Combining volume-weighted mean nuclear volume with Gleason score and clinical stage to predict more reliably disease outcome of patients with prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Fujikawa, K
Sasaki, M
Itoh, T
Arai, Y
Ogawa, O
Yoshida, O
机构
[1] Kobe City Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, Chuo Ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650, Japan
[2] Shizuoka City Hosp, Dept Urol, Shizuoka, Japan
[3] Shizuoka City Hosp, Dept Pathol, Shizuoka, Japan
[4] Kurashiki Cent Hosp, Dept Urol, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
[5] Kyoto Univ Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 606, Japan
来源
PROSTATE | 1998年 / 37卷 / 02期
关键词
mean nuclear volume; prostate cancer; Gleason score; prognostic index;
D O I
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(19981001)37:2<63::AID-PROS1>3.0.CO;2-M
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Various criteria for patients with prostate cancer have been reported to be of prognostic value, and we have reported that estimates of volume-weighted mean nuclear volume (MNV), developed by Gundersen and Jensen based on a stereological technique, accurately predict the prognosis of prostate cancer. However, all of these studies were con ducted on cases in a single institution, and it has remained unclear whether MNV calculations obtained at one institution apply to cases at another institution. Ln attempting to solve this problem, we made a prognostic index (P.I.) based on data from one hospital, and tested whether these data could be used to predict the prognosis of patients at another hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective, multivariate prognostic study of 195 patients with prostate cancer, diagnosed at Kyoto University Hospital and treated conservatively, indicated that clinical stage, Gleason score, and MNV were all significantly correlated with the prognosis of patients with prostate cancer. From the relative strengths of these prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis, the following P.I. was constructed: P.I. = Clinical stage x 1.8040 + Gleason score x 1.5245 + MNV x 2.3162 (the constants correspond to the risk ratio estimated by Cox analysis). The P.I. was calculated for 104 patients with prostate cancer diagnosed at Shizuoka City Hospital and treated conservatively for analysis of disease-specific survival. RESULTS. The prognostic index ranged from 3.841-16.142. Using the median value of 12.5 as a cutoff point, a clear separation of cases with poor and favorable prognosis was achieved (P < 0.0001, observation period: 1-167 months). CONCLUSIONS. The results of this study suggest that estimates of MNV can be evaluated at multiple institutions with the use of P.I. calculation. Furthermore, combining estimates of MNV with Gleason score and clinical stage predicts most powerfully disease outcome of patients with prostate cancer. (C) 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 69
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] USE OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, CLINICAL STAGE AND GLEASON SCORE TO PREDICT PATHOLOGICAL STAGE IN MEN WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER - REPLY
    PARTIN, AW
    YOO, J
    CARTER, HB
    PEARSON, JD
    CHAN, DW
    EPSTEIN, JI
    WALSH, PC
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (06): : 1924 - 1924
  • [22] USE OF NUCLEAR MORPHOMETRY, GLEASON HISTOLOGIC SCORING, CLINICAL STAGE, AND AGE TO PREDICT DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL AMONG PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE-CANCER
    PARTIN, AW
    STEINBERG, GD
    PITCOCK, RV
    WU, L
    PIANTADOSI, S
    COFFEY, DS
    EPSTEIN, JI
    CANCER, 1992, 70 (01) : 161 - 168
  • [23] Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer - A multi-institutional update
    Partin, AW
    Kattan, MW
    Subong, ENP
    Walsh, PC
    Wojno, KJ
    Oesterling, JE
    Scardino, PT
    Pearson, JD
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (18): : 1445 - 1451
  • [24] Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer - A multi-institutional update
    Partin, AW
    Kattan, MW
    Subong, EN
    Walsh, PC
    Wojno, KJ
    Oesterling, JE
    Scardino, PT
    Pearson, JD
    Graefen, M
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2004, 35 (05) : 377 - 378
  • [25] Negative repeat biopsy of prostate cancer patients predicts for low volume, low stage disease
    Sircar, K
    Scardino, PT
    Ohori, M
    Reuter, VE
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2002, 15 (01) : 181A - 182A
  • [26] Negative repeat biopsy of prostate cancer patients predicts for low volume, low stage disease
    Sircar, K
    Scardino, PT
    Ohori, M
    Reuter, VE
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2002, 82 (01) : 181A - 182A
  • [27] Mean Per-Core Biopsy Volume as a Predictor of Failure for Gleason 7 Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing High-dose-rate
    Marina, O.
    Gustafson, G. S.
    Brabbins, D. S.
    Wallace, M.
    Martinez, A. A.
    Ghilezan, M. I.
    Ye, H.
    Krauss, D. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S374 - S374
  • [28] Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer: A multi-institutional update (vol 277, pg 1445, 1997)
    Partin, AW
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 278 (02): : 118 - 118
  • [29] Baseline and changes in atheroma volume predict clinical outcome in patients with coronary artery disease: Insights from ILLUSTRATE
    Nicholls, Stephen J.
    Hsu, Amy
    Brennan, Danielle M.
    Kalidindi, Srinivasa R.
    Moon, Keon-Woong
    Tuzcu, E. Murat
    Nissen, Steven E.
    CIRCULATION, 2007, 116 (16) : 750 - 750
  • [30] Patients with a single microfocus (≤ 5%) of Gleason 6 prostate cancer at biopsy:: Can we predict more aggressive disease at the time of surgery?
    Katz, Mark H.
    Zorn, Kevin C.
    Eng, Michael K.
    Bernstein, Andrew J.
    Shikanov, Sergey A.
    Shalhav, Arieh L.
    Zagaja, Gregory P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 198 - 198