A Randomized trial of incentives to improve response rates to a mailed women's health questionnaire

被引:34
|
作者
Whiteman, MK [1 ]
Langenberg, P [1 ]
Kjerulff, K [1 ]
McCarter, R [1 ]
Flaws, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/154099903322447783
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Mailed questionnaires can be a convenient method for collecting data on women's health, although poor response rates are a concern. Methods: As part of a survey of women's health conducted in Maryland in 2001, a randomized trial was performed to assess the effects of two incentives ($1.00 or a lottery ticket) as well as precontact with an introductory postcard on response rates. Questionnaires were mailed to 3000 women aged 40-60 who were randomized to one of six incentive/precontact groups: lottery/postcard, money/postcard, postcard only, lottery only, money only, or no incentive/no postcard. Results: The overall response rate was 37.6%. Each incentive/precontact group yielded a higher response rate than the no incentive/no postcard group, although only the response rates for the lottery/postcard group (41.3%) and the money only group (40.0%) were significantly higher than that of the no incentive/no postcard group (33.1%). Money was the only factor that had a significant independent effect on likelihood of response (hazards ratio [HR] compared to no incentive = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03, 1.43). Response rates were lower in minority ZIP codes, although the effects of the incentives were generally greater than in the nonminority ZIP codes. Conclusions: These results indicate that response rates to mailed women's health questionnaires may be improved with modest incentives, particularly cash incentives.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 828
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of E-Mailed Versus Mailed Invitations and Incentives on Response Rates, Data Quality, and Costs in a Web Survey of University Faculty
    Dykema, Jennifer
    Stevenson, John
    Klein, Lisa
    Kim, Yujin
    Day, Brendan
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2013, 31 (03) : 359 - 370
  • [32] A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF LOTTERY-BASED INCENTIVES TO IMPROVE WARFARIN ADHERENCE: THE WARFARIN INCENTIVES (WIN) TRIAL
    Volpp, Kevin
    Loewenstein, George
    Brensinger, Colleen
    Jaskowiak, Jane
    Doshi, Jalpa
    Laskin, Mitchell
    Kimmel, Stephen
    Troxel, Andrea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 25 : 214 - 214
  • [33] Trial questionnaire response rates - Is bigger better?
    Davidson, Tracey
    Cooper, David
    [J]. TRIALS, 2019, 20
  • [34] Effect of Financial Incentives on Patient Use of Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Mehta, Shivan J.
    Pepe, Rebecca S.
    Gabler, Nicole B.
    Kanneganti, Mounika
    Reitz, Catherine
    Saia, Chelsea
    Teel, Joseph
    Asch, David A.
    Volpp, Kevin G.
    Doubeni, Chyke A.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (03) : e191156
  • [35] A randomized trial of mailed outreach with behavioral economic interventions to improve liver cancer surveillance
    Mehta, Shivan J.
    McDonald, Caitlin
    Reitz, Catherine
    Kastuar, Shivani
    Snider, Christopher K.
    Okorie, Evelyn
    McNelis, Kiernan
    Shaikh, Hamzah
    Cook, Tessa S.
    Goldberg, David S.
    Rothstein, Kenneth
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 8 (01)
  • [36] Text message reminders to improve questionnaire response rates
    Keding, Ada
    Brabyn, Sally
    MacPherson, Hugh
    Richmond, Stewart J.
    Torgerson, David J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 79 : 90 - 95
  • [37] The effects of lottery incentive and length of questionnaire on health survey response rates: A randomized study
    Kalantar, JS
    Talley, NJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 52 (11) : 1117 - 1122
  • [38] Response rates to a mailed survey targeting childhood cancer survivors: A comparison of conditional versus unconditional incentives
    Rosoff, PM
    Werner, C
    Clipp, EC
    Guill, AB
    Bonner, M
    Dernark-Wahnefried, W
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2005, 14 (05) : 1330 - 1332
  • [39] Timing of electronic reminders did not improve trial participant questionnaire response: a randomized trial and meta-analyses
    Sarathy, Prasanna Partha
    Kottam, Lucksy
    Parker, Adwoa
    Brealey, Stephen
    Coleman, Elizabeth
    Keding, Ada
    Mitchell, Alex
    Northgraves, Matthew
    Torgerson, David
    Rangan, Amar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 122 : 70 - 77
  • [40] Selected questionnaire size and color combinations were significantly related to mailed survey response rates
    Beebe, Timothy J.
    Stoner, Sarah M.
    Anderson, Kari J.
    Williams, Arthur R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 60 (11) : 1184 - 1189