Development of Australian clinical practice outcome standards for graduates of critical care nurse education

被引:21
|
作者
Gill, Fenella J. [1 ,2 ]
Leslie, Gavin D. [3 ,4 ]
Grech, Carol [5 ]
Boldy, Duncan [1 ]
Latour, Jos M. [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Fac Hlth Sci, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[2] Princess Margaret Hosp Children, Child & Adolescent Hlth Serv, Subiaco, WA, Australia
[3] Curtin Univ, Joint Appointment Royal Perth Hosp, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Curtin Hlth Innovat Res Inst, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[4] Curtin Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Curtin Hlth Innovat Res Inst, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[5] Univ S Australia, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[6] Univ Plymouth, Fac Hlth Educ & Soc, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
[7] Erasmus MC Sophia Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Intens Care Neonatol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
assessment; Delphi study; graduate-level education; intensive care; nursing; nursing education research; postregistration qualifications; BASIC COMPETENCE; DELPHI; TOOL;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.12631
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and objectives. To develop critical care nurse education practice standards. Background. Critical care specialist education for registered nurses in Australia is provided at graduate level. Considerable variation exists across courses with no framework to guide practice outcomes or evidence supporting the level of qualification. Design. An eDelphi technique involved the iterative process of a national expert panel responding to three survey rounds. Methods. For the first round, 84 statements, organised within six domains, were developed from earlier phases of the study that included a literature review, analysis of critical care courses and input from health consumers. The panel, which represented the perspectives of four stakeholder groups, responded to two rating scales: level of importance and level of practice. Results. Of 105 experts who agreed to participate, 92 (88%) completed survey round I; 85 (92%) round II; and 73 (86%) round III. Of the 98 statements, 75 were rated as having a high level of importance - median 7 (IQR 6-7); 14 were rated as having a moderate level of importance - median 6 (IQR 5-7); and nine were rated as having a low level of importance - median 4 (IQR 4-6)-6 (IQR 4-6). The majority of the panel rated graduate level of practice as 'demonstrates independently' or 'teaches or supervises others' for 80 statements. For 18 statements, there was no category selected by 50% or more of the panel. The process resulted in the development of 98 practice standards, categorised into three levels, indicating a practice outcome level by the practitioner who can independently provide nursing care for a variety of critically ill patients in most contexts, using a patient-and family-focused approach. Conclusion/relevance to clinical practice. The graduate practice outcomes provide a critical care qualification definition for nursing workforce standards and can be used by course providers to achieve consistent practice outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 499
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of Australian clinical practice outcome standards for graduates of critical care nurse education
    Gill, F.
    Leslie, G.
    Grech, G.
    Boldy, D.
    Latour, J.
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 27 (01) : 44 - 44
  • [2] Practice expectations for graduates of Australian critical care nurse education: Development of the standard of practice and evaluation of critical-care-nursing tool (SPECT)
    Gill, F.
    Leslie, G.
    Grech, C.
    Latour, J.
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2015, 28 (01) : 37 - 37
  • [3] Development of a position statement for Australian critical care nurse education
    Gill, Fenella J.
    Lin, Frances
    Massey, Deborah
    Wilson, Lorraine
    Greenwood, Melanie
    Skylas, Katina
    Woodard, Mark
    Tembo, Agness
    Mitchell, Marion
    Gullick, Janice
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 32 (04) : 346 - 350
  • [4] Clinical Research Nurse Education Using scope and standards of practice to improve care
    Herena, Pamela S.
    Paguio, Glenna
    Pulone, Bernadette
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2018, 22 (04) : 450 - 452
  • [5] An analysis of Australian graduate critical care nurse education
    Gill, Fenella J.
    Leslie, Gavin D.
    Grech, Carol
    Latour, Jos M.
    COLLEGIAN, 2015, 22 (01) : 71 - 81
  • [6] Developing and testing the standard of practice and evaluation of critical-care-nursing tool (SPECT) for graduates of critical care nurse education programs
    Gill, F.
    Leslie, G.
    Grech, C.
    Boldy, D.
    Latour, J.
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2015, 28 (01) : 47 - 47
  • [7] IMPLEMENTATION AND UTILISATION OF AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE PRACTICE STANDARDS: HOW CRITICAL CARE NURSES USE THEM TO DEVELOP THEIR PRACTICE
    Cox, Yolanda
    Massey, Deb
    Bilszta, Justin
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 35 : S6 - S6
  • [8] A review of critical care nursing staffing, education and practice standards
    Gill, Fenella J.
    Leslie, Gavin D.
    Grech, Carol
    Latour, Jos M.
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 25 (04) : 224 - 237
  • [9] New nurse graduates and rapidly changing clinical situations: the role of expert critical care nurse mentors
    Kennedy, Julie
    Astroth, Kim M.
    Woith, Wendy M.
    Novotny, Nancy L.
    Jenkins, Sheryl H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION SCHOLARSHIP, 2021, 18 (01):
  • [10] Competency Development in New Registered Nurse Graduates: Closing the Gap Between Education and Practice
    Burns, Paulette
    Poster, Elizabeth C.
    JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN NURSING, 2008, 39 (02): : 67 - 73