Numerical investigation of a joint approach to thermal energy storage and compressed air energy storage in aquifers

被引:35
|
作者
Guo, Chaobin [1 ,4 ]
Zhang, Keni [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Lehua [2 ]
Cai, Zuansi [3 ]
Li, Cai [4 ]
Li, Yi [5 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
[2] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Earth & Environm Sci Area, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Sch Engn & Built Environm, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Chinese Acad Geol Sci, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Water Sci, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
关键词
Compressed air energy storage; Aquifer; Thermal energy storage; Injection air temperature; CAES PLANT; TEMPERATURE; CAVERNS; SYSTEM; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION; EFFICIENCY; RECOVERY; GAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.030
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Different from conventional compressed air energy storage (CAES) systems, the advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage (AA-CAES) system can store the compression heat which can be used to reheat air during the electricity generation stage. Thus, AA-CAES system can achieve a higher energy storage efficiency. Similar to the AA-CAES system, a compressed air energy storage in aquifers (CAESA) system, which is integrated with an aquifer thermal energy storage (ATES) could possibly achieve the same objective. In order to investigate the impact of ATES on the performance of CAESA, different injection air temperature schemes are designed and analyzed by using numerical simulations. Key parameters relative to energy recovery efficiencies of the different injection schemes, such as pressure distribution and temperature variation within the aquifers as well as energy flow rate in the injection well, are also investigated in this study. The simulations show that, although different injection schemes have a similar overall energy recovery efficiency (similar to 97%) as well as a thermal energy recovery efficiency (similar to 79.2%), the higher injection air temperature has a higher energy storage capability. Our results show the total energy storage for the injection air temperature at 80 degrees C is about 10% greater than the base model scheme at 40 degrees C. Sensitivity analysis reveal that permeability of the reservoir boundary could have significant impact on the system performance. However, other hydrodynamic and thermodynamic properties, such as the storage reservoir permeability, thermal conductivity, rock grain specific heat and rock grain density, have little impact on storage capability and the energy flow rate. Overall, our study suggests that the combination of ATES and CAESA can help keep the high efficiency of energy storage so as to make CAESA system more efficiency. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:948 / 958
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] TRANSFER OF ENERGY BY STORAGE OF COMPRESSED AIR
    FLEURY, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1976, 16 (02): : 308 - 315
  • [32] An enhanced role understanding of geothermal energy on compressed air energy storage in aquifers considering the underground processes
    Li, Yi
    Sun, Ruikang
    Li, Yi
    Hu, Bin
    Dong, Jiawei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2021, 44
  • [33] Off-design Performance of Compressed Air Energy Storage System With Thermal Storage
    Guo, Huan
    Xu, Yujie
    Zhang, Xinjing
    Guo, Cong
    Chen, Haisheng
    [J]. Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2019, 39 (05): : 1366 - 1376
  • [34] Concise analytical solution and optimization of compressed air energy storage systems with thermal storage
    Guo, Huan
    Xu, Yujie
    Huang, Lujing
    Zhu, Yilin
    Liang, Qi
    Chen, Haisheng
    [J]. ENERGY, 2022, 258
  • [35] REGULATORY FRAMEWORK BENCHMARK FOR ENERGY STORAGE: THE CASE OF COMPRESSED AIR ENERGY STORAGE
    Matos, Catarina R.
    Silva, Patricia P.
    Carneiro, Julio F.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT (ICEE 2019): BRINGING TOGETHER ENGINEERING AND ECONOMICS, 2019, : 451 - 461
  • [36] Overview of compressed air energy storage projects and regulatory framework for energy storage
    Matos, Catarina R.
    Silva, Patricia P.
    Carneiro, Julio F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2022, 55
  • [37] Thermodynamic analysis of a hybrid system combining compressed air energy storage and pressurized water thermal energy storage
    He, Xin
    Wang, Huanran
    Ge, Gangqiang
    Liu, Yitong
    Zhang, Yufei
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 229
  • [38] Numerical and experimental investigation of static shaft Wankel expander for compressed-air energy storage
    Lomiga, Jonri
    Taskin, Anil
    Al-Dadah, Raya
    Mahmoud, Saad
    Aziz, Andrew N.
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 299
  • [39] DESIGN OF A MODULAR SOLID-BASED THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE FOR A HYBRID COMPRESSED AIR ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM
    Lakeh, Reza Baghaei
    Villazana, Ian C.
    Houssainy, Sammy
    Anderson, Kevin R.
    Kavehpour, H. Pirouz
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, VOL 2, 2016,
  • [40] Inter-seasonal compressed-air energy storage using saline aquifers
    Julien Mouli-Castillo
    Mark Wilkinson
    Dimitri Mignard
    Christopher McDermott
    R. Stuart Haszeldine
    Zoe K. Shipton
    [J]. Nature Energy, 2019, 4 : 131 - 139