Intraoperative conversion does not affect the oncological outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal cancer

被引:6
|
作者
Liu, Xue-Hai [1 ]
Hu, Yi [2 ]
Li, Kun-Kun [1 ]
Wang, Ying-Jian [1 ]
Jiang, Yao-Guang [1 ]
Guo, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Third Mil Med Univ, Daping Hosp, Inst Surg Res, Dept Thorac Surg, Chongqing 400042, Peoples R China
[2] Third Mil Med Univ, Daping Hosp, Inst Surg Res, Dept Anesthesiol, Chongqing 400042, Peoples R China
关键词
Esophageal cancer; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; McKeown esophagectomy; Intraoperative conversion; Survival; ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY; LATERAL POSITION; EXPERIENCE; MOBILIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-018-6202-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe aim of this study is to summarize the causes and implications of intraoperative conversion from minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) to open thoracotomy, and to evaluate the effect on long-term survival.MethodsThere were 293 thoracoscopic esophagectomies for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) of the thoracic esophagus performed by the authors from September 2009 to August 2015. Totally, 257 patients were enrolled in this study. These patients were divided into two groups (those underwent complete MIE and those converted to open thoracotomy) and then compared. A standardized preoperative evaluation, as well as a postoperative method of following at a regular frequency were adopted for all of these patients. The clinicopathologic characteristics and the perioperative variables were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors. And the Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare survival differences.ResultsThere were 231 patients (89.9%) underwent successful thoracoscopic esophagectomy (Group 1), and 26 cases (10.1%) required conversion to open procedure (Group 2). The majority of conversion (73.1%, 19/26) occurred in the initial 100 cases. No significant difference in background or clinicopathologic factors between the two groups was observed, but patients in Group 2 had significantly longer operative time and more operative blood loss. Among the 26 patients of Group 2, there were nine cases that need emergent conversion for various reasons. And the most common cause for emergent conversion was intraoperative bleeding. Univariate and multivariate analyses all demonstrated that intraoperative conversion did not significantly influence the overall or recurrence-free survival of these patients.ConclusionsUnivariate analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis indicated that intraoperative conversion did not significantly influence the OS and RFS rate of these patients. Our results demonstrated that the intraoperative conversion did not affect the long-term survival of patients underwent MIE for ESCC.
引用
收藏
页码:4517 / 4526
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk Factors and Treatment of Chylothorax After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
    Tsuchitani, Yuma
    Ozawa, Yohei
    Taniyama, Yusuke
    Okamoto, Hiroshi
    Sato, Chiaki
    Ishida, Hirotaka
    Kamei, Takashi
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [42] Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Predictors of Utilization and Outcomes in the National Cancer Data Base
    Brown, Craig S.
    Gwilliam, Natalie R.
    Lapin, Brittany
    Lufti, Waseem
    Kyrillos, Alexandra
    Kim, Ki Wan
    Howington, John A.
    Krantz, Seth B.
    Talamonti, Mark S.
    Ujiki, Michael
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2016, 223 (04) : S23 - S24
  • [43] Comment on "The Effect of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer''
    Yonekura, Hiroshi
    Nakamori, Yuki
    Takeda, Chikashi
    Kawasaki, Yohei
    Kamei, Masataka
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 274 (06) : E672 - E672
  • [44] Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma
    Predina, Jarrod D.
    Morse, Christopher R.
    VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 6
  • [45] Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal leiomyomatosis
    Shibata, Ryohei
    Saito, Takeshi
    Terui, Keita
    Nakata, Mitsuyuki
    Komatsu, Shugo
    Mitsunaga, Tetsuya
    Matsuura, Gen
    Shibasaki, Hidehito
    Kinoshita, Takahiro
    Yoshida, Hideo
    Hishiki, Tomoro
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY CASE REPORTS, 2020, 56
  • [46] Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer - results of surgical therapy
    Vrba, Radek
    Aujesky, Rene
    Vomackova, Katherine
    Bohanes, Tomas
    Stasek, Martin
    Neoral, Cestmir
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2015, 10 (02) : 189 - 196
  • [47] Minimally invasive esophagectomy and its current role in esophageal cancer
    Predina, J. D.
    Morse, C. R.
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2014, 69 (06) : 363 - 370
  • [48] Minimally invasive esophagectomy for stage I and II esophageal cancer
    Yamamoto, S
    Kawahara, K
    Maekawa, T
    Shiraishi, T
    Shirakusa, T
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2005, 80 (06): : 2070 - 2075
  • [49] Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: less is more
    van der Sluis, Pieter Christiaan
    Grimminger, Peter Philipp
    van Hillegersberg, Richard
    Ruurda, Jelle Piet-Hein
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2019, 11 : S1935 - S1937
  • [50] Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer?
    Li, Jingpei
    Shen, Yaxing
    Tan, Lijie
    Feng, Mingxiang
    Wang, Hao
    Xi, Yong
    Wang, Qun
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (04): : 925 - 930