Comparison of four nutritional screening tools to detect nutritional risk in hospitalized patients: a multicentre study

被引:141
|
作者
Velasco, C. [1 ]
Garcia, E. [2 ]
Rodriguez, V. [3 ]
Frias, L. [1 ]
Garriga, R. [3 ]
Alvarez, J. [3 ]
Garcia-Peris, P. [1 ]
Leon, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Univ Gregorio Maranon, Unidad Nutr, Madrid 28007, Spain
[2] HGU Doce Octubre, Nutr Unit, Madrid, Spain
[3] HGU Principe Asturias, Endocrinol & Nutr Dept, Alcala De Henares, Spain
关键词
nutritional screening tools; nutritional risk; hospital admission; SUBJECTIVE GLOBAL ASSESSMENT; MALNOURISHED PATIENTS; SURGICAL-PATIENTS; MALNUTRITION; PREVALENCE; ADMISSION; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1038/ejcn.2010.243
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: The prevalence of malnutrition in hospitals is high. No nutritional screening tool is considered the gold standard for identifying nutritional risk. The aims of this study were to evaluate nutritional risk in hospitalized patients using four nutritional screening tools. Subjects/Methods: Four nutritional screening tools were evaluated: nutritional risk screening (NRS-2002), the malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST), the subjective global assessment (SGA) and the mini nutritional assessment (MNA). Patients were assessed within the first 36 h after hospital admission. Date of admission, diagnosis, complications and date of discharge were collected. To compare the tools, the results were reorganized into: patients at risk and patients with a good nutritional status. The statistical analysis included the chi(2)-test to assess differences between the tests and the kappa statistic to assess agreement between the tests. Results: The study sample comprised 400 patients (159 women, 241 men), mean age 67.3 (16.1) years. The prevalence of patients at nutritional risk with the NRS-2002, MUST, SGA and MNA was 34.5, 31.5, 35.3 and 58.5%, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed between the four nutritional screening tools (P<0.001). The agreement between the tools was quite good except for the MNA (MNA-SGA kappa = 0.491, NRS-2002-SGA kappa = 0.620 and MUST-SGA kappa = 0.635). Patients at nutritional risk developed more complications during admission and had an increased length of stay. Conclusions: The prevalence of nutritional risk in hospitalized patients was high with all the tools used. The best agreement between the tools was for NRS-2002 with SGA and MUST with SGA. At admission, NRS-2002 and MUST should be used to screen for nutritional status. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2011) 65, 269-274; doi:10.1038/ejcn.2010.243; published online 17 November 2010
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 274
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of nutritional risk screening in hospitalized patients on management, outcome and costs: A retrospective study
    Khalatbari-Soltani, Saman
    Marques-Vidal, Pedro
    [J]. CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2016, 35 (06) : 1340 - 1346
  • [32] Identification of hospitalized patients with nutritional risk at admission assessed with the Nutrition Risk Screening
    Robleda-Font, Gemma
    Victoria-Moix-Gomez, Mariona
    Serrano-Herrera, Cristina
    Navarro-Cano, Gemma
    [J]. ENFERMERIA CLINICA, 2023, 33 (03): : 175 - 183
  • [33] Nutritional risk of hospitalized patients in Turkey
    Korfali, Guelsen
    Gundogdu, Haldun
    Aydintug, Semih
    Bahar, Mois
    Besler, Tanju
    Moral, Ali Resat
    Oguz, Mehmet
    Sakarya, Melek
    Uyar, Mehmet
    Kilicturgay, Sadik
    [J]. CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2009, 28 (05) : 533 - 537
  • [34] Comparison of Three Nutritional Screening Tools with the New Glim Criteria for Malnutrition and Association with Sarcopenia in Hospitalized Older Patients
    Bellanti, Francesco
    Lo Buglio, Aurelio
    Quiete, Stefano
    Pellegrino, Giuseppe
    Dobrakowski, Michal
    Kasperczyk, Aleksandra
    Kasperczyk, Slawomir
    Vendemiale, Gianluigi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (06) : 1 - 12
  • [35] Applicability of nutritional screening methods in hospitalized patients
    Raslan, Mariana
    Gonzalez, Maria Cristina
    Goncalves Dias, Maria Carolina
    Paes-Barbosa, Fabio Colagrossi
    Cecconello, Ivan
    Waitzberg, Dan Linetzky
    [J]. REVISTA DE NUTRICAO-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2008, 21 (05): : 553 - 561
  • [36] Nutritional Risk Screening Tools in Hospitalised Children
    Moeeni, Vesal
    Day, Andrew S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHILD HEALTH AND NUTRITION, 2012, 1 (01): : 39 - 43
  • [37] Comparison of Nutritional Screening Tools in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Gastric Cancer
    Yildirim, Reyyan
    Candas, Bahar
    Usta, M. Arif
    Erkul, Oguz
    Turkyilmaz, Serdar
    Guner, Ali
    [J]. HASEKI TIP BULTENI-MEDICAL BULLETIN OF HASEKI, 2020, 58 (02): : 153 - 161
  • [38] Comparison of nutritional risk screening with NRS2002 and the GLIM diagnostic criteria for malnutrition in hospitalized patients
    Marte A. Trollebø
    Eli Skeie
    Ingrid Revheim
    Helene Stangeland
    Mari-Anne H. Erstein
    Martin K. Grønning
    Randi J. Tangvik
    Mette H. Morken
    Ottar Nygård
    Tomas M. L. Eagan
    Hanne Rosendahl-Riise
    Jutta Dierkes
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 12
  • [39] Comparison of nutritional risk screening with NRS2002 and the GLIM diagnostic criteria for malnutrition in hospitalized patients
    Trollebo, Marte A.
    Skeie, Eli
    Revheim, Ingrid
    Stangeland, Helene
    Erstein, Mari-Anne H.
    Gronning, Martin K.
    Tangvik, Randi J.
    Morken, Mette H.
    Nygard, Ottar
    Eagan, Tomas M. L.
    Rosendahl-Riise, Hanne
    Dierkes, Jutta
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [40] Screening for nutritional risk in hospitalized children with liver disease
    Song, Tiantian
    Mu, Ying
    Gong, Xue
    Ma, Wenyan
    Li, Li
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2017, 26 (06) : 1107 - 1112