Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma

被引:47
|
作者
Guenther, Lillian M. [1 ]
Rowe, R. Grant [1 ]
Acharya, Patricia T. [2 ]
Swenson, David W. [2 ]
Meyer, Stephanie C. [1 ]
Clinton, Catherine M. [1 ]
Guo, Dongjing [1 ]
Sridharan, Madhumitha [1 ]
London, Wendy B. [1 ]
Grier, Holcombe E. [1 ]
Ecklund, Kirsten [2 ]
Janeway, Katherine A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dana Farber Boston Childrens Canc & Blood Disorde, Boston, MA USA
[2] Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA USA
关键词
bone tumors; clinical trials; osteosarcoma; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; CHILDRENS ONCOLOGY GROUP; HIGH-DOSE IFOSFAMIDE; PHASE-II TRIAL; OSTEOGENIC-SARCOMA; NONMETASTATIC OSTEOSARCOMA; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; PULMONARY METASTASES; CANCER GROUP; SURVIVAL; ADOLESCENTS;
D O I
10.1002/pbc.26896
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: In osteosarcoma, patient survival has not changed in over 30 years. Multiple phase II trials have been conducted in osteosarcoma using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) as a primary endpoint; however, none of these have revealed new treatment strategies. We investigated RECIST in newly diagnosed patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy proven to be beneficial. Methods: Patients treated from 1986 to 2011 for newly diagnosed osteosarcoma with paired tumor imaging before and after adequate neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in this retrospective study. Two radiologists performed independent, blinded (to image timing) RECIST measurements of primary tumor and lung metastases at diagnosis and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Association between RECIST and histological necrosis and outcome were assessed. Results: Seventy-four patients met inclusion criteria. Five-year overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were 77 +/- 7% and 61 +/- 8%, respectively. No patients had RECIST partial or complete response in the primary tumor. Sixty-four patients (86%) had stable disease, and 10 (14%) had progressive disease (PD). PD in the primary tumor was associated with significantly worse PFS in localized disease patients (P = 0.02). There was no association between RECIST in the primary tumor and necrosis. There were an insufficient number of patients with lung nodules >= 1 cm at diagnosis to evaluate RECIST in pulmonary metastases. Conclusions: PD by RECIST predicts poor outcome in localized disease patients. In bone lesions, chemotherapy proven to improve overall survival does not result in radiographic responses as measured by RECIST. Further investigation of RECIST in pulmonary metastatic disease in osteosarcoma is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Circulating tumor DNA: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors - can we RECIST? Focus on colorectal cancer
    Spindler, Karen-Lise Garm
    Jakobsen, Anders
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 15
  • [32] Local response of esophageal carcinoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in CT examination according to WHO and RECIST criteria
    Paslawski, Marek
    Koltys, Witold
    Zlomaniec, Janusz
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 71 (03) : 7 - 10
  • [33] Evaluation of therapeutic response in morphological imaging of solid tumors (RECIST): Background, application and adaptation of criteria to novel therapies
    Kamga, J. Dzuko
    Tissot, V.
    Abgral, R.
    MEDECINE NUCLEAIRE-IMAGERIE FONCTIONNELLE ET METABOLIQUE, 2024, 48 (06): : 267 - 271
  • [34] Alternative Response Criteria (Choi, European Association for the Study of the Liver, and Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST]) Versus RECIST 1.1 in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Sorafenib
    Ronot, Maxime
    Bouattour, Mohamed
    Wassermann, Johannaw
    Bruno, Onorina
    Dreyer, Chantal
    Larroque, Beatrice
    Castera, Laurent
    Vilgrain, Valerie
    Belghiti, Jacques
    Raymond, Eric
    Faivre, Sandrine
    ONCOLOGIST, 2014, 19 (04): : 394 - 402
  • [35] Clinical evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma
    Zhu, Wengang
    Zhu, Lizhen
    Bao, Yongzheng
    Zhong, Xueren
    Chen, Yu
    Wu, Qiang
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2019, 24 (03): : 1181 - 1185
  • [36] Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor 1.0 with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor 1.1 on MRI in Advanced Breast Cancer Response Evaluation to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Jeh, Su Kyung
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Kang, Bong Joo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 14 (01) : 13 - 20
  • [37] Can paediatric radiologists resist RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours)?
    McHugh, K
    Kao, S
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2003, 33 (11) : 739 - 743
  • [38] An evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of extremities: PERCIST versus RECIST 1.1 criteria after long-term follow-up (vol 36, pg 553, 2022)
    Xu, Jie
    Li, Yuan
    Xie, Lu
    Sun, Xin
    Cai, Zhenyu
    Wang, Shidong
    Wang, Qian
    Sun, Kunkun
    Guo, Wei
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2022, 36 (08) : 785 - 785
  • [39] Tumor response evaluation criteria for HCC (hepatocellular carcinoma) treated using TACE (transcatheter arterial chemoembolization): RECIST (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) version 1.1 and mRECIST (modified RECIST): JIVROSG-0602
    Sato, Yozo
    Watanabe, Hirokazu
    Sone, Miyuki
    Onaya, Hiroaki
    Sakamoto, Noriaki
    Osuga, Keigo
    Takahashi, Masahide
    Arai, Yasuaki
    UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 118 (01) : 16 - 22
  • [40] Can paediatric radiologists resist RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours)?
    Kieran McHugh
    Simon Kao
    Pediatric Radiology, 2003, 33 : 739 - 743