The Effect of Successful Rebubbling After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty on Endothelial Cell Counts

被引:13
|
作者
Shehadeh, Raneen [1 ]
Kaiserman, Igor [2 ,3 ]
Kumar, Nikhil [1 ]
Sansanayudh, Wiwan [1 ]
Rootman, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Ophthalmol, Toronto Western Hosp, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[2] Barzilai Govt Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Ashqelon, Israel
[3] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Fac Hlth Sci, Beer Sheva, Israel
关键词
DSAEK; repositioning; rebubbling; endothelial cell loss; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; VISUAL-ACUITY; EYES; DISLOCATION;
D O I
10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181cb40f6
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To examine the effect of successful repositioning/rebubbling of the graft on endothelial cell counts (ECCs) in eyes after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed the outcomes of 58 eyes that underwent Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Fifty-one eyes were attached after surgery. Seven were detached and underwent rebubbling with minimal manipulation in 5 and significant manipulation in 2, after which the graft was attached and clear. Visual outcomes and endothelial cell loss at 6 months were compared between eyes that underwent repositioning/ rebubbling and those that did not. The following were excluded: 2 eyes that had primary failure, 2 eyes that had rejection, 1 eye that failed to attach after rebubbling, 2 eyes that failed to clear after rebubbling, and 24 eyes that did not have ECC at 6 months. Results: The 2 groups were comparable considering age, preoperative best-corrected visual acuity, surgical variables, combined procedures, donor cell count, and graft size. The mean postoperative spherical equivalent, manifest and topographic astigmatism, uncorrected visual acuity, and best-corrected visual acuity did not differ significantly between the 2 groups at 6 months. Mean pre- and postoperative ECC did not differ significantly between the group that underwent repositioning/ rebubbling and the group that did not (preoperative counts 2742 6 268 vs. 2747 6 353 and postoperative counts 1590 6 367 vs. 1746 6 491, respectively). Endothelial cell loss also did not differ significantly between the 2 groups, although there was a trend to greater cell loss in the reattachment group (-39.4% +/- 11.1% vs. -38.3% +/- 16.2%, respectively; P = 0.6). Conclusion: Successful reattachment procedure does not seem to cause significant endothelial cell loss.
引用
收藏
页码:878 / 882
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes of rebubbling for graft detachment after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty or Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty
    Bhalerao, Sushank A.
    Mohamed, Ashik
    Vaddavalli, Pravin K.
    Murthy, Somasheila, I
    Reddy, Jagadesh C.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 68 (01) : 48 - 53
  • [2] Endothelial cell counts after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyes
    Ang, Marcus
    Mehta, Jodhbir S.
    Anshu, Arundhati
    Wong, Hon Kiat
    Htoon, Hla M.
    Tan, Donald
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 6 : 537 - 544
  • [3] Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty
    Sharma, Namrata
    Maharana, Prafulla K.
    Singhi, Shipra
    Aron, Neelima
    Patil, Mukesh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 65 (03) : 198 - 209
  • [4] Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Tourtas, Theofilos
    Laaser, Kathrin
    Bachmann, Bjoern O.
    Cursiefen, Claus
    Kruse, Friedrich E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 153 (06) : 1082 - 1090
  • [5] Late Endothelial Failure After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Mehta, J. S.
    Poh, R.
    Beuerman, R. W.
    Tan, D. T. H.
    CORNEA, 2008, 27 (10) : 1215 - 1216
  • [6] Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty as Treatment for Graft Failure After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Weller, Julia M.
    Tourtas, Theofilos
    Kruse, Friedrich E.
    Schloetzer-Schrehardt, Ursula
    Fuchsluger, Thomas
    Bachmann, Bjoern O.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 159 (06) : 1050 - 1057
  • [7] Outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for graft failure after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty
    Agha, Bishr
    Shajari, Mehdi
    Slavik-Lencova, Anna
    Kohnen, Thomas
    Schmack, Ingo
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 13 : 553 - 559
  • [8] Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty
    Woo, Jyh-Haur
    Ang, Marcus
    Htoon, Hla Myint
    Tan, Donald
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 207 : 288 - 303
  • [9] Clinical profile of graft detachment and outcomes of rebubbling after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty
    Chaurasia, Sunita
    Vaddavalli, Pravin Krishna
    Ramappa, Muralidhar
    Garg, Prashant
    Sangwan, Virender S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 95 (11) : 1509 - 1512
  • [10] Is Nanothin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Comparable to Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty?
    Sahay, Pranita
    Singhal, Deepali
    Maharana, Prafulla K.
    Titiyal, Jeewan S.
    CORNEA, 2018, 37 (12) : E56 - E56