Laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: A prospective analysis of patient survival and outcomes

被引:60
|
作者
Bianchi, Paolo Pietro [1 ]
Rosati, Riccardo [1 ]
Bona, Stefano [1 ]
Rottoli, Matteo [1 ]
Elmore, Ugo [1 ]
Ceriani, Chiara [1 ]
Malesci, Alberto [2 ]
Montorsi, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Ist Clin Humanitas IRCCS, Sect Colorectal & Minimally Invas Surg, Dept Gen Surg, I-20089 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Ist Clin Humanitas IRCCS, Operating Unit Gastroenterol, Milan, Italy
关键词
rectal cancer; laparoscopic surgery; total mesorectal excision; laparoscopic colon resection;
D O I
10.1007/s10350-007-9055-9
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: The role of laparoscopic resection in the management of rectal cancer is still controversial. We prospectively evaluated patient survival and outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer at a single institution. METHODS: From November 1999 to November 2005, 107 patients with rectal cancer were treated by laparoscopy. Exclusion criteria were: metastatic disease, advanced disease with invasion of adjacent structures, clinical or radiologic involvement of the external anal sphincter, previous colonic resection, synchronous colonic adenocarcinoma, and contraindications to laparoscopy. All patients were followed prospectively for survival and complications. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A laparoscopic sphincter-saving procedure was performed in 104 patients, 2 patients had a laparoscopic Miles operation, and 1 underwent a laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure. Mean operating time was 278 (range, 135-430) minutes. Conversion to open surgery was required in 20 of 107 patients (18.7 percent). Overall morbidity was 27 percent, anastomotic leakage occurred in 14 of 104 patients (13.5 percent). There was no postoperative mortality. A mean of 18 (range, 1-49) lymph nodes was removed. Mean distance of distal margin from tumor was 2.6 (range, 0.5-10) cm; in two patients there was microscopic invasion of the distal margin. Mean hospital stay was nine (range, 4-43) days. Mean follow-up was 35.8 months. There was local recurrence in 1 of 107 patients (0.95 percent); there were no port site metastases. Actuarial five-year and disease-free survival rates are 81.4 and 79.8 percent, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic rectal surgery is feasible and oncologically radical but also technically demanding (conversion rate, 18.7 percent), time-consuming (mean operating time, 278 minutes), and associated with specific intraoperative complications. At present, the technique should only be performed in specialist centers by teams experienced in laparoscopic surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:2047 / 2053
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic rectal surgery: Rectal cancer, pelvic pouch surgery, and rectal prolapse
    Akbari, Robert P.
    Read, Thomas E.
    [J]. SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 86 (04) : 899 - +
  • [32] Prospective evaluation of sexual function after open and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
    Paraskevas Stamopoulos
    George E. Theodoropoulos
    Joanna Papailiou
    Dimitris Savidis
    Christina Golemati
    Konstantinos Bramis
    Sotirios-George Panoussopoulos
    Emmanouil Leandros
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2009, 23 : 2665 - 2674
  • [33] Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a prospective comparative study
    M. Morino
    M. E. Allaix
    G. Giraudo
    F. Corno
    C. Garrone
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2005, 19 : 1460 - 1467
  • [34] Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer - A prospective comparative study
    Morino, M
    Allaix, ME
    Giraudo, G
    Corno, F
    Garrone, C
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (11): : 1460 - 1467
  • [35] Multidimensional Analysis of the Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Son, Gyung-Mo
    Kim, Jun-Gi
    Lee, Jae-Chung
    Suh, Young-Jin
    Cho, Hyeon-Min
    Lee, Yoon-Suk
    Lee, In-Kyu
    Chun, Chung-Soo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 20 (07): : 609 - 617
  • [36] Comparison of pathological outcomes between robotic rectal cancer surgery and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis based on seven randomized controlled trials
    Liao, Guixiang
    Zhao, Zhihong
    Deng, Haijun
    Li, Xianming
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2019, 15 (05):
  • [37] Outcomes after Laparoscopic Colon and Rectal Surgery
    Ghaferi, Amir A.
    Finlayson, Emily
    [J]. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2008, 19 (01) : 48 - 52
  • [38] Rectal Cancer Surgery: robotic or laparoscopic?
    Reibetanz, J.
    Germer, C. T.
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2018, 89 (03): : 243 - 244
  • [39] Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery
    den Dulk, M.
    Marijnen, C. A. M.
    Collette, L.
    Putter, H.
    Pahlman, L.
    Folkesson, J.
    Bosset, J. -F.
    Roedel, C.
    Bujko, K.
    van de Velde, C. J. H.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (09) : 1066 - 1075
  • [40] Sarcopenia and the clinicopathological outcomes in laparoscopic rectal surgery
    Yershov, Danylo
    Zafar, Shahbaz
    Sinha, Rakesh
    Francombe, James
    Andhalgaonkar, K.
    Ramcharan, Sean
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 : 29 - 29