Development of Australian clinical practice outcome standards for graduates of critical care nurse education

被引:21
|
作者
Gill, Fenella J. [1 ,2 ]
Leslie, Gavin D. [3 ,4 ]
Grech, Carol [5 ]
Boldy, Duncan [1 ]
Latour, Jos M. [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Fac Hlth Sci, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[2] Princess Margaret Hosp Children, Child & Adolescent Hlth Serv, Subiaco, WA, Australia
[3] Curtin Univ, Joint Appointment Royal Perth Hosp, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Curtin Hlth Innovat Res Inst, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[4] Curtin Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Curtin Hlth Innovat Res Inst, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[5] Univ S Australia, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[6] Univ Plymouth, Fac Hlth Educ & Soc, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
[7] Erasmus MC Sophia Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Intens Care Neonatol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
assessment; Delphi study; graduate-level education; intensive care; nursing; nursing education research; postregistration qualifications; BASIC COMPETENCE; DELPHI; TOOL;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.12631
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and objectives. To develop critical care nurse education practice standards. Background. Critical care specialist education for registered nurses in Australia is provided at graduate level. Considerable variation exists across courses with no framework to guide practice outcomes or evidence supporting the level of qualification. Design. An eDelphi technique involved the iterative process of a national expert panel responding to three survey rounds. Methods. For the first round, 84 statements, organised within six domains, were developed from earlier phases of the study that included a literature review, analysis of critical care courses and input from health consumers. The panel, which represented the perspectives of four stakeholder groups, responded to two rating scales: level of importance and level of practice. Results. Of 105 experts who agreed to participate, 92 (88%) completed survey round I; 85 (92%) round II; and 73 (86%) round III. Of the 98 statements, 75 were rated as having a high level of importance - median 7 (IQR 6-7); 14 were rated as having a moderate level of importance - median 6 (IQR 5-7); and nine were rated as having a low level of importance - median 4 (IQR 4-6)-6 (IQR 4-6). The majority of the panel rated graduate level of practice as 'demonstrates independently' or 'teaches or supervises others' for 80 statements. For 18 statements, there was no category selected by 50% or more of the panel. The process resulted in the development of 98 practice standards, categorised into three levels, indicating a practice outcome level by the practitioner who can independently provide nursing care for a variety of critically ill patients in most contexts, using a patient-and family-focused approach. Conclusion/relevance to clinical practice. The graduate practice outcomes provide a critical care qualification definition for nursing workforce standards and can be used by course providers to achieve consistent practice outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 499
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Caring Continuum Role of the Pediatric Critical Care Advanced Practice Nurse in Palliative Care Program Development
    Mauricio, Riza V.
    Okhuysen-Cawley, Regina
    CRITICAL CARE NURSING QUARTERLY, 2010, 33 (03) : 292 - 297
  • [32] The intuitive nurse in critical care practice: a phenomenological study
    Hassani, Parkhide
    Abdi, Alireza
    Jalali, Rostam
    Salari, Nader
    NURSING REPORTS, 2016, 6 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [33] Development of a nurse-sensitive education outcome indicator: New ostomate self-care education
    Demmer, KA
    Nelson, KE
    JOURNAL OF WOUND OSTOMY AND CONTINENCE NURSING, 2006, 33 (03) : S36 - S36
  • [34] Nurse led care coordination: Trial protocol and development of a best practice resource guide for a cluster controlled clinical trial in Australian aged care facilities
    Arendts, Glenn
    Etherton-Beer, Christopher
    Howard, Kirsten
    Lewin, Gill
    Sim, Moira
    Pickstock, Sarah
    Fitzhardinge, Sarah
    O'Brien, Keith
    Tassell, Shannon
    Deans, Pamela
    Blackwell, Scott
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2014, 58 (01) : 15 - 19
  • [35] The Certified Clinical Nurse Leader in Critical Care
    L'Ecuyer, Kristine M.
    Shatto, Bobbi J.
    Hoffmann, Rosemary L.
    Crecelius, Matthew L.
    DIMENSIONS OF CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2016, 35 (05) : 248 - 254
  • [36] The development of practice standards for patient education in nurse-led clinics: a mixed-method study
    Zohre Pouresmail
    Fatemeh Heshmati Nabavi
    Maryam Rassouli
    BMC Nursing, 22
  • [37] The development of practice standards for patient education in nurse-led clinics: a mixed-method study
    Pouresmail, Zohre
    Nabavi, Fatemeh Heshmati
    Rassouli, Maryam
    BMC NURSING, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [38] Gamification in Critical Care Education and Practice
    Bass, Gary Alan
    Chang, Cherylee W. J.
    Sorce, Lauren R.
    Subramanian, Sanjay
    Laytin, Adam D.
    Somodi, Reka
    Gray, Jaime R.
    Lane-Fall, Meghan
    Kaplan, Lewis J.
    CRITICAL CARE EXPLORATIONS, 2024, 6 (01) : E1034
  • [39] CRITICAL CARE NURSE PRACTITIONER - EDUCATION, EXPECTATION, AND IMPLEMENTATION
    BREDENBERG, P
    HEART & LUNG, 1979, 8 (05): : 939 - 943
  • [40] DELIVERING CRITICAL CARE NURSE EDUCATION ACROSS THE PENNINES
    Beavors, Sophie
    Cook, Samantha
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 27 : 29 - 30