Self-efficacy instruments for type 2 diabetes self-care: A systematic review of measurement properties

被引:6
|
作者
Lee, Jiyeon [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Eun-Hyun [3 ]
Chae, Duckhee [4 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Nursing, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Mo Im Kim Nursing Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Ajou Univ, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Suwon, South Korea
[4] Chonnam Natl Univ, Coll Nursing, Gwangju, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
diabetes; instruments; nurse; nursing; psychometric properties; self-efficacy; systematic review; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; SCALE; MANAGEMENT; VALIDATION; CHINESE; VERSION; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1111/jan.14411
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims To identify currently available self-efficacy instruments for type 2 diabetes self-care and to evaluate the evidence for their measurement properties. Design Systematic review of measurement properties. Data sources The PubMed, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched from their inception to 27 May 2019. Review methods The updated COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments methodology were applied. Results Twelve instruments were identified from 3,665 records. Eight instruments were related to self-efficacy in performing a comprehensive set of the tasks/behaviours for diabetes self-care and the other four addressed specific behaviours related to diabetes self-care, such as insulin management. Most of the 12 instruments were developed based on Bandura's self-efficacy theory as their theoretical background. Overall, sufficient high-quality evidence for measurement properties was seldom identified. The Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale is currently the best instrument, with particularly the 4-factor, 16-item version being demonstrated to have sufficient high-quality evidence for structural and internal consistency and sufficient moderate-quality evidence for reliability and convergent validity. Conclusions None of the instruments evaluated all of the relevant measurement properties. The Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale is currently the most suitable instrument for potential use in practice and research. The measurement invariance across languages, measurement error and responsiveness of this instrument still need be evaluated. Impact This systematic review provides clinicians and researchers with a comprehensive list of available instruments for measuring self-efficacy in diabetes self-care, as well as evidence for helping them to select the most appropriate instrument. Using a psychometrically sound instrument will accurately inform practitioners about the levels of self-efficacy in self-care among patients with type 2 diabetes in practice and avoid threatening the credibility of research studies on self-efficacy in diabetes self-care.
引用
收藏
页码:2046 / 2059
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic review of the measurement properties of self-care scales in nurses
    Nahid Rajai
    Abbas Ebadi
    Leila Karimi
    Seyedeh Azam Sajadi
    Akram Parandeh
    [J]. BMC Nursing, 22
  • [32] Depression, distress and self-efficacy: The impact on diabetes self-care practices
    Devarajooh, Cassidy
    Chinna, Karuthan
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (03):
  • [33] Ethnic differences in illness perceptions, self-efficacy and diabetes self-care
    Bean, Debbie
    Cundy, Tim
    Petrie, Keith J.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2007, 22 (07) : 787 - 811
  • [34] Self-care, Self-efficacy, and Glycemic Control of Koreans With Diabetes Mellitus
    Lee, Haejung
    Ahn, Sukhee
    Kim, Yongsuk
    [J]. ASIAN NURSING RESEARCH, 2009, 3 (03) : 139 - 146
  • [35] ROLE OF SELF-EFFICACY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Chandar, Apoorva K.
    Falck-Ytter, Corinna
    Perzynski, Adam T.
    Gertz, Alida M.
    Windish, Donna
    Tyler, Carl V.
    Sage, Paulette A.
    Bolen, Shari
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 : S303 - S303
  • [36] Yes I can: The role of self-efficacy in diabetes self-care
    Recchia, S.
    Steffgen, G.
    Hoffmann, M.
    Spitz, E.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2010, 25 : 315 - 315
  • [37] Describing Self-Care Self-Efficacy: Definition, Measurement, Outcomes, and Implications
    Eller, Lucille S.
    Lev, Elise L.
    Yuan, Changrong
    Watkins, Ann Vreeland
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING KNOWLEDGE, 2018, 29 (01) : 38 - 48
  • [38] Self-Efficacy, Depression, and Self-Care Activities in Adult Jordanians with Type 2 Diabetes: The Role of Illness Perception
    Al-Amer, Rasmieh
    Ramjan, Lucie
    Glew, Paul
    Randall, Sue
    Salamonson, Yenna
    [J]. ISSUES IN MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2016, 37 (10) : 744 - 755
  • [39] Comparing self-efficacy and self-care behaviours between outpatients with comorbid schizophrenia and type 2 diabetes and outpatients with only type 2 diabetes
    Chen, S-R
    Chien, Y-P
    Kang, C-M
    Jeng, C.
    Chang, W-Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2014, 21 (05) : 414 - 422
  • [40] Self-efficacy measurement instruments for individuals with coronary artery disease: A systematic review
    de Almeida, Jose Alexandre Barbosa
    Florencio, Rencio Bento
    Leite, Jessica Costa
    Monteiro, Karolinne Souza
    Gualdi, Lucien Peroni
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (03):