Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Local Treatment in Oligometastatic Disease

被引:6
|
作者
Mehrens, Dirk [1 ]
Unterrainer, Marcus [1 ]
Corradini, Stefanie [2 ]
Niyazi, Maximilian [2 ]
Manapov, Farkhad [2 ]
Westphalen, C. Benedikt [3 ]
Froelich, Matthias F. [4 ]
Wildgruber, Moritz [1 ]
Seidensticker, Max [1 ]
Ricke, Jens [1 ]
Ruebenthaler, Johannes [1 ]
Kunz, Wolfgang G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Munich, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Munich, Germany
[3] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Med 3, Munich, Germany
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Mannheim, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Mannheim, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2021年 / 11卷
关键词
OMD; cost-effectiveness (economics); radiation therapy (radiotherapy); cancer; SABR; BODY RADIATION-THERAPY; STEREOTACTIC ABLATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER; HEALTH STATE UTILITIES; CELL LUNG-CANCER; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; COMPREHENSIVE TREATMENT; CHEMOTHERAPY; PROTOCOL; VALUES;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2021.667993
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background In certain malignancies, patients with oligometastatic disease benefit from radical ablative or surgical treatment. The SABR-COMET trial demonstrated a survival benefit for oligometastatic patients randomized to local stereotactic ablative radiation (SABR) compared to patients receiving standard care (SC) alone. Our aim was to determine the cost-effectiveness of SABR. Materials and Methods A decision model based on partitioned survival simulations estimated costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) associated with both strategies in a United States setting from a health care perspective. Analyses were performed over the trial duration of six years as well as a long-term horizon of 16 years. Model input parameters were based on the SABR-COMET trial data as well as best available and most recent data provided in the published literature. An annual discount of 3% for costs was implemented in the analysis. All costs were adjusted to 2019 US Dollars according to the United States Consumer Price Index. SABR costs were reported with an average of $11,700 per treatment. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Incremental costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set to $100,000/QALY. Results Based on increased overall and progression-free survival, the SABR group showed 0.78 incremental QALYs over the trial duration and 1.34 incremental QALYs over the long-term analysis. Treatment with SABR led to a marginal increase in costs compared to SC alone (SABR: $304,656; SC: $303,523 for 6 years; ICER $1,446/QALY and SABR: $402,888; SC: $350,708 for long-term analysis; ICER $38,874/QALY). Therapy with SABR remained cost-effective until treatment costs of $88,969 over the trial duration (i.e. 7.6 times the average cost). Sensitivity analysis identified a strong model impact for ongoing annual costs of oligo- and polymetastatic disease states. Conclusion Our analysis suggests that local treatment with SABR adds QALYs for patients with certain oligometastatic cancers and represents an intermediate- and long-term cost-effective treatment strategy.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatment of mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease in Brazil
    da Silva, Luciana R.
    Vianna, Cid M. M.
    Mosegui, Gabriela B. G.
    Peregrino, Antonio A. F.
    Marinho, Valeska
    Laks, Jerson
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 41 (03) : 218 - 224
  • [32] Common treatment strategies for calcium hydroxyapatite deposition disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Alaia, Erin F.
    Subhas, Naveen
    Cardoso, Madalena Da Silva
    Li, Zachary I.
    Shah, Mehul R.
    Alaia, Michael J.
    Gyftopoulos, Soterios
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 53 (03) : 437 - 444
  • [33] Common treatment strategies for calcium hydroxyapatite deposition disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Erin F. Alaia
    Naveen Subhas
    Madalena Da Silva Cardoso
    Zachary I. Li
    Mehul R. Shah
    Michael J. Alaia
    Soterios Gyftopoulos
    Skeletal Radiology, 2024, 53 : 437 - 444
  • [34] Deep brain stimulation in the treatment of Parkinson's disease - A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Tomaszewski, KJ
    Holloway, RG
    NEUROLOGY, 2001, 57 (04) : 663 - 671
  • [35] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE WITH LOW PROTEIN DIET
    Mennini, Francesco
    Russo, Simone
    Marcellusi, Andrea
    Quintaliani, Giuseppe
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 28 : 164 - 164
  • [36] Cost-effectiveness analysis
    Stein, Sherman C.
    Malhotra, Neil R.
    Burnett, Mark G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 20 (04) : 474 - 474
  • [37] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    GANIATS, TG
    PRIMARY CARE, 1995, 22 (02): : 307 - 318
  • [38] Cost-effectiveness analysis
    Yates, BT
    EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2002, 25 (02) : 201 - 202
  • [39] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    BALAKRISHNA, S
    JOURNAL OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 1992, 11 (05) : 701 - 703
  • [40] Local metastasis treatment in oligometastatic disease
    Dunst, Juergen
    Baumann, Rene
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2018, 194 (05) : 465 - 467