Developing an ethical approach evaluation scale for psychiatric patients

被引:0
|
作者
Ozalp, Gizem [1 ]
Arabaci, Leyla Baysan [2 ]
机构
[1] Gendarmerie & Coast Guard Acad, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Izmir Katip Celebi Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Mental Hlth & Psychiat Nursing, Izmir, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC NURSING | 2022年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
Ethics; psychiatric nursing; scale; validity and reliability; VALIDITY; ATTITUDE; NURSES;
D O I
10.14744/phd.2022.35582
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study aimed to develop a scale to evaluate the ethical approaches of health professionals working in psychiatry units toward psychiatric patients and to conduct a validity-reliability study for this scale.Methods: The research data that was planned methodologically were collected from 316 nurses working in four differ-ent regional psychiatric hospitals between February 2020 and February 2021. While collecting research data, "Descriptive Information Form" and the "Ethical Approach Toward Psychiatric Patients Evaluation Scale" were used. The draft scale, consisting of 48 items, took its final form consisting of 27 items as a result of the required validity and reliability studies. In the development process of the scale, the Lawshe technique, explanatory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, test-retest reliability, Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient, and item-total correlation analyzes were performed.Results: As a result of the exploratory factor analysis, the scale developed by the researchers based on the relevant liter-ature took its final form with four subdimensions of authoritarian, protective-altruistic, normative, and social distance. It was determined that the model data fit of the tested data was quite high based on the results of the confirmatory factor analysis (GFI=0.96, AGFI=0.95, RMSEA=0.068, SRMR=0.071, and chi-square/df=775.06/316=2.452). Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients of the Ethical Approach Toward Psychiatric Patients Evaluation Scale were as follows: alpha au-=0.84, alpha =0.74, alpha =0.76, alpha =0.70, and alpha EAPPES=0.88. The estimated test-retest reliability thoritarian protective-altruistic normative social distance coefficients for the whole scale and its subdimensions were as follows: rEAPPES=0.93 rauthoritarian=0.94, rprotective-altruistic=0.79, rnormative=0.83, and rsocial distance=0.72.Conclusion: As a result of these data, it was determined that the "Ethical Approach Toward Psychiatric Patients Evalu-ation Scale" is a valid and reliable scale.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 252
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Medical Evaluation of Patients Prior to a Psychiatric Hospitalization: A Clinical Pathway Approach
    Kohen, Izchak
    Farahani, Arusha
    Veksman, Adele
    Manu, Peter
    [J]. CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REVIEWS, 2010, 6 (04) : 252 - 256
  • [22] The development and psychometric evaluation of the ethical issues scale
    Fry, ST
    Duffy, ME
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2001, 33 (03) : 273 - 277
  • [23] Methods of Influencing the Decisions of Psychiatric Patients: An Ethical Analysis
    Blumenthal-Barby, J. S.
    McCullough, Laurence B.
    Krieger, Heather
    Coverdale, John
    [J]. HARVARD REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 21 (05) : 275 - 279
  • [24] Ethical and forensic psychiatric contributions to living organ donors' evaluation
    Jung, H.
    Egyed-Zsigmond, I
    Ardelean, M.
    Branzaniuc, K.
    [J]. IALM 2012: PRESENTATIONS FROM THE 22ND CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2013, : 239 - 241
  • [25] The evaluation of psychiatric professionals by the relatives of psychiatric patients
    Kramer, B
    Simon, M
    [J]. PSYCHIATRISCHE PRAXIS, 1996, 23 (01) : 29 - 32
  • [26] Developing a Pay Scale for Security Guards: 5-Point Factor Evaluation Approach
    Adetula, Gabriel Agboola
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED SECURITY RESEARCH, 2016, 11 (01) : 33 - 43
  • [27] EVALUATION OF PSYCHIATRIC AFTERCARE IN A DEVELOPING-COUNTRY (FIJI)
    PRICE, J
    KARIM, I
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1976, 129 (AUG) : 155 - 157
  • [28] Social-adaptive functioning evaluation (SAFE): A rating scale for geriatric psychiatric patients
    Harvey, PD
    Davidson, M
    Mueser, KT
    Parrella, M
    White, L
    Powchik, P
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 1997, 23 (01) : 131 - +
  • [29] SOCIAL FUNCTIONING IN PSYCHIATRIC-PATIENTS - EVALUATION OF A MODIFIED VERSION OF THE GAF-SCALE
    MEINS, W
    JACOBSEN, G
    STRATMANN, C
    [J]. PSYCHIATRISCHE PRAXIS, 1995, 22 (05) : 206 - 208
  • [30] Reflexive Principlism as an Effective Approach for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering
    Beever, Jonathan
    Brightman, Andrew O.
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2016, 22 (01) : 275 - 291