Comparison between model-based and data-based methods for fault diagnosis of railway turnouts*

被引:0
|
作者
Ladj, Asma [1 ]
Bouamama, Belkacem Ould [2 ]
Toguyeni, Armand [3 ]
机构
[1] Railenium Res & Technol Inst, F-59540 Valenciennes, France
[2] Polytech Lille, Res Ctr Comp Sci Signal & Automat Control Lille C, CNRS 9189, F-59655 Villeneuve Dascq, France
[3] Cent Lille Inst, Ctr Rech Informat Signal & Automat Lille CRIStAL, F-59000 Lille, France
关键词
D O I
10.1109/CODIT55151.2022.9803886
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Railway switch machines are important elements in a railway network, allowing trains to change directions. Any failure in such safety critical equipment can induce economic losses caused by traffic interruptions and even sometimes catastrophic accidents. Hence, the diagnosis of such failures is recognized to be a primordial task. In the consulted literature, the methods considered are those based on an analytical model or those based on data (artificial intelligence) or hybrid with suitable justifications. The present paper deals with synthesis and discussion of two approaches applied to railway switch machine: Linear Fractional Transformation (LFT) Bond Graph as multiphysic model based robust diagnosis and a data driven method based on k nearest neighbor (kNN) algorithm. A simulation platform is developed to test those two algorithms under various scenarios of faults that may affect the switch machine. Results show that the LFT Bond Graph model based diagnosis whose performances depend mainly on model accuracy is robust with respect to parameters uncertainties and able to detect and isolate the majority of faults, including sensor, plant and actuator faults, while for classification-based diagnosis, even if a good accuracy is achieved with any need of complex equations, a great amount of computational time is devoted to parameters tuning.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 622
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Model-based fault diagnosis of a DC motor
    Blázquez, LF
    de Miguel, LJ
    Perán, JR
    Intelligent Automations and Control: Trends Principles, and Applications, Vol 16, 2004, 16 : 237 - 242
  • [32] Autoregressive model-based gear fault diagnosis
    Wang, Wenyi
    Wong, Albert K.
    Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 2002, 124 (02) : 172 - 179
  • [33] Autoregressive model-based gear fault diagnosis
    Wang, WY
    Wong, AK
    JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2002, 124 (02): : 172 - 179
  • [34] A model-based approach to sequential fault diagnosis
    Pietersma, Jurryt
    van Gemund, Arjan J. C.
    Bos, Andre
    IEEE INSTRUMENTATION & MEASUREMENT MAGAZINE, 2007, 10 (02) : 46 - 52
  • [35] A model-based approach to sequential fault diagnosis
    Pietersma, Jurryt
    van Gemund, Arjan J. C.
    Bos, Andre
    AUTOTESTCON 2005, 2005, : 621 - 627
  • [36] Flutter monitoring using a mixed model-based and data-based approach
    Zouari, R.
    De Troyer, T.
    Mevel, L.
    Basseville, M.
    Guillaume, P.
    PROCEEDINGS OF ISMA 2008: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NOISE AND VIBRATION ENGINEERING, VOLS. 1-8, 2008, : 1265 - 1274
  • [37] A model-based approach to robot fault diagnosis
    Liu, HH
    Coghill, GM
    APPLICATIONS AND INNOVATIONS IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS XII, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 137 - 150
  • [38] Model-based reasoning in compound fault diagnosis
    Ruan, Yue
    Jixie Qiangdu/Journal of Mechanical Strength, 1999, 21 (01): : 4 - 6
  • [39] Bayesian model-based fault diagnosis for the rotor
    Shao Jiye
    Xu Minqiang
    Wang Rixin
    AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 81 (01): : 19 - 24
  • [40] Model-based fault diagnosis for turboshaft engines
    Green, MD
    Duyar, A
    Litt, JS
    (SAFEPROCESS'97): FAULT DETECTION, SUPERVISION AND SAFETY FOR TECHNICAL PROCESSES 1997, VOLS 1-3, 1998, : 73 - 78