Ambulatory blood pressure profile in hypertensive patients with β-thalassemia minor

被引:9
|
作者
Vyssoulis, Gregory [1 ]
Karpanou, Eva [3 ]
Kyvelou, Stella-Maria [1 ]
Tzamou, Vanessa [1 ]
Triantafyllou, Andreas [1 ]
Theodosiadis, George [2 ]
Stefanadis, Christodoulos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Athens, Hippokrat Hosp, Cardiol Clin 1, Hypertens Unit, Athens, Greece
[2] Hippokrateion Hosp, Dept Hematol, Athens, Greece
[3] Onassis Cardiosurg Ctr, Cardiol Clin 1, Athens, Greece
关键词
ambulatory blood pressure; dipping pattern; essential hypertension; beta-thalassemia trait; LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY; TARGET ORGAN DAMAGE; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; HEMOGLOBIN CHAINS; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; PROTECTIVE FACTOR; TRAIT; REPRODUCIBILITY; LIPIDS;
D O I
10.1038/hr.2010.226
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
beta-thalassemia trait (beta-TT) is a common genetic disorder in Mediterranean countries, including Greece. Previous studies have shown the protective effect of beta-TT against myocardial infarction. However, the ambulatory blood pressure (BP) profile of such patients has not yet been investigated. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to investigate the ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) profile of hypertensives with beta-TT, in comparison with all-cause anemic and non-anemic essential hypertensive patients. The study ultimately comprised of 8861 essential hypertensive, nondiabetic patients who were divided into three groups: group I (n=191, with beta-TT), group II (n=655, anemic) and group III (n=8015, nonanemic). All patients underwent full clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic evaluations, whereas all were subjected to ABPM. Anemia was defined as Hb < 12 g per 100 ml for women and < 13 g per 100 ml for men, whereas patients with beta-TT were self-referred. The distribution of dipping patterns among the three groups was 61.3 vs. 41.2 vs. 45.8% (P < 0.001), whereas for nondippers it was 20.4 vs. 31.5 vs. 27.7% (P < 0.001), for extreme-dippers it was 15.7 vs. 15.0 vs. 17.5% (P < 0.001) and for reverse dippers it was 2.6 vs. 12.4 vs. 9.0% (P < 0.001). Furthermore, mean daytime systolic BP (SBP) among the three groups was 140.13 +/- 7.79 vs. 142.02 +/- 11.61 vs. 141.99 +/- 9.87mm Hg (P=0.03), and mean nighttime SBP was 125.87 +/- 10.4 vs. 131.13 +/- 15.7 vs. 129.62 +/- 13.31mm Hg (P < 0.001). In the multiple regression analysis, after adjustments for age, body mass index and lipid levels, the differences among daytime and nighttime SBP remained significant at 140.18 +/- 9.84 vs. 142.02 +/- 9.85 vs. 141.99 +/- 9.85mm Hg (P=0.04) and 125.99 +/- 13.07 vs. 131.19 +/- 13.08 vs. 129.61 +/- 13.07mm Hg (P < 0.001), respectively. Hypertensive patients with beta-TT present with a better 24-h BP profile in comparison with anemic and nonanemic hypertensives. Thus, beta-TT may function protectively in their total cardiovascular risk profile. Hypertension Research (2011) 34, 253-256; doi: 10.1038/hr.2010.226; published online 2 December 2010
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 256
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predictors of controlled ambulatory blood pressure in treated hypertensive patients with uncontrolled office blood pressure
    Ono, A
    Fujita, T
    HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2004, 27 (11) : 805 - 811
  • [32] Role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hypertensive patients having controlled office blood pressure
    Mohammad, Jan
    Khan, Khursheed Aslam
    Hafeez, Imran
    Rather, Hilal Ahmad
    Lone, Ajaz Ahmad
    INDIAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 74 (06) : 474 - 477
  • [33] Ambulatory blood pressure measurement-mandatory for blood pressure monitoring in treated hypertensive patients?
    Lehmann, M. V.
    Zeymer, U.
    Dechend, R.
    Hupfer, S.
    Deeg, E.
    Senges, J.
    Schmieder, R. E.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 33 : 37 - 38
  • [34] COMPARISON OF THE AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE VARIABILITY IN DIABETIC HYPERTENSIVE AND NON DIABETIC HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS
    Ali, Syed Nauman
    Maaz, Muhammad
    Khan, Mubasher Ali
    Almani, Tahir Mohyud Din
    Hashmi, Kashif Ali
    PAKISTAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 52 (04): : 381 - 385
  • [35] Profile of hypertensive Indonesian patients in a cardiovascular hospital using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring focused on resistant hypertension
    Hikmayani, Airin Alia
    Rachmawan, Yogi Puji
    CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GLOBAL HEALTH, 2024, 28
  • [36] BLOOD PRESSURE PROFILE IN CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PATIENTS
    Cader, Rizna Abdul
    Gafor, Halim Abdul
    Mohd, Rozita
    Ibrahim, Suriani
    Haslina, W. H. Wan
    Bain, Arba'iyah
    Kong, Norella C. T.
    EXCLI JOURNAL, 2012, 11 : 116 - 124
  • [37] Profile of interdialytic ambulatory blood pressure in a cohort of Chinese patients
    W Liu
    H Ye
    B Tang
    Z Song
    Z Sun
    P Wen
    J Yang
    Journal of Human Hypertension, 2014, 28 : 677 - 683
  • [38] Profile of interdialytic ambulatory blood pressure in a cohort of Chinese patients
    Liu, W.
    Ye, H.
    Tang, B.
    Song, Z.
    Sun, Z.
    Wen, P.
    Yang, J.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2014, 28 (11) : 677 - 683
  • [39] Ambulatory blood pressure profile and autonomic symptoms poststroke patients
    Idiacuiez, J.
    Araya, P.
    Gigoux, J.
    Matamala, G.
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 357 : E200 - E201
  • [40] Comparison of Ambulatory Tonometric and Oscillometric Blood Pressure Monitoring in Hypertensive Patients
    Hornstrup, Bodil Gade
    Rosenbaek, Jeppe Bakkestrom
    Bech, Jesper Norgaard
    INTEGRATED BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL, 2020, 13 : 41 - 47