Reflexive Principlism as an Effective Approach for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering

被引:32
|
作者
Beever, Jonathan [1 ]
Brightman, Andrew O. [2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Rock Eth Inst, 131 Sparks Bldg, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Weldon Sch Biomed Engn, Martin Jischke Dr, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Reflexive principlism; Ethical reasoning; Moral framework; Reflectivity; Engineering ethics; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11948-015-9633-5
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
An important goal of teaching ethics to engineering students is to enhance their ability to make well-reasoned ethical decisions in their engineering practice: a goal in line with the stated ethical codes of professional engineering organizations. While engineering educators have explored a wide range of methodologies for teaching ethics, a satisfying model for developing ethical reasoning skills has not been adopted broadly. In this paper we argue that a principlist-based approach to ethical reasoning is uniquely suited to engineering ethics education. Reflexive Principlism is an approach to ethical decision-making that focuses on internalizing a reflective and iterative process of specification, balancing, and justification of four core ethical principles in the context of specific cases. In engineering, that approach provides structure to ethical reasoning while allowing the flexibility for adaptation to varying contexts through specification. Reflexive Principlism integrates well with the prevalent and familiar methodologies of reasoning within the engineering disciplines as well as with the goals of engineering ethics education.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 291
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reflexive Principlism as an Effective Approach for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering
    Jonathan Beever
    Andrew O. Brightman
    [J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2016, 22 : 275 - 291
  • [2] Enhancing engineering students' ethical reasoning: Situating reflexive principlism within the SIRA framework
    Hess, Justin L.
    Beever, Jonathan
    Zoltowski, Carla B.
    Kisselburgh, Lorraine
    Brightman, Andrew O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2019, 108 (01) : 82 - 102
  • [3] An Ethics Transfer Case Assessment Tool for Measuring Ethical Reasoning Abilities of Engineering Students Using Reflexive Principlism Approach
    Hess, Justin L.
    Beever, Jonathan
    Iliadis, Andrew
    Kisselburgh, Lorraine G.
    Zoltowski, Carla B.
    Krane, Matthew J. M.
    Brightman, Andrew O.
    [J]. 2014 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2014,
  • [4] Tissue Engineering: An Ethical Approach in the Perspective of Principlism and Utilitarianism
    Leabu, M.
    [J]. 5TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION FOR MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2012, 37 : 1291 - 1295
  • [5] Dialectical Principlism: An Approach to Finding the Most Ethical Action
    Weinstock, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW, 2015, 43 (01): : 10 - 20
  • [6] Extended Principlism Approach to Software Engineering Ethics
    Saleh, Kassem
    [J]. 2024 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION COMMUNICATION AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, ICICSE 2024, 2024, : 51 - 54
  • [7] Developing a Reflexive, Anticipatory, and Deliberative Approach to Unanticipated Discoveries: Ethical Lessons from iBlastoids
    Ankeny, Rachel A.
    Munsie, Megan J.
    Leach, Joan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2022, 22 (01): : 36 - 45
  • [8] Generic reflective feedback: An effective approach to developing clinical reasoning skills
    Wojcikowski, K.
    Brownie, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2013, 29 (04) : 371 - 382
  • [9] Utilizing an Engineering Ethical Reasoning Instrument in the Curriculum
    Zoltowski, Carla B.
    Buzzanell, Patrice Marie
    Oakes, William C.
    [J]. 2013 ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 2013,
  • [10] Auditors' ethical reasoning in developing countries: the case of Egypt
    Abdelhak, Engy E.
    Elamer, Ahmed A.
    AiHares, Aws
    McLaughlin, Craig
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ETHICS AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 35 (04) : 558 - 583