Optimal Quantum Control with Poor Statistics

被引:25
|
作者
Sauvage, Frederic [1 ]
Mintert, Florian [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Phys Dept, Blackett Lab, Prince Consort Rd, London SW7 2BW, England
来源
PRX QUANTUM | 2020年 / 1卷 / 02期
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
DYNAMICS; APPROXIMATION; GENERATION; STATES; GAS;
D O I
10.1103/PRXQuantum.1.020322
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Control of quantum systems is a central element of high-precision experiments and the development of quantum technological applications. Control pulses that are typically temporally or spatially modulated are often designed based on theoretical simulations. As we gain control over larger and more complex quantum systems, however, we reach the limitations of our capabilities of theoretical modeling and simulations, and learning how to control a quantum system based exclusively on experimental data can help us to exceed those limitations. Because of the intrinsic probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics, it is fundamentally necessary to repeat measurements on individual quantum systems many times in order to estimate the expectation value of an observable with good accuracy. Control algorithms requiring accurate data can thus imply an experimental effort that negates the benefits of avoiding theoretical modeling. We present a control algorithm that finds optimal control solutions in the presence of large measurement shot noise and even in the limit of single-shot measurements. The algorithm builds up on Bayesian optimization that is well suited to handle noisy data; but since the commonly used assumption of Gaussian noise is not appropriate for projective measurements with a low number of repetitions, we develop Bayesian inference that respects the binomial nature of shot noise. With several numerical and experimental examples we demonstrate that this method is capable of finding excellent control solutions with minimal experimental effort.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sufficient Statistics for Optimal Decentralized Control in System of Systems
    Nigam, Nikhil
    Lall, Sanjay
    Hovareshti, Pedram
    Ezra, Kristopher
    Mockus, Linas
    Tolani, Devendra
    Sloan, Shawn
    2018 FIRST IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR INDUSTRIES (AI4I 2018), 2018, : 92 - 95
  • [22] Optimal control of the state statistics for a linear stochastic system
    Chen, Yongxin
    Georgiou, Tryphon
    Pavon, Michele
    2015 54TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2015, : 6508 - 6515
  • [23] Robust quantum optimal control for Markovian quantum systems
    Liu, Ran
    Yang, Xiaodong
    Li, Jun
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2024, 110 (01)
  • [24] Noncommutative optimal control and quantum networks
    Yanagisawa, M
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2006, 73 (02):
  • [25] Optimal control in disordered quantum systems
    Coopmans, Luuk
    Campbell, Steve
    De Chiara, Gabriele
    Kiely, Anthony
    PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH, 2022, 4 (04):
  • [26] Optimal control landscapes for quantum observables
    Rabitz, Herschel
    Hsieh, Michael
    Rosenthal, Carey
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 124 (20):
  • [27] Extending XACC for Quantum Optimal Control
    Nguyen, Thien
    Santana, Anthony
    McCaskey, Alexander
    IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUANTUM COMPUTING AND ENGINEERING (QCE20), 2020, : 391 - 401
  • [28] Optimal Quantum Control by Composite Pulses
    Kyoseva, Elica
    Vitanov, Nikolay
    2014 CONFERENCE ON LASERS AND ELECTRO-OPTICS (CLEO), 2014,
  • [29] Quantum optimal control of HCN isomerization
    Artamonov, Maxim
    Ho, Tak-San
    Rabitz, Herschel
    CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 328 (1-3) : 147 - 155
  • [30] Optimal control, geometry, and quantum computing
    Nielsen, Michael A.
    Dowling, Mark R.
    Gu, Mile
    Doherty, Andrew C.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2006, 73 (06):