Intraoperative conversion does not affect the oncological outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal cancer

被引:6
|
作者
Liu, Xue-Hai [1 ]
Hu, Yi [2 ]
Li, Kun-Kun [1 ]
Wang, Ying-Jian [1 ]
Jiang, Yao-Guang [1 ]
Guo, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Third Mil Med Univ, Daping Hosp, Inst Surg Res, Dept Thorac Surg, Chongqing 400042, Peoples R China
[2] Third Mil Med Univ, Daping Hosp, Inst Surg Res, Dept Anesthesiol, Chongqing 400042, Peoples R China
关键词
Esophageal cancer; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; McKeown esophagectomy; Intraoperative conversion; Survival; ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY; LATERAL POSITION; EXPERIENCE; MOBILIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-018-6202-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe aim of this study is to summarize the causes and implications of intraoperative conversion from minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) to open thoracotomy, and to evaluate the effect on long-term survival.MethodsThere were 293 thoracoscopic esophagectomies for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) of the thoracic esophagus performed by the authors from September 2009 to August 2015. Totally, 257 patients were enrolled in this study. These patients were divided into two groups (those underwent complete MIE and those converted to open thoracotomy) and then compared. A standardized preoperative evaluation, as well as a postoperative method of following at a regular frequency were adopted for all of these patients. The clinicopathologic characteristics and the perioperative variables were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors. And the Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare survival differences.ResultsThere were 231 patients (89.9%) underwent successful thoracoscopic esophagectomy (Group 1), and 26 cases (10.1%) required conversion to open procedure (Group 2). The majority of conversion (73.1%, 19/26) occurred in the initial 100 cases. No significant difference in background or clinicopathologic factors between the two groups was observed, but patients in Group 2 had significantly longer operative time and more operative blood loss. Among the 26 patients of Group 2, there were nine cases that need emergent conversion for various reasons. And the most common cause for emergent conversion was intraoperative bleeding. Univariate and multivariate analyses all demonstrated that intraoperative conversion did not significantly influence the overall or recurrence-free survival of these patients.ConclusionsUnivariate analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis indicated that intraoperative conversion did not significantly influence the OS and RFS rate of these patients. Our results demonstrated that the intraoperative conversion did not affect the long-term survival of patients underwent MIE for ESCC.
引用
收藏
页码:4517 / 4526
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intraoperative conversion does not affect the oncological outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal cancer
    Xue-Hai Liu
    Yi Hu
    Kun-Kun Li
    Ying-Jian Wang
    Yao-Guang Jiang
    Wei Guo
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 4517 - 4526
  • [2] Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in octogenarians. Clinical and oncological outcomes
    Sdralis, Ilias
    Davakis, Spyridon
    Syllaios, Athanasios
    Mpaili, Eustratia
    Lorenzi, Bruno
    Charalabopoulos, Alexandros
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2020, 25 (01): : 520 - 526
  • [3] Hybrid Minimally-invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Clinical and Oncological Outcomes
    Davakis, Spyridon
    Syllaios, Athanasios
    Sdralis, Elias
    Lorenzi, Bruno
    Charalabopoulos, Alexandros
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 40 (03) : 1753 - 1758
  • [4] Oncological outcomes of the TIME trial in esophageal cancer: is it the era of minimally invasive esophagectomy?
    Tan, Lijie
    Tang, Han
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (04)
  • [5] Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Techniques and Outcomes
    Petropoulos, K.
    Macheras, A.
    Liakakos, T.
    Misiakos, E. P.
    CHIRURGIA, 2015, 110 (02) : 99 - 108
  • [6] Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: approaches and outcomes
    Danica N. Giugliano
    Adam C. Berger
    Ernest L. Rosato
    Francesco Palazzo
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2016, 401 : 747 - 756
  • [7] Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: approaches and outcomes
    Giugliano, Danica N.
    Berger, Adam C.
    Rosato, Ernest L.
    Palazzo, Francesco
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2016, 401 (06) : 747 - 756
  • [8] EARLY POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES OF THE ESOPHAGECTOMY MINIMALLY INVASIVE IN ESOPHAGEAL CANCER
    Francischetto, Thiago
    Pinheiro, Vaner Paulo da Silva Fonseca
    Viana, Eduardo Freitas
    Moraes, Eduardo Dias de
    Protasio, Bruno Mendonca
    Lessa, Marco Antonio Oliveira
    Almeida, Gustavo Lousado de
    Barretto, Victor Rivera Duran
    Albuquerque, Alexandre Farias de
    ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 36
  • [9] Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
    Berlth, Felix
    Hadzijusufovic, Edin
    Mann, Carolina
    Fetzner, Ulrich Klaus
    Grimminger, Peter
    THERAPEUTISCHE UMSCHAU, 2022, 79 (3-4) : 181 - 187
  • [10] Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in COVID hospitals and oncological hubs: are the outcomes different?
    Milito, Pamela
    Asti, Emanuele
    Resta, Marco
    Bonavina, Luigi
    EUROPEAN SURGERY-ACTA CHIRURGICA AUSTRIACA, 2022, 54 (02): : 98 - 103