Classification and Printability of EUV Mask Defects from SEM images

被引:2
|
作者
Cho, Wonil [1 ]
Price, Daniel [1 ]
Morgan, Paul A. [1 ]
Rost, Daniel [1 ]
Satake, Masaki [2 ]
Tolani, Vikram L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Micron Technol Inc, Mask Technol Ctr, 8000 S Fed Way, Boise, ID 83716 USA
[2] KLA Tencor Corp, One Technol Dr, Milpitas, CA 95035 USA
关键词
EUV mask inspection; mask defects; ADC; Automatic Defect Classification; defect SEM review; mask SEM; reticle SEM; SEM ADC; Aerial Image Analyzer; AIA; Reticle Decision Center; RDC;
D O I
10.1117/12.2280837
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
EUV lithography is starting to show more promise for patterning some of the critical layers at the 5nm technology node and beyond. However, there still are many technical challenges to overcome before it can be implemented into high volume manufacturing (HVM) and one of them is the production of defect-free EUV masks. Mask shops today typically use their cutting-edge 193nm inspection tools to detect defects on patterned EUV masks, since no EUV actinic pattern inspection or even e-beam mask inspection tools are available. The 193nm inspection tools have limited resolution on mask dimensions targeted for EUV patterning. The theoretical resolution limit for 193nm mask inspection tools is about 60nm HP on 4X masks, which means that main feature sizes on EUV masks will be well beyond the practical resolution of 193nm inspection tools. Nevertheless, 193nm inspection tools with various illumination conditions to maximize defect sensitivity and/or main-pattern modulation are being explored for initial EUV defect detection. Due to the generally low signal-to-noise in 193nm inspection imaging of EUV masks, these inspections often need to be run "hot" resulting in hundreds or thousands of defects getting detected. Each one of these detections then need to be accurately reviewed and dispositioned. Manually reviewing each defect is difficult due to poor 193nm resolution. In addition, the lack of a reliable aerial image dispositioning system makes it even more challenging to disposition for printability. In this paper, we present the use of SEM images of EUV masks for higher resolution review and disposition of defects. In this approach, most of the defects detected by the 193nm inspection tools are first imaged on a mask SEM tool. These images together with the corresponding post-OPC design clips are provided to KLA-Tencor's Reticle Decision Center (RDC) platform which provides a comprehensive SEM ADC (Automatic Defect Classification) analysis of every defect. First, a defect-free or reference mask SEM image is rendered from the post-OPC design, and the defective signature is determined from the difference image. The defective signatures help assess the true nature of the defect as seen under e-beam imaging; for example, excess or missing EUV absorber, line-edge roughness, contamination, etc. Next, the defect and reference contours are extracted from the grayscale SEM images and fed into the simulation engine with an EUV mask and scanner model to generate corresponding EUV defect and reference aerial images. These are then analyzed for printability and dispositioned using RDC's Aerial Image Analyzer application to automatically measure and estimate the impact of the mask defect to wafer CDs. By integrating the SEM ADC application into the EUV inspection and review flow this way, every defect is characterized for its type and printability. Such defect characterization is essential not only for determining which defects are nuisance or critical, but also for monitoring the performance of EUV mask process tools. With EUV lithography progressing towards volume manufacturing and progress being made in the area of e-beam based mask inspectors, the EUV SEM ADC software solution will continue serving an essential role of dispositioning defects off e-beam imaging.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Wafer Printability Simulation of EUV Mask Defects Using Mask SEM and AFM
    Son, Donghwan
    He, Lanpo
    Satake, Masaki
    He, Ying
    Park, Kihun
    Kim, Suhwan
    Jiao, Jing
    Hu, Peter
    Tolani, Vikram
    METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL XXXVIII, 2024, 12955
  • [2] Printability Study of Pattern Defects in the EUV Mask as a Function of hp Nodes
    Kim, Tae-Geun
    Seo, Hwan-Seok
    Kang, In-Yong
    Jeong, Chang Young
    Huh, Sungmin
    Na, Jihoon
    Kim, Seong-Sue
    Jeon, Chan-Uk
    Mochi, Iacopo
    Goldberg, Kenneth A.
    EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET (EUV) LITHOGRAPHY III, 2012, 8322
  • [3] Printability and propagation of stochastic defects through a study o defects programmed on EUV mask
    Das, Poulomi
    Moussa, Alain
    Beral, Christophe
    Gupta, Mihir
    Saib, Mohamed
    Halder, Sandip
    Charley, Anne-Laure
    Leray, Philippe
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET LITHOGRAPHY 2021, 2021, 11854
  • [4] EUV mask pattern defect printability
    Liang, Ted
    Zhang, Guojing
    Naulleau, Patrick
    Myers, Alan
    Park, Seh-Jin
    Stivers, Alan
    Vandentop, Gilroy
    PHOTOMASK AND NEXT GENERATION LITHOGRAPHY MASK TECHNOLOGY XIII, PTS 1 AND 2, 2006, 6283
  • [5] EUV Mask Multilayer Defects and Their Printability under Different Multilayer Deposition Conditions
    Kwon, Hyuk Joo
    Harris-Jones, Jenah
    Cordes, Aaron
    Satake, Masaki
    Li, Ying
    Mochi, Iacopo
    Goldberg, Kenneth A.
    EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET (EUV) LITHOGRAPHY III, 2012, 8322
  • [6] Investigating Printability of Native Defects on EUV Mask Blanks through Simulations and Experiments
    Upadhyaya, Mihir
    Jindal, Vibhu
    Herbol, Henry
    Jang, Il-Yong
    Kwon, Hyuk Joo
    Harris-Jones, Jenah
    Denbeaux, Gregory
    EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET (EUV) LITHOGRAPHY V, 2014, 9048
  • [7] Modeling methodologies and defect printability maps for buried defects in EUV mask blanks
    Lam, Michael C.
    Neureuther, Andrew R.
    EMERGING LITHOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES X, PTS 1 AND 2, 2006, 6151 : U200 - U211
  • [8] Computational Techniques for determining Printability of Real defects in EUV Mask pilot line
    Morgan, Paul
    Rost, Daniel
    Price, Daniel
    Li, Ying
    Peng, Daniel
    Chen, Dongxue
    Hu, Peter
    Corcoran, Noel
    Son, Donghwan
    Yonenaga, Dean
    Tolani, Vikram
    METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XXVIII, 2014, 9050
  • [9] Evaluating Printability of Buried Native EUV Mask Phase Defects through a Modeling and Simulation Approach
    Upadhyaya, Mihir
    Jindal, Vibhu
    Basavalingappa, Adarsh
    Herbol, Henry
    Harris-Jones, Jenah
    Jang, Il-Yong
    Goldberg, Kenneth A.
    Mochi, Iacopo
    Marokkey, Sajan
    Demmerle, Wolfgang
    Pistor, Thomas V.
    Denbeaux, Gregory
    EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET (EUV) LITHOGRAPHY VI, 2015, 9422
  • [10] Reflecting on inspectability and wafer printability of EUV mask absorbers
    Seki, Kazunori
    Badger, Karen
    Gallagher, Emily
    McIntyre, Gregory
    Konishi, Toshio
    Kodera, Yutaka
    Takahashi, Satoshi
    Redding, Vincent
    PHOTOMASK TECHNOLOGY 2013, 2013, 8880