National Analysis of Unplanned Readmissions After Thoracoscopic Versus Open Lung Cancer Resection

被引:24
|
作者
Bhagat, Rohun
Bronsert, Michael R.
Ward, Austin N.
Martin, Jeremiah
Juarez-Colunga, Elizabeth
Glebova, Natalia O.
Henderson, William G.
Fullerton, David
Weyant, Michael J.
Mitchell, John D.
Meguid, Robert A.
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Surg Outcomes & Appl Res Program SOAR, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Adult & Child Ctr Hlth Outcomes Res & Delivery Sc, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[5] Southern Ohio Med Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Portsmouth, OH USA
[6] Colorado Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat & Informat, Aurora, CO USA
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 2017年 / 104卷 / 06期
关键词
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS; LENGTH-OF-STAY; HOSPITAL READMISSION; PULMONARY LOBECTOMY; VASCULAR-SURGERY; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; RISK-FACTORS; THORACOTOMY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.08.047
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Hospital readmissions are viewed as a mark of inferior health care quality and are penalized. Unplanned postoperative readmission reason and timing after lung resection are not well understood. We examine related, unplanned readmissions after thoracoscopic versus open anatomic lung resections to identify opportunities to improve patient care. Methods. We analyzed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) data set, 2012 to 2015, characterizing 30-day related, unplanned postoperative readmissions after anatomic lung resections for primary lung cancer. Risk-adjusted comparison of readmission after thoracoscopic and open resection was performed using propensity matching. Results. Patients (n = 9,510) underwent anatomic lung resections; 4,935 (51.9%) were thoracoscopic resections and 4,575 (48.1%) were open resections. Of the thoracoscopic patients, 10.9% experienced one or more complications, versus 19.4% of patients with open resection (p < 0.0001). Of the thoracoscopic patients 5.5% experienced related, unplanned readmissions versus 7.2% of the patients with open resection (p < 0.001). 24.8% of complications after thoracoscopic approach occurred after discharge, versus 15.5% after open approach (p < 0.0001). Timing of unplanned readmission was similar for both groups. The propensity-matched odds ratio of risk of readmission after thoracoscopic versus open resection was 1.16 (95% confidence interval, 0.949 to 1.411, p = 0.15). Conclusions. Open anatomic lung resections for primary lung cancer had nearly twice the complication rate but only a slightly higher readmission rate than thoracoscopic resection. More complications occurred after discharge after thoracoscopic than open resections. Most readmissions occurred within 2 weeks after both thoracoscopic and open resections. Risk-adjusted comparison identified no statistically significant difference in risk of related, unplanned readmission after thoracoscopic versus open resections. Future studies should focus on identification of processes of care to decrease complications and unplanned readmissions after lung cancer resection. (C) 2017 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:1782 / 1790
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Troubleshooting in thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection for lung cancer
    Atsushi Watanabe
    Surgery Today, 2021, 51 : 669 - 677
  • [22] Incidence of ipsilateral recurrence after open or thoracoscopic resection of colorectal lung metastases.
    Claramunt, Nuria Prenafeta
    Hwang, David
    Darling, Gail Elizabeth
    de Perrot, Marc
    Pierre, Andrew
    Yasufuku, Kazuhiro
    Keshavjee, Shaf
    Waddell, Thomas K.
    Cypel, Marcelo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [23] Early mortality after surgical resection for lung cancer: an analysis of the English National Lung cancer audit
    Powell, Helen A.
    Tata, Laila J.
    Baldwin, David R.
    Stanley, Rosamund A.
    Khakwani, Aamir
    Hubbard, Richard B.
    THORAX, 2013, 68 (09) : 826 - 834
  • [24] Survival After Sublobar Resection Versus Lobectomy for Clinical Stage IA Lung Cancer Analysis From the National Cancer Database
    Donington, Jessica S.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10 (11) : 1513 - 1514
  • [25] Robotic versus thoracoscopic lung resection A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Emmert, Alexander
    Straube, Carmen
    Buentzel, Judith
    Roever, Christian
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (35)
  • [26] Lobectomy Versus Sublobar Resection in Simultaneous Bilateral Thoracoscopic Lung Resection
    Liu, Yu-Wei
    Wu, Ming-Ho
    Kao, Chieh-Ni
    Chiang, Hung-Hsing
    Lee, Jui-Ying
    Li, Hsien-Pin
    Chang, Po-Chih
    Chou, Andre
    Chou, Shah-Hwa
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 47 (10) : 2568 - 2577
  • [27] Lobectomy Versus Sublobar Resection in Simultaneous Bilateral Thoracoscopic Lung Resection
    Yu-Wei Liu
    Ming-Ho Wu
    Chieh-Ni Kao
    Hung-Hsing Chiang
    Jui-Ying Lee
    Hsien-Pin Li
    Po-Chih Chang
    Andre Chou
    Shah-Hwa Chou
    World Journal of Surgery, 2023, 47 : 2568 - 2577
  • [28] Postoperative Complications Drive Unplanned Readmissions After Esophagectomy for Cancer
    Bhagat, Rohun
    Bronsert, Michael R.
    Juarez-Colunga, Elizabeth
    Weyant, Michael J.
    Mitchell, John D.
    Glebova, Natalia O.
    Henderson, William G.
    Fullerton, David
    Meguid, Robert A.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 105 (05): : 1476 - 1482
  • [29] ECONOMIC BURDEN OF PROLONGED AIR LEAK AFTER LUNG RESECTION: OPEN VERSUS VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY (VATS)
    Swanson, S.
    Miller, D.
    McKenna, R.
    Meyers, B.
    Marshall, M. B.
    Ghosh, S. K.
    Fegelman, E.
    Roy, S.
    Ryan, M.
    Gunnarsson, C.
    Howington, J. A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A80 - A80
  • [30] Open versus thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of lung cancer: Intraoperative decision making
    Liu, H
    Lu, M
    Hsieh, M
    Liu, Y
    Wu, Y
    LUNG CANCER, 2005, 49 : S355 - S355