A Randomized trial of incentives to improve response rates to a mailed women's health questionnaire

被引:34
|
作者
Whiteman, MK [1 ]
Langenberg, P [1 ]
Kjerulff, K [1 ]
McCarter, R [1 ]
Flaws, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/154099903322447783
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Mailed questionnaires can be a convenient method for collecting data on women's health, although poor response rates are a concern. Methods: As part of a survey of women's health conducted in Maryland in 2001, a randomized trial was performed to assess the effects of two incentives ($1.00 or a lottery ticket) as well as precontact with an introductory postcard on response rates. Questionnaires were mailed to 3000 women aged 40-60 who were randomized to one of six incentive/precontact groups: lottery/postcard, money/postcard, postcard only, lottery only, money only, or no incentive/no postcard. Results: The overall response rate was 37.6%. Each incentive/precontact group yielded a higher response rate than the no incentive/no postcard group, although only the response rates for the lottery/postcard group (41.3%) and the money only group (40.0%) were significantly higher than that of the no incentive/no postcard group (33.1%). Money was the only factor that had a significant independent effect on likelihood of response (hazards ratio [HR] compared to no incentive = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03, 1.43). Response rates were lower in minority ZIP codes, although the effects of the incentives were generally greater than in the nonminority ZIP codes. Conclusions: These results indicate that response rates to mailed women's health questionnaires may be improved with modest incentives, particularly cash incentives.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 828
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dermatologist response rates to a mailed questionnaire: A randomized trial of monetary incentives
    Wan, Joy
    Abuabara, Katrina
    Shin, Daniel B.
    Troxel, Andrea B.
    Bebo, Bruce F., Jr.
    Gelfand, Joel M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 66 (01) : E18 - E20
  • [2] Randomized trial of financial incentives for improving response to a mailed questionnaire.
    Doody, MM
    Kampa, D
    Chimes, K
    Tarone, RE
    Sigurdson, AJ
    Linet, MS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 153 (11) : S82 - S82
  • [3] Randomized trial of financial incentives and delivery methods for improving response to a mailed questionnaire
    Doody, MM
    Sigurdson, AS
    Kampa, D
    Chimes, K
    Alexander, BH
    Ron, E
    Tarone, RE
    Linet, MS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 157 (07) : 643 - 651
  • [4] Lottery incentives did not improve response rate to a mailed survey: a randomized controlled trial
    Harris, Ian A.
    Khoo, Oliver K.
    Young, Jane M.
    Solomon, Michael J.
    Rae, Hamish
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (06) : 609 - 610
  • [5] Questionnaire color and response rates to mailed surveys - A randomized trial and a meta-analysis
    Etter, JF
    Cucherat, M
    Perneger, TV
    [J]. EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2002, 25 (02) : 185 - 199
  • [6] RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF 2 INCENTIVES TO INCREASE RESPONSE RATE TO A MAILED SURVEY
    PERNEGER, TV
    ETTER, JF
    ROUGEMONT, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 138 (08) : 619 - 619
  • [7] The effect of personalisation on mailed questionnaire response rates
    Byrom, J
    Bennison, D
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2000, 42 (03): : 357 - 358
  • [8] EFFECT OF INCENTIVES AND PERSONAL CONTACT ON RESPONSE RATE TO A MAILED QUESTIONNAIRE
    SHACKLETON, VJ
    WILD, JM
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1982, 50 (02) : 365 - 366
  • [9] Controlled trial of the effect of length, incentives, and follow-up techniques on response to a mailed questionnaire
    Hoffman, SC
    Burke, AE
    Helzlsouer, KJ
    Comstock, GW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 148 (10) : 1007 - 1011
  • [10] Randomized trial of $5 versus $10 monetary incentives, envelope size, and candy to increase physician response rates to mailed questionnaires
    Halpern, SD
    Ubel, PA
    Berlin, JA
    Asch, DA
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (09) : 834 - 839