Numerical investigation of a joint approach to thermal energy storage and compressed air energy storage in aquifers

被引:35
|
作者
Guo, Chaobin [1 ,4 ]
Zhang, Keni [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Lehua [2 ]
Cai, Zuansi [3 ]
Li, Cai [4 ]
Li, Yi [5 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
[2] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Earth & Environm Sci Area, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Sch Engn & Built Environm, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Chinese Acad Geol Sci, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Water Sci, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
关键词
Compressed air energy storage; Aquifer; Thermal energy storage; Injection air temperature; CAES PLANT; TEMPERATURE; CAVERNS; SYSTEM; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION; EFFICIENCY; RECOVERY; GAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.030
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Different from conventional compressed air energy storage (CAES) systems, the advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage (AA-CAES) system can store the compression heat which can be used to reheat air during the electricity generation stage. Thus, AA-CAES system can achieve a higher energy storage efficiency. Similar to the AA-CAES system, a compressed air energy storage in aquifers (CAESA) system, which is integrated with an aquifer thermal energy storage (ATES) could possibly achieve the same objective. In order to investigate the impact of ATES on the performance of CAESA, different injection air temperature schemes are designed and analyzed by using numerical simulations. Key parameters relative to energy recovery efficiencies of the different injection schemes, such as pressure distribution and temperature variation within the aquifers as well as energy flow rate in the injection well, are also investigated in this study. The simulations show that, although different injection schemes have a similar overall energy recovery efficiency (similar to 97%) as well as a thermal energy recovery efficiency (similar to 79.2%), the higher injection air temperature has a higher energy storage capability. Our results show the total energy storage for the injection air temperature at 80 degrees C is about 10% greater than the base model scheme at 40 degrees C. Sensitivity analysis reveal that permeability of the reservoir boundary could have significant impact on the system performance. However, other hydrodynamic and thermodynamic properties, such as the storage reservoir permeability, thermal conductivity, rock grain specific heat and rock grain density, have little impact on storage capability and the energy flow rate. Overall, our study suggests that the combination of ATES and CAESA can help keep the high efficiency of energy storage so as to make CAESA system more efficiency. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:948 / 958
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SOME HYDRODYNAMIC ASPECTS OF COMPRESSED-AIR ENERGY-STORAGE IN AQUIFERS
    BRAESTER, C
    BEAR, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1984, 73 (3-4) : 201 - 225
  • [22] The promise and challenges of utility-scale compressed air energy storage in aquifers
    Guo, Chaobin
    Li, Cai
    Zhang, Keni
    Cai, Zuansi
    Ma, Tianran
    Maggi, Federico
    Gan, Yixiang
    El-Zein, Abbas
    Pan, Zhejun
    Shen, Luming
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2021, 286
  • [23] Numerical verification on the feasibility of compressed carbon dioxide energy storage in two aquifers
    Li, Yi
    Yu, Hao
    Xiao, Yanling
    Li, Yi
    Liu, Yinjiang
    Luo, Xian
    Tang, Dong
    Zhang, Guijin
    Liu, Yaning
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2023, 207 : 743 - 764
  • [24] EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT OF COMPRESSED AIR ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM COUPLED WITH THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE UNIT: REVIEW
    Assegie, Mebratu Adamu
    Siram, Ojing
    Kalita, Pankaj
    Sahoo, Niranjan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 GAS TURBINE INDIA CONFERENCE, GTINDIA2023, 2023,
  • [25] A trigeneration system based on compressed air and thermal energy storage
    Li, Yongliang
    Wang, Xiang
    Li, Dacheng
    Ding, Yulong
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2012, 99 : 316 - 323
  • [26] Thermal analysis of a compressor for application to Compressed Air Energy Storage
    Zhang, C.
    Yan, B.
    Wieberdink, J.
    Li, P. Y.
    Van de Ven, J. D.
    Loth, E.
    Simon, T. W.
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 73 (02) : 1402 - 1411
  • [27] Compressed air energy storage system
    Saruta, Hiroki
    Sato, Takashi
    Nakamichi, Ryo
    Toshima, Masatake
    Kubo, Yohei
    [J]. R and D: Research and Development Kobe Steel Engineering Reports, 2020, 70 (01): : 42 - 46
  • [28] COMPRESSED AIR ENERGY-STORAGE
    VOSBURGH, KG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY, 1978, 2 (02): : 106 - 112
  • [29] Compressed Air Energy Storage Systems
    Milewski, Jaroslaw
    Badyda, Krzysztof
    Szablowski, Lukasz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POWER TECHNOLOGIES, 2016, 96 (04): : 245 - 260
  • [30] The return of compressed air energy storage
    Patel, Sonal
    [J]. POWER, 2008, 152 (10) : 10 - +