Laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: A prospective analysis of patient survival and outcomes

被引:60
|
作者
Bianchi, Paolo Pietro [1 ]
Rosati, Riccardo [1 ]
Bona, Stefano [1 ]
Rottoli, Matteo [1 ]
Elmore, Ugo [1 ]
Ceriani, Chiara [1 ]
Malesci, Alberto [2 ]
Montorsi, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Ist Clin Humanitas IRCCS, Sect Colorectal & Minimally Invas Surg, Dept Gen Surg, I-20089 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Ist Clin Humanitas IRCCS, Operating Unit Gastroenterol, Milan, Italy
关键词
rectal cancer; laparoscopic surgery; total mesorectal excision; laparoscopic colon resection;
D O I
10.1007/s10350-007-9055-9
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: The role of laparoscopic resection in the management of rectal cancer is still controversial. We prospectively evaluated patient survival and outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer at a single institution. METHODS: From November 1999 to November 2005, 107 patients with rectal cancer were treated by laparoscopy. Exclusion criteria were: metastatic disease, advanced disease with invasion of adjacent structures, clinical or radiologic involvement of the external anal sphincter, previous colonic resection, synchronous colonic adenocarcinoma, and contraindications to laparoscopy. All patients were followed prospectively for survival and complications. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A laparoscopic sphincter-saving procedure was performed in 104 patients, 2 patients had a laparoscopic Miles operation, and 1 underwent a laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure. Mean operating time was 278 (range, 135-430) minutes. Conversion to open surgery was required in 20 of 107 patients (18.7 percent). Overall morbidity was 27 percent, anastomotic leakage occurred in 14 of 104 patients (13.5 percent). There was no postoperative mortality. A mean of 18 (range, 1-49) lymph nodes was removed. Mean distance of distal margin from tumor was 2.6 (range, 0.5-10) cm; in two patients there was microscopic invasion of the distal margin. Mean hospital stay was nine (range, 4-43) days. Mean follow-up was 35.8 months. There was local recurrence in 1 of 107 patients (0.95 percent); there were no port site metastases. Actuarial five-year and disease-free survival rates are 81.4 and 79.8 percent, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic rectal surgery is feasible and oncologically radical but also technically demanding (conversion rate, 18.7 percent), time-consuming (mean operating time, 278 minutes), and associated with specific intraoperative complications. At present, the technique should only be performed in specialist centers by teams experienced in laparoscopic surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:2047 / 2053
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analysis of Ureteral Injuries for Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Zhang, Xingmao
    Wang, Zheng
    Zhou, Haitao
    Liang, Jianwei
    Zhou, Zhixiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 24 (10): : 698 - 701
  • [22] Comparison of laparoscopic vs. open access surgery in patients with rectal cancer:: A prospective analysis
    Stroehlein, Michael A.
    Gruetzner, Klaus-Uwe
    Jauch, Karl-Walter
    Heiss, Markus M.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2008, 51 (04) : 385 - 391
  • [23] Renal outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a propensity score analysis
    Paek, Jin Hyuk
    Kang, Sung Il
    Ryu, Jiwon
    Lim, Sung Yoon
    Ryu, Ji Young
    Son, Hyung Eun
    Jeong, Jong Cheol
    Chin, Ho Jun
    Na, Ki Young
    Chae, Dong-Wan
    Kang, Sung-Bum
    Kim, Sejoong
    [J]. KIDNEY RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 40 (04) : 634 - 644
  • [24] Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature
    Anderson, C.
    Uman, G.
    Pigazzi, A.
    [J]. EJSO, 2008, 34 (10): : 1135 - 1142
  • [25] A Comparative Analysis of Short-term Patient Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Rectal Surgery
    Crain, Nikhil
    Ho, Ngoc J.
    Aboulian, Armen
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2022, 65 (10) : 1274 - 1278
  • [26] Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Surgery in Rectal Cancer Compared with Open and Laparoscopic Surgery
    Khajeh, Elias
    Aminizadeh, Ehsan
    Moghadam, Arash Dooghaie
    Nikbakhsh, Rajan
    Goncalves, Gil
    Carvalho, Carlos
    Parvaiz, Amjad
    Kulu, Yakup
    Mehrabi, Arianeb
    [J]. CANCERS, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [27] Uptake and Patient Outcomes of Laparoscopic Colon and Rectal Cancer Surgery in a Publicly Funded System and Following Financial Incentives
    Simunovic, Marko
    Baxter, Nancy N.
    Sutradhar, Rinku
    Liu, Ning
    Cadeddu, Margherita
    Urbach, David
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (12) : 3740 - 3746
  • [28] Uptake and Patient Outcomes of Laparoscopic Colon and Rectal Cancer Surgery in a Publicly Funded System and Following Financial Incentives
    Marko Simunovic
    Nancy N. Baxter
    Rinku Sutradhar
    Ning Liu
    Margherita Cadeddu
    David Urbach
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2013, 20 : 3740 - 3746
  • [29] Prospective evaluation of sexual function after open and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
    Stamopoulos, Paraskevas
    Theodoropoulos, George E.
    Papailiou, Joanna
    Savidis, Dimitris
    Golemati, Christina
    Bramis, Konstantinos
    Panoussopoulos, Sotirios-George
    Leandros, Emmanouil
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (12): : 2665 - 2674
  • [30] PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF SEXUAL FUNCTION AFTER "OPEN" AND LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY FOR RECTAL CANCER
    Stamopoulos, Paraskevas
    Theodoropoulos, George E.
    Papailiou, Joanna
    Savidis, Dimitris
    Golemati, Christina
    Bramis, Konstandinos
    Panoussopoulos, Sotirios-George
    Leandros, Emmanouil
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 28 (5C) : 3514 - 3515