Combining volume-weighted mean nuclear volume with Gleason score and clinical stage to predict more reliably disease outcome of patients with prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Fujikawa, K
Sasaki, M
Itoh, T
Arai, Y
Ogawa, O
Yoshida, O
机构
[1] Kobe City Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, Chuo Ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650, Japan
[2] Shizuoka City Hosp, Dept Urol, Shizuoka, Japan
[3] Shizuoka City Hosp, Dept Pathol, Shizuoka, Japan
[4] Kurashiki Cent Hosp, Dept Urol, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
[5] Kyoto Univ Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 606, Japan
来源
PROSTATE | 1998年 / 37卷 / 02期
关键词
mean nuclear volume; prostate cancer; Gleason score; prognostic index;
D O I
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(19981001)37:2<63::AID-PROS1>3.0.CO;2-M
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Various criteria for patients with prostate cancer have been reported to be of prognostic value, and we have reported that estimates of volume-weighted mean nuclear volume (MNV), developed by Gundersen and Jensen based on a stereological technique, accurately predict the prognosis of prostate cancer. However, all of these studies were con ducted on cases in a single institution, and it has remained unclear whether MNV calculations obtained at one institution apply to cases at another institution. Ln attempting to solve this problem, we made a prognostic index (P.I.) based on data from one hospital, and tested whether these data could be used to predict the prognosis of patients at another hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective, multivariate prognostic study of 195 patients with prostate cancer, diagnosed at Kyoto University Hospital and treated conservatively, indicated that clinical stage, Gleason score, and MNV were all significantly correlated with the prognosis of patients with prostate cancer. From the relative strengths of these prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis, the following P.I. was constructed: P.I. = Clinical stage x 1.8040 + Gleason score x 1.5245 + MNV x 2.3162 (the constants correspond to the risk ratio estimated by Cox analysis). The P.I. was calculated for 104 patients with prostate cancer diagnosed at Shizuoka City Hospital and treated conservatively for analysis of disease-specific survival. RESULTS. The prognostic index ranged from 3.841-16.142. Using the median value of 12.5 as a cutoff point, a clear separation of cases with poor and favorable prognosis was achieved (P < 0.0001, observation period: 1-167 months). CONCLUSIONS. The results of this study suggest that estimates of MNV can be evaluated at multiple institutions with the use of P.I. calculation. Furthermore, combining estimates of MNV with Gleason score and clinical stage predicts most powerfully disease outcome of patients with prostate cancer. (C) 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 69
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given PSA, clinical stage, and biopsy gleason score (partin tables) based on cases from 2000-2005
    Makarov, Danil V.
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Humphreys, Elizabeth B.
    Mangold, Lesie A.
    Walsh, Patrick C.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Partin, Alan W.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 112 - 112
  • [32] Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005
    Makarov, Danil V.
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Humphreys, Elizabeth B.
    Mangold, Leslie A.
    Walsh, Patrick C.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Partin, Alan W.
    UROLOGY, 2007, 69 (06) : 1095 - 1101
  • [33] Clinical utility of endorectal MRI in determining PSA outcome for patients with biopsy Gleason score 7, PSA≤10, and clinically localized prostate cancer
    Cheng, GC
    Chen, MH
    Whittington, R
    Malkowicz, SB
    Schnall, MD
    Tomaszewski, JE
    D'Amico, AV
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 55 (01): : 64 - 70
  • [34] Re: Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005
    Makarov, D., V
    Trock, B. J.
    Humphreys, E. B.
    Mangold, L. A.
    Walsh, P. C.
    Epstein, J., I
    Partin, A. W.
    Kattan, Michael W.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 52 (05) : 1528 - 1528
  • [35] Clinical stage, prostate-specific antigen and gleason grade to predict extracapsular disease or nodal metastasis in men with newly diagnosed, previously untreated prostate cancer - A multicenter study
    Puppo, P
    Perachino, M
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1997, 32 (03) : 273 - 279
  • [36] OLDER AGE AT DIAGNOSIS AND DISEASE VOLUME PREDICT UPGRADING ON CONFIRMATORY BIOPSY IN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS BEING CONSIDERED FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Dai, Charles
    Ganesan, Vishnu
    Almassi, Nima
    Nyame, Yaw
    Greene, Daniel
    Hettel, Daniel
    Crane, Alice
    Zabell, Joseph
    Zampini, Anna
    Haywood, Samuel
    Arora, Hans
    Reichard, Chad
    El-Shafei, Ahmed
    Stein, Robert
    Fareed, Khaled
    Gong, Michael
    Jones, J. Stephen
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    Klein, Eric
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E1055 - E1056
  • [37] High-volume online haemodiafiltration treatment and outcome of end-stage renal disease patients: more than one mode
    Schiffl, Helmut
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2020, 52 (08) : 1501 - 1506
  • [38] High-volume online haemodiafiltration treatment and outcome of end-stage renal disease patients: more than one mode
    Helmut Schiffl
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2020, 52 : 1501 - 1506
  • [39] Pre-biopsy prostate-specific antigen velocity does not predict gleason score, tumor location or cancer volume following transperineal-template guided prostate mapping biopsy: Implications for prostate brachytherapy treatment planning
    Bittner, N.
    Merrick, G. S.
    Wallner, K. E.
    Butler, W. M.
    Anderson, R. L.
    Allen, Z. A.
    Adamovich, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : S334 - S334
  • [40] A NEW SURGICAL OUTCOME SCORE (SOS) INCLUDING HE4, CA125 AND ASCITES VOLUME CAN PREDICT SURGICAL OUTCOME IN PRIMARY OVARIAN CANCER PATIENTS.
    Braicu, E.
    van Gorp, T.
    Richter, R.
    Nassir, M.
    Zeillinger, R.
    Conicn, N.
    Tong, D. Cacsire Castillo
    Mahner, S.
    Vergote, I.
    Sehouli, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2013, 23 (08)