Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Local Treatment in Oligometastatic Disease

被引:6
|
作者
Mehrens, Dirk [1 ]
Unterrainer, Marcus [1 ]
Corradini, Stefanie [2 ]
Niyazi, Maximilian [2 ]
Manapov, Farkhad [2 ]
Westphalen, C. Benedikt [3 ]
Froelich, Matthias F. [4 ]
Wildgruber, Moritz [1 ]
Seidensticker, Max [1 ]
Ricke, Jens [1 ]
Ruebenthaler, Johannes [1 ]
Kunz, Wolfgang G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Munich, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Munich, Germany
[3] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Med 3, Munich, Germany
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Mannheim, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Mannheim, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2021年 / 11卷
关键词
OMD; cost-effectiveness (economics); radiation therapy (radiotherapy); cancer; SABR; BODY RADIATION-THERAPY; STEREOTACTIC ABLATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER; HEALTH STATE UTILITIES; CELL LUNG-CANCER; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; COMPREHENSIVE TREATMENT; CHEMOTHERAPY; PROTOCOL; VALUES;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2021.667993
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background In certain malignancies, patients with oligometastatic disease benefit from radical ablative or surgical treatment. The SABR-COMET trial demonstrated a survival benefit for oligometastatic patients randomized to local stereotactic ablative radiation (SABR) compared to patients receiving standard care (SC) alone. Our aim was to determine the cost-effectiveness of SABR. Materials and Methods A decision model based on partitioned survival simulations estimated costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) associated with both strategies in a United States setting from a health care perspective. Analyses were performed over the trial duration of six years as well as a long-term horizon of 16 years. Model input parameters were based on the SABR-COMET trial data as well as best available and most recent data provided in the published literature. An annual discount of 3% for costs was implemented in the analysis. All costs were adjusted to 2019 US Dollars according to the United States Consumer Price Index. SABR costs were reported with an average of $11,700 per treatment. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Incremental costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set to $100,000/QALY. Results Based on increased overall and progression-free survival, the SABR group showed 0.78 incremental QALYs over the trial duration and 1.34 incremental QALYs over the long-term analysis. Treatment with SABR led to a marginal increase in costs compared to SC alone (SABR: $304,656; SC: $303,523 for 6 years; ICER $1,446/QALY and SABR: $402,888; SC: $350,708 for long-term analysis; ICER $38,874/QALY). Therapy with SABR remained cost-effective until treatment costs of $88,969 over the trial duration (i.e. 7.6 times the average cost). Sensitivity analysis identified a strong model impact for ongoing annual costs of oligo- and polymetastatic disease states. Conclusion Our analysis suggests that local treatment with SABR adds QALYs for patients with certain oligometastatic cancers and represents an intermediate- and long-term cost-effective treatment strategy.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY FOR OLIGOMETASTATIC CANCER: A RAPID REVIEW OF THE CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS
    Sutherland, Jill
    Lachance, Chantelle
    Campbell, Kaitryn
    Cooper-Jones, Brit
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 139 : S99 - S99
  • [42] Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Antidepressants in Primary Care: A Multiple Treatment Comparison Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Model
    Ramsberg, Joakim
    Asseburg, Christian
    Henriksson, Martin
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (08):
  • [43] Cost-effectiveness analysis of radiotherapy for patients with Ledderhose disease
    de Haan, A.
    Groen, H.
    van Nes, J. G.
    van der Toorn, P.
    Westenberg, A. H.
    Kolff, M. W.
    Werker, P. M.
    Langendijk, J. A.
    Steenbakkers, R. J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S620 - S621
  • [44] Hospitalization for pelvic inflammatory disease: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Smith, Kenneth J.
    Ness, Roberta B.
    Roberts, Mark S.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2007, 34 (02) : 108 - 112
  • [45] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF PERIODONTAL-DISEASE CONTROL
    ANTCZAKBOUCKOMS, AA
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1987, 7 (04) : 282 - 282
  • [46] The role of imaging in Graves' disease: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Cappelli, C.
    Pirola, I.
    De Martino, E.
    Agosti, B.
    Delbarba, A.
    Castellano, M.
    Rosei, E. Agabiti
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2008, 65 (01) : 99 - 103
  • [47] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF PERIODONTAL-DISEASE CONTROL
    ANTCZAKBOUCKOMS, AA
    WEINSTEIN, MC
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1987, 66 (11) : 1630 - 1635
  • [48] Surgical Revascularization for Moyamoya Disease: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Srinivas, Shanmukha
    Wali, Arvin R.
    Santiago, David
    Brandel, Michael
    Steinberg, Jeffrey
    Rennert, Robert
    Mandeville, Ross
    Murphy, James
    Olson, Scott E.
    Pannell, Jeffrey S.
    Khalessi, Alexander A.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 67 : 96 - 96
  • [49] REVASCULARIZATION FOR FEMOROPOPLITEAL DISEASE - A DECISION AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    HUNINK, MGM
    WONG, JB
    DONALDSON, MC
    MEYEROVITZ, MF
    DEVRIES, J
    HARRINGTON, DP
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (02): : 165 - 171
  • [50] Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Strategies for Diagnosing Celiac Disease
    Spencer D. Dorn
    David B. Matchar
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2008, 53 : 680 - 688