National Analysis of Unplanned Readmissions After Thoracoscopic Versus Open Lung Cancer Resection

被引:24
|
作者
Bhagat, Rohun
Bronsert, Michael R.
Ward, Austin N.
Martin, Jeremiah
Juarez-Colunga, Elizabeth
Glebova, Natalia O.
Henderson, William G.
Fullerton, David
Weyant, Michael J.
Mitchell, John D.
Meguid, Robert A.
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Surg Outcomes & Appl Res Program SOAR, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Adult & Child Ctr Hlth Outcomes Res & Delivery Sc, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[5] Southern Ohio Med Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Portsmouth, OH USA
[6] Colorado Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat & Informat, Aurora, CO USA
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 2017年 / 104卷 / 06期
关键词
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS; LENGTH-OF-STAY; HOSPITAL READMISSION; PULMONARY LOBECTOMY; VASCULAR-SURGERY; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; RISK-FACTORS; THORACOTOMY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.08.047
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Hospital readmissions are viewed as a mark of inferior health care quality and are penalized. Unplanned postoperative readmission reason and timing after lung resection are not well understood. We examine related, unplanned readmissions after thoracoscopic versus open anatomic lung resections to identify opportunities to improve patient care. Methods. We analyzed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) data set, 2012 to 2015, characterizing 30-day related, unplanned postoperative readmissions after anatomic lung resections for primary lung cancer. Risk-adjusted comparison of readmission after thoracoscopic and open resection was performed using propensity matching. Results. Patients (n = 9,510) underwent anatomic lung resections; 4,935 (51.9%) were thoracoscopic resections and 4,575 (48.1%) were open resections. Of the thoracoscopic patients, 10.9% experienced one or more complications, versus 19.4% of patients with open resection (p < 0.0001). Of the thoracoscopic patients 5.5% experienced related, unplanned readmissions versus 7.2% of the patients with open resection (p < 0.001). 24.8% of complications after thoracoscopic approach occurred after discharge, versus 15.5% after open approach (p < 0.0001). Timing of unplanned readmission was similar for both groups. The propensity-matched odds ratio of risk of readmission after thoracoscopic versus open resection was 1.16 (95% confidence interval, 0.949 to 1.411, p = 0.15). Conclusions. Open anatomic lung resections for primary lung cancer had nearly twice the complication rate but only a slightly higher readmission rate than thoracoscopic resection. More complications occurred after discharge after thoracoscopic than open resections. Most readmissions occurred within 2 weeks after both thoracoscopic and open resections. Risk-adjusted comparison identified no statistically significant difference in risk of related, unplanned readmission after thoracoscopic versus open resections. Future studies should focus on identification of processes of care to decrease complications and unplanned readmissions after lung cancer resection. (C) 2017 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:1782 / 1790
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Thoracoscopic Versus Open Lobectomy After Induction Therapy for Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: New Study Results and Meta-analysis
    Hireche, Kheira
    Canaud, Ludovic
    Lounes, Youcef
    Aouinti, Safa
    Molinari, Nicolas
    Alric, Pierre
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 276 : 416 - 432
  • [32] Opioid Use After Open Resection or Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Early-Stage Lung Cancer
    Tuminello, Stephanie
    Schwartz, Rebecca M.
    Liu, Bian
    Mhango, Grace
    Wisnivesky, Juan
    Flores, Raja
    Taioli, Emanuela
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (11) : 1611 - 1613
  • [33] Unplanned Readmission After Lung Resection: Some Observations
    Garcia-Tirado, Javier
    Judez-Legaristi, Diego
    Maria Miguelena-Bobadilla, Jose
    Salvador Landa-Oviedo, Hugo
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 105 (01): : 338 - 338
  • [34] ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER AFTER THORACOSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN LOBECTOMY.
    Schytte, Tine
    Jakobsen, Erik
    Licht, Peter
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8 : S301 - S302
  • [35] Robotic Versus Thoracoscopic Resection for Lung Cancer: Early Results of a New Robotic Program
    Mungo, Benedetto
    Hooker, Craig M.
    Ho, Janelle S. Y.
    Yang, Stephen C.
    Battafarano, Richard J.
    Brock, Malcolm V.
    Molena, Daniela
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 26 (04): : 243 - 248
  • [36] A Pediatric NSQIP Analysis of Thoracoscopic and Open Approaches to Resection in Pediatric Congenital Lung Malformations
    Kulaylat, Afif N.
    Engbrecht, Brett W.
    Hollenbeak, Christopher S.
    Safford, Shawn D.
    Dillon, Peter W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2014, 219 (03) : S76 - S76
  • [37] Readmissions after lung resection in France: The PMSI database
    Moret, A.
    Madelaine, L.
    Cottenet, J.
    Mariet, A. Sophie
    Quantin, C.
    Bernard, A.
    Pages, P. B.
    REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES, 2021, 38 (07) : 673 - 680
  • [38] Survival After Sublobar Resection versus Lobectomy for Clinical Stage IA Lung Cancer An Analysis from the National Cancer Data Base
    Khullar, Onkar V.
    Liu, Yuan
    Gillespie, Theresa
    Higgins, Kristin A.
    Ramalingam, Suresh
    Lipscomb, Joseph
    Fernandez, Felix G.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10 (11) : 1625 - 1633
  • [39] Comparing Robotic, Thoracoscopic, and Open Segmentectomy: A National Cancer Database Analysis
    Caso, Raul
    Watson, Thomas J.
    Tefera, Eshetu
    Cerfolio, Robert
    Abbas, Abbas E.
    Lazar, John F.
    Margolis, Marc
    Hwalek, Ann E.
    Khaitan, Puja Gaur
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 296 : 674 - 680
  • [40] Comparison between open and thoracoscopic resection of congenital lung lesions
    Rahman, N.
    Lakhoo, Kokila
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2009, 44 (02) : 333 - 336