Application of life cycle assessment to the LCA case studies single superphosphate production

被引:21
|
作者
Silva, GA [1 ]
Kulay, LA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Grp Pollut Prevent, BR-05508900 Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
关键词
life cycle assessment (LCA); life cycle inventory (LCI); single superphosphate manufacture; allocation LCA; fertilizer; phosphate fertilizer; sulfuric acid production; LCA; sulfuric acid; environmental impacts; Brazil; Brazilian industry;
D O I
10.1007/BF02978473
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Goal, Scope and Background. There is a competition between wet and thermal routes for phosphate fertilizers manufacture. In the Brazilian case, the thermal route is represented by thermophosphate. This fertilizer is considered the most adequate one for Brazilian agricultural conditions; its main restriction is the intensive consumption of energy necessary for its production. The wet route uses sulfuric acid to directly produce the single superphosphate (SSP) or the intermediate phosphoric acid, which will be used to result in triple superphosphate (TSP) and ammonium phosphate production. The main restriction of the wet route is the large amount of phosphogypsum generated in phosphoric acid production. Envisaged is an environmental comparison of both routes using LCA methodology. This paper presents the LCA for SSP production. The goal of the study is to establish the Environmental Profile of this fertilizer. Eight impact categories were selected for the study. The system boundaries was defined for a 'cradle to gate' approach, including extraction of natural resources, intermediate products, and production. The SSP System. The SSP system (single superphosphate) comprises the stages of mining and concentration of the phosphate rock, elemental sulfur extraction, production of sulfuric acid, and manufacture of single superphosphate. SSP LCI. The LCI was performed considering the production of 1.0 ton of SSP (single superphosphate) as a Functional Unit. The data collected were developed for different producing companies, all of them located in the same regional area. Allocation criteria of energy and mass were applied to the production of sulfuric acid and manufacture of single superphosphate. The transportation step included either the transport of the mined phosphated rock to the concentration plant or the transport of the phosphate concentrate to the SSP unit. Conclusion, Recommendation and Perspective. The accomplishment of an LCA to SSP production identified the GWP and EP as its meaningful environmental impacts. In reference to global warming, the transportation step was the greatest contributor agent, while the losses of PO4- from the SSP manufacturing were the main cause of ER The most important contribution in terms of water consumption was observed in the concentration step. Finally, the self sufficiency of the sulfuric acid production in energetic terms must be highlighted. The knowledge of the environmental profile of fertilizers is necessary to support LCA studies of agricultural products, a relevant raw material source for many industrial sectors. The method used here may be important for modelling other LCA fertilizer studies. As most of the agricultural raw materials are transferred among different countries, comparisons of the environmental profiles of fertilizers in developed and developing countries are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 214
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of lighting technologies for greenhouse crop production
    Zhang, Hao
    Burr, John
    Zhao, Fu
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 : 705 - 713
  • [32] A Review of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Studies for Hydrogen Production Technologies through Water Electrolysis: Recent Advances
    Shaya, Negar
    Gloeser-Chahoud, Simon
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (16)
  • [33] LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA) OF FOOD-PRODUCTS AND PRODUCTION SYSTEMS
    ANDERSSON, K
    OHLSSON, T
    OLSSON, P
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 5 (05) : 134 - 138
  • [34] Representing crop rotations in life cycle assessment: a review of legume LCA studies
    Marcela Porto Costa
    David Chadwick
    Sophie Saget
    Robert M. Rees
    Michael Williams
    David Styles
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2020, 25 : 1942 - 1956
  • [35] Status of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in Africa
    Karkour, Selim
    Rachid, Safa
    Maaoui, Mariem
    Lin, Chia-Chun
    Itsubo, Norihiro
    ENVIRONMENTS, 2021, 8 (02) : 1 - 46
  • [36] Life cycle assessment (LCA) — quo vadis?
    Bradley A. Grimsted
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1997, 2 (1) : 32 - 32
  • [37] Representing crop rotations in life cycle assessment: a review of legume LCA studies
    Costa, Marcela Porto
    Chadwick, David
    Saget, Sophie
    Rees, Robert M.
    Williams, Michael
    Styles, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (10): : 1942 - 1956
  • [38] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and degradable polymers
    Grant, Tim
    ACS Symposium Series, 2012, 1114 : 45 - 58
  • [39] The environmental impact assessment of wheat and barley production by using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology
    F. Fallahpour
    A. Aminghafouri
    A. Ghalegolab Behbahani
    M. Bannayan
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2012, 14 (6) : 979 - 992
  • [40] Evaluation of the environmental impacts of apple production using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Case study in New Zealand
    Canals, LMI
    Burnip, GM
    Cowell, SJ
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 114 (2-4) : 226 - 238