Comparison of four nutritional screening tools to detect nutritional risk in hospitalized patients: a multicentre study

被引:141
|
作者
Velasco, C. [1 ]
Garcia, E. [2 ]
Rodriguez, V. [3 ]
Frias, L. [1 ]
Garriga, R. [3 ]
Alvarez, J. [3 ]
Garcia-Peris, P. [1 ]
Leon, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Univ Gregorio Maranon, Unidad Nutr, Madrid 28007, Spain
[2] HGU Doce Octubre, Nutr Unit, Madrid, Spain
[3] HGU Principe Asturias, Endocrinol & Nutr Dept, Alcala De Henares, Spain
关键词
nutritional screening tools; nutritional risk; hospital admission; SUBJECTIVE GLOBAL ASSESSMENT; MALNOURISHED PATIENTS; SURGICAL-PATIENTS; MALNUTRITION; PREVALENCE; ADMISSION; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1038/ejcn.2010.243
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: The prevalence of malnutrition in hospitals is high. No nutritional screening tool is considered the gold standard for identifying nutritional risk. The aims of this study were to evaluate nutritional risk in hospitalized patients using four nutritional screening tools. Subjects/Methods: Four nutritional screening tools were evaluated: nutritional risk screening (NRS-2002), the malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST), the subjective global assessment (SGA) and the mini nutritional assessment (MNA). Patients were assessed within the first 36 h after hospital admission. Date of admission, diagnosis, complications and date of discharge were collected. To compare the tools, the results were reorganized into: patients at risk and patients with a good nutritional status. The statistical analysis included the chi(2)-test to assess differences between the tests and the kappa statistic to assess agreement between the tests. Results: The study sample comprised 400 patients (159 women, 241 men), mean age 67.3 (16.1) years. The prevalence of patients at nutritional risk with the NRS-2002, MUST, SGA and MNA was 34.5, 31.5, 35.3 and 58.5%, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed between the four nutritional screening tools (P<0.001). The agreement between the tools was quite good except for the MNA (MNA-SGA kappa = 0.491, NRS-2002-SGA kappa = 0.620 and MUST-SGA kappa = 0.635). Patients at nutritional risk developed more complications during admission and had an increased length of stay. Conclusions: The prevalence of nutritional risk in hospitalized patients was high with all the tools used. The best agreement between the tools was for NRS-2002 with SGA and MUST with SGA. At admission, NRS-2002 and MUST should be used to screen for nutritional status. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2011) 65, 269-274; doi:10.1038/ejcn.2010.243; published online 17 November 2010
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 274
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of four nutritional screening tools to detect nutritional risk in hospitalized patients: a multicentre study
    C Velasco
    E García
    V Rodríguez
    L Frias
    R Garriga
    J Álvarez
    P García-Peris
    M León
    [J]. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2011, 65 : 269 - 274
  • [2] Nutritional status and screening tools to detect nutritional risk in hospitalized patients with hepatic echinococcosis
    Wang, Zhan
    Xu, Jin
    Song, Ge
    Pang, MingQuan
    Guo, Bin
    Xu, XiaoLei
    Wang, HaiJiu
    Zhou, Ying
    Ren, Li
    Zhou, Hu
    Ma, Jie
    Fan, HaiNing
    [J]. PARASITE, 2020, 27
  • [3] Comparison of four different nutritional risk screening tools in hospitalized children
    Kaya, Didem Gunes
    Akin, Zeynep Caferoglu
    Orucoglu, Betul
    Celik, Elif
    [J]. REVISTA DE NUTRICAO-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2023, 36
  • [4] Comparison of nutritional risk screening tools for predicting sarcopenia in hospitalized patients
    Yuruyen, Mehmet
    Yavuzer, Hakan
    Yavuzer, Serap
    Cengiz, Mahir
    Demirdag, Filiz
    Kara, Zehra
    Avci, Suna
    Ozgur Yurttas, Nurgul
    Islamoglu, Mehmet Sami
    Imre, Eren
    Taskin, Afrodita Zeynep
    Doventas, Alper
    Erdincler, Deniz Suna
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 47 (05) : 1362 - 1369
  • [5] Comparison of nutritional risk screening tools for predicting sarcopenia in hospitalized patients
    Yuruyen, M.
    Yavuzer, H.
    Yavuzer, S.
    Cengiz, M.
    Kara, Z.
    Demirdag, F.
    Yurttas, N.
    Islamoglu, M.
    Imre, E.
    Alitoska, A.
    Doventas, A.
    Erdincler, D. S.
    Beger, T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2015, 63 : S60 - S60
  • [6] Comparison of four nutritional screening tools for Korean hospitalized children
    Lee, Yeoun Joo
    Yang, Hye Ran
    [J]. NUTRITION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 13 (54) : 410 - 414
  • [7] Comparison of two nutritional screening tools to detect nutritional risk in hematologic inpatients
    Fiol-Martinez, Lucia
    Calleja-Fernandez, Alicia
    Pintor de la Maza, Begona
    Vidal-Casariego, Alfonso
    Villar-Taibo, Rocio
    Urioste-Fondo, Ana
    Cuervo, Marta
    Cano-Rodriguez, Isidoro
    Ballesteros-Pomar, Maria D.
    [J]. NUTRITION, 2017, 34 : 97 - 100
  • [8] Comparison of Tools for Nutritional Assessment and Screening of Hospitalized Patients: A study on Surgical Patients
    Susetyowati, Susetyowati
    Sholikhati, Amalia Sarah
    Cahyaningrum, Dinda Krisma
    Rachmawati, Azizah Isna
    Handaya, Adeodatus Yuda
    [J]. MEDENIYET MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 38 (01): : 70 - 77
  • [9] Comparison of nutritional risk screening tools for predicting clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients
    Raslan, Mariana
    Gonzalez, Maria Cristina
    Goncalves Dias, Maria Carolina
    Nascimento, Mariana
    Castro, Melina
    Marques, Patricia
    Segatto, Sabrina
    Torrinhas, Raquel Susana
    Cecconello, Ivan
    Waitzberg, Dan Linetzky
    [J]. NUTRITION, 2010, 26 (7-8) : 721 - 726
  • [10] Nutritional assessment of patients with aplastic anemia: comparison of four nutritional screening tools
    Tan, Xing
    Tian, Yu
    Li, Zonghong
    Cui, Siyuan
    Wang, Zhenzhen
    Zhou, Yanfeng
    Liu, Zhaoxia
    Kong, Fansheng
    Wang, Yan
    Xu, Ruirong
    [J]. NUTRICION HOSPITALARIA, 2022, 39 (06) : 1289 - 1297