Timing of electronic reminders did not improve trial participant questionnaire response: a randomized trial and meta-analyses

被引:5
|
作者
Sarathy, Prasanna Partha [1 ]
Kottam, Lucksy [2 ]
Parker, Adwoa [1 ]
Brealey, Stephen [1 ]
Coleman, Elizabeth [1 ]
Keding, Ada [1 ]
Mitchell, Alex [1 ]
Northgraves, Matthew [1 ]
Torgerson, David [1 ]
Rangan, Amar [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York Trials Unit, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] South Tees Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, James Cook Univ Hosp, STRIVE, Marton Rd, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, Cleveland, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Randomized controlled trial; SMS; Text message; Retention; Study Within A Trial; Meta-analyses; POSTAL QUESTIONNAIRES; RATES; RETENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess whether timing of short messaging service (SMS) reminders improved postal questionnaire return rates from participants in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Study Design and Setting: A Study Within A Trial (SWAT) embedded in a multicenter RCT evaluating three treatments for the frozen shoulder. Participants who provided a mobile telephone number were randomized to either prenotification SMS on the day of the questionnaire mail-out or postnotification SMS 4 days after questionnaire mail-out for the 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who returned a valid questionnaire. A systematic review was undertaken to identify other embedded trials to perform a meta-analysis. Results: Of the 269 participants, 122/135 (90.4%) returned a valid questionnaire in the prenotification arm and 119/134 (88.8%) in the postnotification arm (difference of -1.6%; 95% CI of difference: -8.9%, 5.7%). There was no difference in time to response (HR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.34) or need for additional reminders (OR - 0.71; 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.17). Meta-analysis of two RCTs showed no difference in response rates between prenotification and postnotification reminders (OR - 0.78 95% CI: 0.42 to 1.45). Conclusion: Timing of SMS reminders did not improve response rates and time to response or affect the need for additional reminders. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 77
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Electronic reminders did not improve postal questionnaire response rates or response times: a randomized controlled trial
    Man, Mei-See
    Tilbrook, Helen E.
    Jayakody, Shalmini
    Hewitt, Catherine E.
    Cox, Helen
    Cross, Ben
    Torgerson, David J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (09) : 1001 - 1004
  • [2] Timing of text message reminders to increase trial participant response to postal questionnaires: an embedded randomized trial
    Parker, Adwoa
    Brealey, Stephen
    Keding, Ada
    Kottam, Lucksy
    Mitchell, Alex
    Northgraves, Matthew
    Sarathy, Prasanna Partha
    Welch, Charlie
    Rangan, Amar
    [J]. TRIALS, 2019, 20
  • [3] Reducing questionnaire length did not improve physician response rate: a randomized trial
    Bolt, Eva E.
    van der Heide, Agnes
    Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (04) : 477 - 481
  • [4] A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve medication laboratory monitoring
    Matheny, Michael E.
    Sequist, Thomas D.
    Seger, Andrew C.
    Fiskio, Julie M.
    Sperling, Michael
    Bugbee, Don
    Bates, David W.
    Gandhi, Tejal K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2008, 15 (04) : 424 - 429
  • [5] Optimizing Number and Timing of Appointment Reminders: A Randomized Trial
    Steiner, John F.
    Shainline, Michael R.
    Dahlgren, Jennifer Z.
    Kroll, Alan
    Xu, Stan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2018, 24 (08): : 377 - 384
  • [6] Randomized trial within a trial of yellow 'post-it notes' did not improve questionnaire response rates among participants in a trial of treatments for neck pain
    Tilbrook, Helen E.
    Becque, Taeko
    Buckley, Hannah
    MacPherson, Hugh
    Bailey, Mathew
    Torgerson, David J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2015, 21 (02) : 202 - 204
  • [7] How individual participant data meta-analyses have influenced trial design, conduct, and analysis
    Tierney, Jayne F.
    Pignon, Jean-Pierre
    Gueffyier, Francois
    Clarke, Mike
    Askie, Lisa
    Vale, Claire L.
    Burdett, Sarah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 68 (11) : 1325 - 1335
  • [8] SMS reminders did not improve PrEP adherence in a randomized controlled trial among young Kenyan women
    Haberer, J.
    Mugo, N.
    Bukusi, E.
    Pyra, M.
    Oware, K.
    Kiptinness, C.
    Thomas, K.
    Garrison, L.
    Musinguzi, N.
    Morrison, S.
    Anderson, P.
    Ngure, K.
    Baeten, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL AIDS SOCIETY, 2021, 24
  • [9] Trial sequential boundaries for cumulative meta-analyses
    Miladinovic, Branko
    Hozo, Iztok
    Djulbegovic, Benjamin
    [J]. STATA JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (01): : 77 - 91
  • [10] A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve quality of care for diabetes and coronary artery disease
    Sequist, TD
    Gandhi, TK
    Karson, AS
    Fiskio, JM
    Bugbee, D
    Sperling, M
    Cook, EF
    Orav, EJ
    Fairchild, DG
    Bates, DW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2005, 12 (04) : 431 - 437