abiyasi
    Wang, Wenzhi
    Kuai, Zi-Xiang
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2017, 58
  • [45] Comparison of RECIST, EORTC criteria and PERCIST using MRI and PET/CT for evaluation of early response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with cervical carcinoma
    Sun, Yanqin
    Yu, Lijuan
    Nanding, Abiyasi
    Wang, Wenzhi
    Kuai, Zi-Xiang
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2017, 58
  • [46] Time efficiency and feasibility of Lesion Dashboard workflow for computing RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) treatment response assessment.
    Sharma, Manish
    Sevenster, Merlijn
    Cowhy, Andrea
    Obara, Piotr
    Peters, Joost F.
    Trost, William
    Wall, Lauren
    Westin, Charles W.
    Chang, Paul J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [47] Prognostic value of response assessed by RECIST and WHO criteria to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer patients
    Park, S. R.
    Lee, J. S.
    Kim, Y. W.
    Choi, I. J.
    Ryu, K. W.
    Lee, J. H.
    Lee, J. Y.
    Park, Y. L.
    Park, S. Y.
    Park, Y. I.
    Kim, N. K.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (15)
  • [48] Pearls and pitfalls of response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v1.1 non-target lesion assessment
    Morse, Brian
    Jeong, Daniel
    Ihnat, Gary
    Silva, Alvin C.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (02) : 766 - 774
  • [49] Pearls and pitfalls of response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v1.1 non-target lesion assessment
    Brian Morse
    Daniel Jeong
    Gary Ihnat
    Alvin C. Silva
    Abdominal Radiology, 2019, 44 : 766 - 774
  • [50] Response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST): problems and need for modifications in paediatric oncology?
    McHugh, K
    Kao, S
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 76 (907): : 433 - 436