Development of Australian clinical practice outcome standards for graduates of critical care nurse education

被引:21
|
作者
Gill, Fenella J. [1 ,2 ]
Leslie, Gavin D. [3 ,4 ]
Grech, Carol [5 ]
Boldy, Duncan [1 ]
Latour, Jos M. [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Fac Hlth Sci, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[2] Princess Margaret Hosp Children, Child & Adolescent Hlth Serv, Subiaco, WA, Australia
[3] Curtin Univ, Joint Appointment Royal Perth Hosp, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Curtin Hlth Innovat Res Inst, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[4] Curtin Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Curtin Hlth Innovat Res Inst, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[5] Univ S Australia, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[6] Univ Plymouth, Fac Hlth Educ & Soc, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
[7] Erasmus MC Sophia Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Intens Care Neonatol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
assessment; Delphi study; graduate-level education; intensive care; nursing; nursing education research; postregistration qualifications; BASIC COMPETENCE; DELPHI; TOOL;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.12631
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and objectives. To develop critical care nurse education practice standards. Background. Critical care specialist education for registered nurses in Australia is provided at graduate level. Considerable variation exists across courses with no framework to guide practice outcomes or evidence supporting the level of qualification. Design. An eDelphi technique involved the iterative process of a national expert panel responding to three survey rounds. Methods. For the first round, 84 statements, organised within six domains, were developed from earlier phases of the study that included a literature review, analysis of critical care courses and input from health consumers. The panel, which represented the perspectives of four stakeholder groups, responded to two rating scales: level of importance and level of practice. Results. Of 105 experts who agreed to participate, 92 (88%) completed survey round I; 85 (92%) round II; and 73 (86%) round III. Of the 98 statements, 75 were rated as having a high level of importance - median 7 (IQR 6-7); 14 were rated as having a moderate level of importance - median 6 (IQR 5-7); and nine were rated as having a low level of importance - median 4 (IQR 4-6)-6 (IQR 4-6). The majority of the panel rated graduate level of practice as 'demonstrates independently' or 'teaches or supervises others' for 80 statements. For 18 statements, there was no category selected by 50% or more of the panel. The process resulted in the development of 98 practice standards, categorised into three levels, indicating a practice outcome level by the practitioner who can independently provide nursing care for a variety of critically ill patients in most contexts, using a patient-and family-focused approach. Conclusion/relevance to clinical practice. The graduate practice outcomes provide a critical care qualification definition for nursing workforce standards and can be used by course providers to achieve consistent practice outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 499
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The development of professional practice standards for Australian general practice nurses
    Halcomb, Elizabeth
    Stephens, Moira
    Bryce, Julianne
    Foley, Elizabeth
    Ashley, Christine
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2017, 73 (08) : 1958 - 1969
  • [22] Education standards, accreditation, certification, and regulation of nurse practitioner practice
    Savin, Michele K.
    Newberry, Desi M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2023, 35 (11) : 725 - 730
  • [23] A Faculty Practice Plan for the Acute Care and Critical Care Nurse
    Nardi, Deena
    Wilson, Carol
    AACN ADVANCED CRITICAL CARE, 2008, 19 (01) : 78 - 84
  • [24] Clinical Nurse Leader Practice Development
    Salinas, Brianna
    Leger, J. Michael
    JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2024, 39 (04) : 354 - 360
  • [25] Adoption of new practice standards in nursing: Revalidation of a tool to measure performance using the Australian registered nurse standards for practice
    Ossenberg, Christine
    Mitchell, Marion
    Henderson, Amanda
    COLLEGIAN, 2020, 27 (04) : 352 - 360
  • [26] Standards of care in practice: The nurse's role in effecting change
    Nugent, Elinor
    NEPHROLOGY NURSING JOURNAL, 2006, 33 (05) : 573 - 574
  • [27] Expanding Acute Care Nurse Practitioner and Clinical Nurse Specialist Education Invasive Procedure Training and Human Simulation in Critical Care
    Hravnak, Marilyn
    Tuite, Patricia
    Baldisseri, Marie
    AACN ADVANCED CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 16 (01) : 89 - 104
  • [28] Standards for Education and Credentialing in Critical Care Medicine
    Kaplan, Lewis J.
    Shaw, Andrew D.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 305 (03): : 296 - 297
  • [29] Critical care nurse practitioners improve compliance with clinical practice guidelines in the surgical intensive care unit
    Gracias, VH
    Sicoutris, CP
    Meredith, DM
    Haut, E
    Auerbach, S
    Sonnad, S
    Rich, V
    Reilly, P
    Hanson, CW
    Schwab, CW
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (12) : A93 - A93
  • [30] Development of nurse practitioner metaspecialty clinical practice standards: A national sequential mixed methods study
    Gardner, Anne
    Helms, Christopher
    Gardner, Glenn
    Coyer, Fiona
    Gosby, Helen
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2021, 77 (03) : 1453 - 1464