共 50 条
Comparison of Ambulatory Tonometric and Oscillometric Blood Pressure Monitoring in Hypertensive Patients
被引:6
|作者:
Hornstrup, Bodil Gade
[1
,2
]
Rosenbaek, Jeppe Bakkestrom
Bech, Jesper Norgaard
机构:
[1] Reg Hosp West Jutland, Univ Clin Nephrol & Hypertens, Holstebro, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Holstebro, Denmark
来源:
关键词:
ambulatory blood pressure monitoring;
oscillometric;
tonometric;
PROGNOSTIC VALUE;
MANAGEMENT;
MORTALITY;
BURDEN;
D O I:
10.2147/IBPC.S235228
中图分类号:
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100210 ;
摘要:
Aim: Correct measurement of blood pressure (BP) is important for optimal diagnosis and treatment of patients with hypertension. The aim of this study was to compare a wrist-worn device using tonometric measurements of BP to a conventional device using oscillometric measurements of 24 h BP, diagnosing of hypertension, and non-dipping. Methods: One-hundred patients in the Renal Outpatient Clinic had 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring performed with a tonometric device, BPro, and an oscillometric device, A&D, simultaneously. Results: Twenty-four-hour and daytime systolic BP was significantly lower using tonometric monitoring compared to oscillometric (7 and 6 mmHg, respectively, p< 0.001). In the population of patients diagnosed with hypertension, the tonometric device diagnosed 90% of patients with uncontrolled hypertension correctly (positive predictive value), whereas 49% of patients classified as normotensive were uncontrolled hypertensive (negative predictive value). The mean difference between relative nocturnal BP decrease between tonometric and oscillometric was 2+8% (p< 0.01), and 33% of patients classified as dippers were nondippers (negative predictive value). Conclusion: Using the BPro device for tonometric monitoring of BP and classification of hypertension and non-dipping in patients diagnosed with hypertension leads to misclassification of patients. Therefore, the BPro device is not suitable for clinical practice in hypertensive patients from a Renal Outpatient Clinic.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 47
页数:7
相关论文