Intraoperative conversion does not affect the oncological outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal cancer

被引:6
|
作者
Liu, Xue-Hai [1 ]
Hu, Yi [2 ]
Li, Kun-Kun [1 ]
Wang, Ying-Jian [1 ]
Jiang, Yao-Guang [1 ]
Guo, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Third Mil Med Univ, Daping Hosp, Inst Surg Res, Dept Thorac Surg, Chongqing 400042, Peoples R China
[2] Third Mil Med Univ, Daping Hosp, Inst Surg Res, Dept Anesthesiol, Chongqing 400042, Peoples R China
关键词
Esophageal cancer; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; McKeown esophagectomy; Intraoperative conversion; Survival; ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY; LATERAL POSITION; EXPERIENCE; MOBILIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-018-6202-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe aim of this study is to summarize the causes and implications of intraoperative conversion from minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) to open thoracotomy, and to evaluate the effect on long-term survival.MethodsThere were 293 thoracoscopic esophagectomies for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) of the thoracic esophagus performed by the authors from September 2009 to August 2015. Totally, 257 patients were enrolled in this study. These patients were divided into two groups (those underwent complete MIE and those converted to open thoracotomy) and then compared. A standardized preoperative evaluation, as well as a postoperative method of following at a regular frequency were adopted for all of these patients. The clinicopathologic characteristics and the perioperative variables were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors. And the Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare survival differences.ResultsThere were 231 patients (89.9%) underwent successful thoracoscopic esophagectomy (Group 1), and 26 cases (10.1%) required conversion to open procedure (Group 2). The majority of conversion (73.1%, 19/26) occurred in the initial 100 cases. No significant difference in background or clinicopathologic factors between the two groups was observed, but patients in Group 2 had significantly longer operative time and more operative blood loss. Among the 26 patients of Group 2, there were nine cases that need emergent conversion for various reasons. And the most common cause for emergent conversion was intraoperative bleeding. Univariate and multivariate analyses all demonstrated that intraoperative conversion did not significantly influence the overall or recurrence-free survival of these patients.ConclusionsUnivariate analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis indicated that intraoperative conversion did not significantly influence the OS and RFS rate of these patients. Our results demonstrated that the intraoperative conversion did not affect the long-term survival of patients underwent MIE for ESCC.
引用
收藏
页码:4517 / 4526
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
    Navidi, Maziar
    Phillips, Alexander W.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 380 (17):
  • [22] Oncologic outcomes in minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma
    Devaud, Nicolas A.
    Yeung, Jonathan C.
    Darling, Gail E.
    VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 6
  • [23] Minimally invasive treatment of esophageal cancer: Laparoscopic staging to robotic esophagectomy
    Espat, NJ
    Jacobsen, G
    Horgan, S
    Donahue, P
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2005, 11 (01): : 10 - 17
  • [24] Trimodality treatment for advanced esophageal cancer: Impact of minimally invasive esophagectomy
    Williams, D. G.
    Carpenter, S.
    Ross, H. J.
    Paripati, H.
    Ashman, J. B.
    Callister, M. D.
    Harold, K. L.
    Jaroszewski, D. E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (04)
  • [25] Minimally invasive esophagectomy for the treatment of esophageal cancer:a report of 81 cases
    陈保富
    ChinaMedicalAbstracts(Surgery), 2011, 20 (03) : 161 - 162
  • [26] Improving Oncologic Outcomes for Esophageal Cancer After Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
    Alexandra I. Mansour
    Rishindra M. Reddy
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2022, 29 : 5369 - 5371
  • [27] Outcomes After Converted Minimally Invasive to Open Esophagectomy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer
    Gergen, Anna K.
    Halpern, Alison L.
    Helmkamp, Laura
    Torphy, Robert J.
    White, Allana M.
    Mitchell, John D.
    Meguid, Robert A.
    Scott, Christopher D.
    Gleisner, Ana L.
    McCarter, Martin D.
    Weyant, Michael J.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 112 (05): : 1593 - 1599
  • [28] Improving Oncologic Outcomes for Esophageal Cancer After Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
    Mansour, Alexandra I.
    Reddy, Rishindra M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (09) : 5369 - 5371
  • [29] Comparison of perioperative outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
    Mao, Teng
    Fang, Wentao
    Gu, Zhitao
    Guo, Xufeng
    Ji, Chunyu
    Chen, Wenhu
    THORACIC CANCER, 2015, 6 (03) : 303 - 306
  • [30] Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: The Evolution and Technique of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Esophageal Cancer
    Toshitaka Hoppo
    Blair A. Jobe
    John G. Hunter
    World Journal of Surgery, 2011, 35 : 1454 - 1463