Comparison of four nutritional screening tools to detect nutritional risk in hospitalized patients: a multicentre study

被引:142
|
作者
Velasco, C. [1 ]
Garcia, E. [2 ]
Rodriguez, V. [3 ]
Frias, L. [1 ]
Garriga, R. [3 ]
Alvarez, J. [3 ]
Garcia-Peris, P. [1 ]
Leon, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Univ Gregorio Maranon, Unidad Nutr, Madrid 28007, Spain
[2] HGU Doce Octubre, Nutr Unit, Madrid, Spain
[3] HGU Principe Asturias, Endocrinol & Nutr Dept, Alcala De Henares, Spain
关键词
nutritional screening tools; nutritional risk; hospital admission; SUBJECTIVE GLOBAL ASSESSMENT; MALNOURISHED PATIENTS; SURGICAL-PATIENTS; MALNUTRITION; PREVALENCE; ADMISSION; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1038/ejcn.2010.243
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: The prevalence of malnutrition in hospitals is high. No nutritional screening tool is considered the gold standard for identifying nutritional risk. The aims of this study were to evaluate nutritional risk in hospitalized patients using four nutritional screening tools. Subjects/Methods: Four nutritional screening tools were evaluated: nutritional risk screening (NRS-2002), the malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST), the subjective global assessment (SGA) and the mini nutritional assessment (MNA). Patients were assessed within the first 36 h after hospital admission. Date of admission, diagnosis, complications and date of discharge were collected. To compare the tools, the results were reorganized into: patients at risk and patients with a good nutritional status. The statistical analysis included the chi(2)-test to assess differences between the tests and the kappa statistic to assess agreement between the tests. Results: The study sample comprised 400 patients (159 women, 241 men), mean age 67.3 (16.1) years. The prevalence of patients at nutritional risk with the NRS-2002, MUST, SGA and MNA was 34.5, 31.5, 35.3 and 58.5%, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed between the four nutritional screening tools (P<0.001). The agreement between the tools was quite good except for the MNA (MNA-SGA kappa = 0.491, NRS-2002-SGA kappa = 0.620 and MUST-SGA kappa = 0.635). Patients at nutritional risk developed more complications during admission and had an increased length of stay. Conclusions: The prevalence of nutritional risk in hospitalized patients was high with all the tools used. The best agreement between the tools was for NRS-2002 with SGA and MUST with SGA. At admission, NRS-2002 and MUST should be used to screen for nutritional status. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2011) 65, 269-274; doi:10.1038/ejcn.2010.243; published online 17 November 2010
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 274
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of NRS-2002 criteria with nutritional risk in hospitalized patients
    de Oliveira Barbosa, Adriana Aparecida
    Vicentini, Andrea Pereira
    Langa, Fernanda Ramos
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2019, 24 (09): : 3325 - 3334
  • [42] Comparison of tools for nutritional assessment and screening at hospital admission: A population study
    Kyle, Ursula G.
    Kossovsky, Michel P.
    Karsegard, Veronique L.
    Pichard, Claude
    CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2006, 25 (03) : 409 - 417
  • [43] Comparison of specificity and sensitivity among Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and Graz Malnutrition Screening methods in hospitalized cancer patients
    Santos, Silva Leidiane
    Custodio dos Santos, Ellen Maria
    Melo, Nathalia Caroline de Oliveira
    Silva, Laura Mata de Lima
    Leao da Costa, Isabela Catarina
    Maio, Regiane
    NUTRICION CLINICA Y DIETETICA HOSPITALARIA, 2019, 39 (02): : 85 - 90
  • [44] Nutritional risk in hospitalized patients: impact of nutritional status on serum prealbumin
    Saka, Bulent
    Ozturk, Gulistan Bahat
    Uzun, Sami
    Erten, Nilgun
    Genc, Sema
    Karan, Mehmet Akif
    Tascioglu, Cemil
    Kaysi, Abdulkadir
    REVISTA DE NUTRICAO-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2011, 24 (01): : 89 - 98
  • [45] Nutritional screening in hospitalized patients with vascular disease - The relationship of nutritional risk with clinical and economic outcomes in a surgery department
    Novo Martinez, Gloria Maria
    Ballesteros Pomar, Maria D.
    Sierra Vega, Matilde
    Garcia Gallego, Ana Belen
    NUTRICION HOSPITALARIA, 2021, 38 (03) : 525 - 532
  • [46] Variation in the prevalence of nutritional risk in hospitalized individuals according to five nutritional screening protocols
    Duarte, Juliane Pereira
    Paludo, Juliana
    Nunes Lemos, Joana Raquel
    Moreira, Thais Rodrigues
    SCIENTIA MEDICA, 2014, 24 (01) : 26 - 32
  • [47] Nutritional screening and risk factors in elderly hospitalized patients: association to clinical outcome?
    Holst, Mette
    Yifter-Lindgren, Elinor
    Surowiak, Mirek
    Nielsen, Kari
    Mowe, Morten
    Carlsson, Maine
    Jacobsen, Bent
    Cederholm, Tommy
    Fenger-Groen, Morten
    Rasmussen, Henrik
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2013, 27 (04) : 953 - 961
  • [48] Screening of nutritional risk: assessment of predictive variables of nutritional risk in hospitalized patients in a second-level care center in Mexico
    Luis Gutierrez-de-Santiago, Jorge
    Aguilar-Valdez, Sandra
    Leticia Casas-Robles, Myrella
    Garza-Veloz, Idalia
    Ortega-Cisneros, Vicente
    Martinez-Fierro, Margarita L.
    NUTRICION HOSPITALARIA, 2019, 36 (03) : 626 - 632
  • [49] A multicentre study to implement nutritional risk screening and evaluate clinical outcome and quality of life in patients with cancer
    Yu, K.
    Zhou, X-R
    He, S-L
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2013, 67 (07) : 732 - 737
  • [50] A multicentre study to implement nutritional risk screening and evaluate clinical outcome and quality of life in patients with cancer
    K Yu
    X-r Zhou
    S-l He
    European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2013, 67 : 732 - 737