Randomized trial of financial incentives and delivery methods for improving response to a mailed questionnaire

被引:43
|
作者
Doody, MM
Sigurdson, AS
Kampa, D
Chimes, K
Alexander, BH
Ron, E
Tarone, RE
Linet, MS
机构
[1] NCI, Radiat Epidemiol Branch, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, NIH,Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Div Environm & Occupat Hlth, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Westat Corp, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
cohort studies; data collection; epidemiologic methods; motivation; nonresponse; postal service; questionnaires; randomized controlled trials;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwg033
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In a follow-up study, only 64% of 126,628 US radiologic technologists completed a questionnaire during 19941997 after two mailings. The authors conducted a randomized trial of financial incentives and delivery methods to identify the least costly approach for increasing overall participation. They randomly selected nine samples of 300 nonresponders each to receive combinations of no, $1.00, $2.00, and $5.00 cash or check incentives delivered by first-class mail or Federal Express. Federal Express delivery did not achieve greater participation than first-class mail (23.2% vs. 23.7%). In analyses pooled across delivery methods, the response was significantly greater for the $2.00 bill (28.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 25.2, 32.7; p<0.0001), $5.00 check (27.5%, 95% CI: 22.5, 33.0; p=0.0001), $1.00 bill (24.6%, 95% CI: 21.2, 28.3; p=0.0007), and $2.00 check (21.8%, 95% CI: 18.5, 25.3; p=0.02) compared with no incentive (16.6%, 95% CI: 13.7, 19.9). The response increased significantly with increasing incentive amounts from $0.00 to $2.00 cash (p trend<0.0001). The $2.00 bill achieved a 30% greater response than did a $2.00 check (p=0.005). For incentives sent by first-class mail, the $5.00 check yielded 30% greater participation than did the $2.00 check (p=0.07). A $1.00 bill, chosen instead of the $2.00 bill because of substantially lower overall cost and sent by first-class mail to the remaining 42,717 nonresponders, increased response from 64% to 72%.
引用
收藏
页码:643 / 651
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized trial of financial incentives for improving response to a mailed questionnaire.
    Doody, MM
    Kampa, D
    Chimes, K
    Tarone, RE
    Sigurdson, AJ
    Linet, MS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 153 (11) : S82 - S82
  • [2] Dermatologist response rates to a mailed questionnaire: A randomized trial of monetary incentives
    Wan, Joy
    Abuabara, Katrina
    Shin, Daniel B.
    Troxel, Andrea B.
    Bebo, Bruce F., Jr.
    Gelfand, Joel M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 66 (01) : E18 - E20
  • [3] A Randomized trial of incentives to improve response rates to a mailed women's health questionnaire
    Whiteman, MK
    Langenberg, P
    Kjerulff, K
    McCarter, R
    Flaws, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2003, 12 (08) : 821 - 828
  • [4] RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF 2 INCENTIVES TO INCREASE RESPONSE RATE TO A MAILED SURVEY
    PERNEGER, TV
    ETTER, JF
    ROUGEMONT, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 138 (08) : 619 - 619
  • [5] EFFECT OF INCENTIVES AND PERSONAL CONTACT ON RESPONSE RATE TO A MAILED QUESTIONNAIRE
    SHACKLETON, VJ
    WILD, JM
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1982, 50 (02) : 365 - 366
  • [6] Controlled trial of the effect of length, incentives, and follow-up techniques on response to a mailed questionnaire
    Hoffman, SC
    Burke, AE
    Helzlsouer, KJ
    Comstock, GW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 148 (10) : 1007 - 1011
  • [7] Lottery incentives did not improve response rate to a mailed survey: a randomized controlled trial
    Harris, Ian A.
    Khoo, Oliver K.
    Young, Jane M.
    Solomon, Michael J.
    Rae, Hamish
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (06) : 609 - 610
  • [8] Effect of Financial Incentives on Patient Use of Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Mehta, Shivan J.
    Pepe, Rebecca S.
    Gabler, Nicole B.
    Kanneganti, Mounika
    Reitz, Catherine
    Saia, Chelsea
    Teel, Joseph
    Asch, David A.
    Volpp, Kevin G.
    Doubeni, Chyke A.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (03) : e191156
  • [9] Questionnaire color and response rates to mailed surveys - A randomized trial and a meta-analysis
    Etter, JF
    Cucherat, M
    Perneger, TV
    [J]. EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2002, 25 (02) : 185 - 199
  • [10] DIFFERENTIAL-EFFECTS OF INCENTIVES ON RESPONSE ERROR, RESPONSE RATE, AND RELIABILITY OF A MAILED QUESTIONNAIRE
    BROWN, DF
    HARTMAN, B
    [J]. MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN GUIDANCE, 1980, 13 (01): : 20 - 28