A robust spatial autoregressive scalar-on-function regression with t-distribution

被引:5
|
作者
Huang, Tingting [1 ,2 ]
Saporta, Gilbert [3 ]
Wang, Huiwen [1 ,4 ]
Wang, Shanshan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Xueyuan Rd 37, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Key Lab Emergence Support Simulat Technol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] CEDRIC CNAM, 292 Rue St Martin, F-75141 Paris 03, France
[4] Beihang Univ, Beijing Adv Innovat Ctr Big Data & Brain Comp, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
EM algorithm; FPCA; Functional linear model; Spatial autoregressive model; Spatial dependence; t-distribution; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; CONVERGENCE-RATES; MODELS; ESTIMATORS; METHODOLOGY; SPILLOVERS;
D O I
10.1007/s11634-020-00384-w
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Modelling functional data in the presence of spatial dependence is of great practical importance as exemplified by applications in the fields of demography, economy and geography, and has received much attention recently. However, for the classical scalar-on-function regression (SoFR) with functional covariates and scalar responses, only a relatively few literature is dedicated to this relevant area, which merits further research. We propose a robust spatial autoregressive scalar-on-function regression by incorporating a spatial autoregressive parameter and a spatial weight matrix into the SoFR to accommodate spatial dependencies among individuals. The t-distribution assumption for the error terms makes our model more robust than the classical spatial autoregressive models under normal distributions. We estimate the model by firstly projecting the functional predictor onto a functional space spanned by an orthonormal functional basis and then presenting an expectation-maximization algorithm. Simulation studies show that our estimators are efficient, and are superior in the scenario with spatial correlation and heavy tailed error terms. A real weather dataset demonstrates the superiority of our model to the SoFR in the case of spatial dependence.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 81
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A robust spatial autoregressive scalar-on-function regression with t-distribution
    Tingting Huang
    Gilbert Saporta
    Huiwen Wang
    Shanshan Wang
    Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 2021, 15 : 57 - 81
  • [2] Robust scalar-on-function partial quantile regression
    Beyaztas, Ufuk
    Tez, Mujgan
    Lin Shang, Han
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2024, 51 (07) : 1359 - 1377
  • [3] A robust scalar-on-function logistic regression for classification
    Mutis, Muge
    Beyaztas, Ufuk
    Simsek, Gulhayat Golbasi
    Shang, Han Lin
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2023, 52 (23) : 8538 - 8554
  • [4] Methods for Scalar-on-Function Regression
    Reiss, Philip T.
    Goldsmith, Jeff
    Shang, Han Lin
    Ogden, R. Todd
    INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW, 2017, 85 (02) : 228 - 249
  • [5] Robust mixture regression using the t-distribution
    Yao, Weixin
    Wei, Yan
    Yu, Chun
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2014, 71 : 116 - 127
  • [6] Locally sparse and robust partial least squares in scalar-on-function regression
    Gurer, Sude
    Shang, Han Lin
    Mandal, Abhijit
    Beyaztas, Ufuk
    STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2024, 34 (05)
  • [7] A comparison of testing methods in scalar-on-function regression
    Tekbudak, Merve Yasemin
    Alfaro-Cordoba, Marcela
    Maity, Arnab
    Staicu, Ana-Maria
    ASTA-ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 103 (03) : 411 - 436
  • [8] Scalar-on-function local linear regression and beyond
    Ferraty, F.
    Nagy, S.
    BIOMETRIKA, 2022, 109 (02) : 439 - 455
  • [9] Estimator selection and combination in scalar-on-function regression
    Goldsmith, Jeff
    Scheipl, Fabian
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2014, 70 : 362 - 372
  • [10] A comparison of testing methods in scalar-on-function regression
    Merve Yasemin Tekbudak
    Marcela Alfaro-Córdoba
    Arnab Maity
    Ana-Maria Staicu
    AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, 2019, 103 : 411 - 436