Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Local Treatment in Oligometastatic Disease

被引:6
|
作者
Mehrens, Dirk [1 ]
Unterrainer, Marcus [1 ]
Corradini, Stefanie [2 ]
Niyazi, Maximilian [2 ]
Manapov, Farkhad [2 ]
Westphalen, C. Benedikt [3 ]
Froelich, Matthias F. [4 ]
Wildgruber, Moritz [1 ]
Seidensticker, Max [1 ]
Ricke, Jens [1 ]
Ruebenthaler, Johannes [1 ]
Kunz, Wolfgang G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Munich, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Munich, Germany
[3] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Med 3, Munich, Germany
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Mannheim, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Mannheim, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2021年 / 11卷
关键词
OMD; cost-effectiveness (economics); radiation therapy (radiotherapy); cancer; SABR; BODY RADIATION-THERAPY; STEREOTACTIC ABLATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER; HEALTH STATE UTILITIES; CELL LUNG-CANCER; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; COMPREHENSIVE TREATMENT; CHEMOTHERAPY; PROTOCOL; VALUES;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2021.667993
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background In certain malignancies, patients with oligometastatic disease benefit from radical ablative or surgical treatment. The SABR-COMET trial demonstrated a survival benefit for oligometastatic patients randomized to local stereotactic ablative radiation (SABR) compared to patients receiving standard care (SC) alone. Our aim was to determine the cost-effectiveness of SABR. Materials and Methods A decision model based on partitioned survival simulations estimated costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) associated with both strategies in a United States setting from a health care perspective. Analyses were performed over the trial duration of six years as well as a long-term horizon of 16 years. Model input parameters were based on the SABR-COMET trial data as well as best available and most recent data provided in the published literature. An annual discount of 3% for costs was implemented in the analysis. All costs were adjusted to 2019 US Dollars according to the United States Consumer Price Index. SABR costs were reported with an average of $11,700 per treatment. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Incremental costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set to $100,000/QALY. Results Based on increased overall and progression-free survival, the SABR group showed 0.78 incremental QALYs over the trial duration and 1.34 incremental QALYs over the long-term analysis. Treatment with SABR led to a marginal increase in costs compared to SC alone (SABR: $304,656; SC: $303,523 for 6 years; ICER $1,446/QALY and SABR: $402,888; SC: $350,708 for long-term analysis; ICER $38,874/QALY). Therapy with SABR remained cost-effective until treatment costs of $88,969 over the trial duration (i.e. 7.6 times the average cost). Sensitivity analysis identified a strong model impact for ongoing annual costs of oligo- and polymetastatic disease states. Conclusion Our analysis suggests that local treatment with SABR adds QALYs for patients with certain oligometastatic cancers and represents an intermediate- and long-term cost-effective treatment strategy.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Local Ablation and Surgery for Liver Metastases of Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Froelich, Matthias F.
    Schnitzer, Moritz L.
    Rathmann, Nils
    Tollens, Fabian
    Unterrainer, Marcus
    Rennebaum, Shereen
    Seidensticker, Max
    Ricke, Jens
    Rubenthaler, Johannes
    Kunz, Wolfgang G.
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (07)
  • [2] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cardiovascular Disease Treatment in Japan
    Kodera, Satoshi
    Kiyosue, Arihiro
    Ando, Jiro
    Akazawa, Hiroshi
    Morita, Hiroyuki
    Watanabe, Masafumi
    Komuro, Issei
    INTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL, 2017, 58 (06) : 847 - 852
  • [3] Treatment Options for Graves Disease: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    In, Haejin
    Pearce, Elizabeth N.
    Wong, Arthur K.
    Burgess, James F.
    McAneny, David B.
    Rosen, Jennifer E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 209 (02) : 170 - 179
  • [4] Treatment options for Graves' Disease: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    In, Haejin
    Pearce, Elizabeth N.
    Wong, Arthur K. G.
    McAneny, David B.
    Rosen, Jennifer E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2008, 207 (03) : S78 - S78
  • [5] Is all cost-effectiveness analysis local?
    Russell, Louise B.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2007, 27 (03) : 231 - 232
  • [6] Prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease in Ethiopia: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Tolla, Mieraf Taddesse
    Norheim, Ole Frithjof
    Memirie, Solomon Tessema
    Abdisa, Senbeta Guteta
    Ababulgu, Awel
    Jerene, Degu
    Bertram, Melanie
    Strand, Kirsten
    Verguet, Stephane
    Johansson, Kjell Arne
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2016, 14
  • [7] Prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease in Ethiopia: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Mieraf Taddesse Tolla
    Ole Frithjof Norheim
    Solomon Tessema Memirie
    Senbeta Guteta Abdisa
    Awel Ababulgu
    Degu Jerene
    Melanie Bertram
    Kirsten Strand
    Stéphane Verguet
    Kjell Arne Johansson
    Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 14
  • [8] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF ANTIEMETIC TREATMENT
    BLEIBERG, H
    AUTIER, P
    MICHAUX, D
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 1994, 2 (03) : 145 - 149
  • [9] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Oligometastatic Tumors versus Standard of Care
    Raymakers, Adam J. N.
    Cameron, David
    Tyldesley, Scott
    Regier, Dean A.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) : 1857 - 1866
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness analysis of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in patients with oligometastatic cancer.
    Kumar, Abhishek
    Straka, Christopher Andrew
    Vitzthum, Lucas
    Cherry, Daniel R.
    Courtney, Patrick T.
    Riviere, Paul
    Murphy, James Don
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)