Combining volume-weighted mean nuclear volume with Gleason score and clinical stage to predict more reliably disease outcome of patients with prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Fujikawa, K
Sasaki, M
Itoh, T
Arai, Y
Ogawa, O
Yoshida, O
机构
[1] Kobe City Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, Chuo Ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650, Japan
[2] Shizuoka City Hosp, Dept Urol, Shizuoka, Japan
[3] Shizuoka City Hosp, Dept Pathol, Shizuoka, Japan
[4] Kurashiki Cent Hosp, Dept Urol, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
[5] Kyoto Univ Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 606, Japan
来源
PROSTATE | 1998年 / 37卷 / 02期
关键词
mean nuclear volume; prostate cancer; Gleason score; prognostic index;
D O I
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(19981001)37:2<63::AID-PROS1>3.0.CO;2-M
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Various criteria for patients with prostate cancer have been reported to be of prognostic value, and we have reported that estimates of volume-weighted mean nuclear volume (MNV), developed by Gundersen and Jensen based on a stereological technique, accurately predict the prognosis of prostate cancer. However, all of these studies were con ducted on cases in a single institution, and it has remained unclear whether MNV calculations obtained at one institution apply to cases at another institution. Ln attempting to solve this problem, we made a prognostic index (P.I.) based on data from one hospital, and tested whether these data could be used to predict the prognosis of patients at another hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective, multivariate prognostic study of 195 patients with prostate cancer, diagnosed at Kyoto University Hospital and treated conservatively, indicated that clinical stage, Gleason score, and MNV were all significantly correlated with the prognosis of patients with prostate cancer. From the relative strengths of these prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis, the following P.I. was constructed: P.I. = Clinical stage x 1.8040 + Gleason score x 1.5245 + MNV x 2.3162 (the constants correspond to the risk ratio estimated by Cox analysis). The P.I. was calculated for 104 patients with prostate cancer diagnosed at Shizuoka City Hospital and treated conservatively for analysis of disease-specific survival. RESULTS. The prognostic index ranged from 3.841-16.142. Using the median value of 12.5 as a cutoff point, a clear separation of cases with poor and favorable prognosis was achieved (P < 0.0001, observation period: 1-167 months). CONCLUSIONS. The results of this study suggest that estimates of MNV can be evaluated at multiple institutions with the use of P.I. calculation. Furthermore, combining estimates of MNV with Gleason score and clinical stage predicts most powerfully disease outcome of patients with prostate cancer. (C) 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 69
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prognostic criteria in patients with prostate cancer: Gleason score versus volume-weighted mean nuclear volume
    Fujikawa, K
    Sasaki, M
    Arai, Y
    Yamabe, H
    Ogawa, O
    Yoshida, O
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 1997, 3 (04) : 613 - 618
  • [2] The role of volume-weighted mean nuclear volume in predicting disease outcome in patients with stage M1 prostate cancer
    Fujikawa, K
    Aoyama, T
    Itoh, T
    Nishio, Y
    Miyakawa, M
    Sasaki, M
    APMIS, 1999, 107 (04) : 395 - 400
  • [3] The role of volume-weighted mean nuclear volume in predicting disease outcome in patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy
    Fujikawa, K
    Itoh, T
    Nishi, Y
    Miyakawa, M
    Sasaki, M
    APMIS, 1999, 107 (08) : 773 - 778
  • [4] Intratumoral heterogeneity in prostate cancer demonstrated by volume-weighted mean nuclear volume
    Fujikawa, K
    Sasaki, M
    Aoyama, T
    Itoh, T
    Yoshida, O
    APMIS, 1997, 105 (04) : 322 - 328
  • [5] The role of volume-weighted mean nuclear volume in predicting tumour biology and clinical behaviour in patients with prostate cancer undergoing watchful waiting
    Arai, Y
    Egawa, S
    Kuwao, S
    Ogura, K
    Baba, S
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 88 (09) : 909 - 914
  • [6] Volume-weighted mean nuclear volume predicts tumor biology of clinically organ-confined prostate cancer
    Arai, Y
    Okubo, K
    Terada, N
    Matsuta, Y
    Egawa, S
    Kuwao, S
    Ogura, K
    PROSTATE, 2001, 46 (02): : 134 - 141
  • [7] Predicting pathological stage of localized prostate cancer using volume weighted mean nuclear volume
    Fujikawa, K
    Matsui, Y
    Kobayashi, T
    Miura, K
    Oka, H
    Fukuzawa, S
    Takeuchi, H
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (05): : 1587 - 1590
  • [8] Prognostic value of nuclear morphometry on needle biopsy from patients with prostate cancer: Is volume-weighted mean nuclear volume superior to other morphometric parameters?
    Zhang, YH
    Kanamaru, H
    Oyama, N
    Miwa, Y
    Suzuki, Y
    Akino, H
    Noriki, S
    Okada, K
    UROLOGY, 2000, 55 (03) : 377 - 381
  • [9] PROGNOSTIC CRITERIA IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE-CANCER - CORRELATION WITH VOLUME WEIGHTED MEAN NUCLEAR VOLUME
    FUJIKAWA, K
    SASAKI, M
    AOYAMA, T
    ITOH, T
    YOSHIDA, O
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (06): : 2123 - 2127
  • [10] Analytical comparison of volume-weighted mean nuclear volume between specimens from transrectal biopsy and transurethral resection of the prostate
    Fujikawa, K
    ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY, 1997, 19 (04): : 368 - 368